Gulf Keystone Petroleum Share Discussion Threads

[bigdog5] 16/2/2019 20:48

Here's another masterpiece from surreyscot aka highlander7. The poster that ran away out of extreme embarrassment of getting absolutely everything wrong, Lol.

"There is obviously a good reason why the Reserves update has been delayed. Probably the KRG until the O&G Law is signed and sealed.

It wont just be new investors who benefit , those with the nous to keep there original shares AND buy more will also reap the reward of faith and patience.

IMO"

Can you all spot the error he's still making? LOFL.

Any signs of the Xom/Chevron/Total dividends you told everyone to hold for, LOFL. Be patient he used to tell everyone, lol.

Is the good reason because relations might be jank between the parties? Or that the MNR can't be fussed over a company that's producing a paltry amount of very heavy oil which is lessening the value of the better quality oil it's blended with? Or the fact that the hyped 55k a day has slipped even further? There's a few others but you make up your own reality.

It must be very frustrating for the MNR watching the performance (lack of) of this company versus what a few of the other producers are achieving. Perhaps JF realises it will always be an issue and that's why he was looking elsewhere.

[gkp_banggone] 16/2/2019 20:27

Zzzzzzzzzzzxzzz

[gkp_banggone] 16/2/2019 20:26

SALE BY SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT ANNOUNCED BY 8:00 AM FEB 19YOU CAN TAKE THAT TO THE BANK 😊 AND YOU ARE VERY WELCOMETrev on lse#1 I have had two of my devices prevented from posting comments to this site.#2 800m effective 2P is the very minimum reserve level the company has at its current WI of 80%. A typical M+A valuation applied $boe would be typically a multiple of 14-16, for reserves of such scale. $ 12bn some £40 a share in current issue. I read speculation that the company has bought back its own shares using a third party via broker or banker. Until confirmed this is obviously speculation. It is clearly what the company should have been doing as it would add even higher upside for remaining investors.#3 An additional valuation metric is $ paid per flowing barrel. This reflects the lifecycle stage of the project, the fact that production infrastructure exists, and revenues are in place. It also widely fluctuates dependent upon a resources growth potential and lifetime. In the case of Shaikan it is very early stage, high growth potential, and if the directors are to be believed, has a lifetime of perhaps as much as a century. On this basis the valuation could be a good deal higher.#4 the real valuation is what a buyer is prepared to pay. If the Chinese are the buyers exclusively or as part of a consortium then the mandate these state led organisations have, is to ensure Chinese state access to long term reserves, with cost secondary. The Chinese would place reserve securitisation above price.#5 CNPC is the clear suspect as buyer had around 3.6bn reserves 2017 reports. We can see therefore that acquiring GKP would add transformational to these, with the considerable advantage that if oil prices were too fall, these reserves can still be booked as commercially recoverable , at far lower crude price models, as the lifting costs are so low.#6 I maintain that a minimum of 800m 2P is effective. It is very likely with EOR and future discovery, and with the real possibility the matrix is releasing oil to fractures, that this is very conservative.#7 The Chinese will also know that, and would potentially pay a large premium. Sinopec for example has in the past paid more than $1bn to drill far smaller unproven acreage than Shaikan.#8 this will be my last contribution to this forum, and I wish genuine investors every success, and believe that that success is likely near term. Man ska inte skåda given häst i munnen.xxczczx

[gkp_banggone] 16/2/2019 18:19

SALE BY SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT ANNOUNCED BY 8:00 AM FEB 19YOU CAN TAKE THAT TO THE BANK 😊 AND YOU ARE VERY WELCOMETrev on lse#1 I have had two of my devices prevented from posting comments to this site.#2 800m effective 2P is the very minimum reserve level the company has at its current WI of 80%. A typical M+A valuation applied $boe would be typically a multiple of 14-16, for reserves of such scale. $ 12bn some £40 a share in current issue. I read speculation that the company has bought back its own shares using a third party via broker or banker. Until confirmed this is obviously speculation. It is clearly what the company should have been doing as it would add even higher upside for remaining investors.#3 An additional valuation metric is $ paid per flowing barrel. This reflects the lifecycle stage of the project, the fact that production infrastructure exists, and revenues are in place. It also widely fluctuates dependent upon a resources growth potential and lifetime. In the case of Shaikan it is very early stage, high growth potential, and if the directors are to be believed, has a lifetime of perhaps as much as a century. On this basis the valuation could be a good deal higher.#4 the real valuation is what a buyer is prepared to pay. If the Chinese are the buyers exclusively or as part of a consortium then the mandate these state led organisations have, is to ensure Chinese state access to long term reserves, with cost secondary. The Chinese would place reserve securitisation above price.#5 CNPC is the clear suspect as buyer had around 3.6bn reserves 2017 reports. We can see therefore that acquiring GKP would add transformational to these, with the considerable advantage that if oil prices were too fall, these reserves can still be booked as commercially recoverable , at far lower crude price models, as the lifting costs are so low.#6 I maintain that a minimum of 800m 2P is effective. It is very likely with EOR and future discovery, and with the real possibility the matrix is releasing oil to fractures, that this is very conservative.#7 The Chinese will also know that, and would potentially pay a large premium. Sinopec for example has in the past paid more than $1bn to drill far smaller unproven acreage than Shaikan.#8 this will be my last contribution to this forum, and I wish genuine investors every success, and believe that that success is likely near term. Man ska inte skåda given häst i munnen.xxczczx

[gkp_banggone] 16/2/2019 18:19

Zzzzzzzzzzzxzzz

[mcfly02] 16/2/2019 18:06

HabscamScot,

You still haven't answered the questions put to you ?

As for you being in London you are not far outside the M25 despite what you say 😳

Are you John 😘

[roverite12] 16/2/2019 17:25

....and let's not forget the following post from the Dog5hite . The doggie hero-worshipped Kozel so much that he bought a GKP inspired car number plate which he planned to present to the great man when we were sold at the predicted price of £20 per share .....(roughly a grand or so a share in today's money ....lol)

The dog later sold all his shares for 4 pence each - incurring a 99% loss of his "investment"



-----------






"Cambradjones, already got mine ages ago as I thought it would be a good investment. If Kozel gets me £25 a share I may give it to him. Its a good one."

[gkp_banggone] 16/2/2019 16:26

Zzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzxzzz

[gkp_banggone] 16/2/2019 16:26

XxxxcSALE BY SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT ANNOUNCED BY 8:00 AM FEB 19YOU CAN TAKE THAT TO THE BANK 😊 AND YOU ARE VERY WELCOMETrev on lse#1 I have had two of my devices prevented from posting comments to this site.#2 800m effective 2P is the very minimum reserve level the company has at its current WI of 80%. A typical M+A valuation applied $boe would be typically a multiple of 14-16, for reserves of such scale. $ 12bn some £40 a share in current issue. I read speculation that the company has bought back its own shares using a third party via broker or banker. Until confirmed this is obviously speculation. It is clearly what the company should have been doing as it would add even higher upside for remaining investors.#3 An additional valuation metric is $ paid per flowing barrel. This reflects the lifecycle stage of the project, the fact that production infrastructure exists, and revenues are in place. It also widely fluctuates dependent upon a resources growth potential and lifetime. In the case of Shaikan it is very early stage, high growth potential, and if the directors are to be believed, has a lifetime of perhaps as much as a century. On this basis the valuation could be a good deal higher.#4 the real valuation is what a buyer is prepared to pay. If the Chinese are the buyers exclusively or as part of a consortium then the mandate these state led organisations have, is to ensure Chinese state access to long term reserves, with cost secondary. The Chinese would place reserve securitisation above price.#5 CNPC is the clear suspect as buyer had around 3.6bn reserves 2017 reports. We can see therefore that acquiring GKP would add transformational to these, with the considerable advantage that if oil prices were too fall, these reserves can still be booked as commercially recoverable , at far lower crude price models, as the lifting costs are so low.#6 I maintain that a minimum of 800m 2P is effective. It is very likely with EOR and future discovery, and with the real possibility the matrix is releasing oil to fractures, that this is very conservative.#7 The Chinese will also know that, and would potentially pay a large premium. Sinopec for example has in the past paid more than $1bn to drill far smaller unproven acreage than Shaikan.#8 this will be my last contribution to this forum, and I wish genuine investors every success, and believe that that success is likely near term. Man ska inte skåda given häst i munnen.xxczczx

[habshan] 16/2/2019 16:23

Bigdog - "Btw, the easy, cheap and fast work over at S1, wasn't it supposed to take but a few days?"

Oilman - "According to the company announcement the workover at SH1 was supposed to take around 10 days"

Ok, so at least we've established that these two boneheads who are working themselves up into a lather about all sorts of "clues" and "issues" can't even read a basic programme.

No wonder they can't understand what the company is telling them.

[gkp_banggone] 16/2/2019 14:48

It's 10 weeks 3 days till 30/4Did you know that?

[gkp_banggone] 16/2/2019 14:33

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzxzzz

[gkp_banggone] 16/2/2019 14:33

XxSALE BY SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT ANNOUNCED BY 8:00 AM FEB 19YOU CAN TAKE THAT TO THE BANK 😊 AND YOU ARE VERY WELCOMETrev on lse#1 I have had two of my devices prevented from posting comments to this site.#2 800m effective 2P is the very minimum reserve level the company has at its current WI of 80%. A typical M+A valuation applied $boe would be typically a multiple of 14-16, for reserves of such scale. $ 12bn some £40 a share in current issue. I read speculation that the company has bought back its own shares using a third party via broker or banker. Until confirmed this is obviously speculation. It is clearly what the company should have been doing as it would add even higher upside for remaining investors.#3 An additional valuation metric is $ paid per flowing barrel. This reflects the lifecycle stage of the project, the fact that production infrastructure exists, and revenues are in place. It also widely fluctuates dependent upon a resources growth potential and lifetime. In the case of Shaikan it is very early stage, high growth potential, and if the directors are to be believed, has a lifetime of perhaps as much as a century. On this basis the valuation could be a good deal higher.#4 the real valuation is what a buyer is prepared to pay. If the Chinese are the buyers exclusively or as part of a consortium then the mandate these state led organisations have, is to ensure Chinese state access to long term reserves, with cost secondary. The Chinese would place reserve securitisation above price.#5 CNPC is the clear suspect as buyer had around 3.6bn reserves 2017 reports. We can see therefore that acquiring GKP would add transformational to these, with the considerable advantage that if oil prices were too fall, these reserves can still be booked as commercially recoverable , at far lower crude price models, as the lifting costs are so low.#6 I maintain that a minimum of 800m 2P is effective. It is very likely with EOR and future discovery, and with the real possibility the matrix is releasing oil to fractures, that this is very conservative.#7 The Chinese will also know that, and would potentially pay a large premium. Sinopec for example has in the past paid more than $1bn to drill far smaller unproven acreage than Shaikan.#8 this will be my last contribution to this forum, and I wish genuine investors every success, and believe that that success is likely near term. Man ska inte skåda given häst i munnen.xxczczx

[gkp_banggone] 16/2/2019 14:32

MmmmmmZSALE BY SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT ANNOUNCED BY 8:00 AM FEB 19YOU CAN TAKE THAT TO THE BANK 😊 AND YOU ARE VERY WELCOMETrev on lse#1 I have had two of my devices prevented from posting comments to this site.#2 800m effective 2P is the very minimum reserve level the company has at its current WI of 80%. A typical M+A valuation applied $boe would be typically a multiple of 14-16, for reserves of such scale. $ 12bn some £40 a share in current issue. I read speculation that the company has bought back its own shares using a third party via broker or banker. Until confirmed this is obviously speculation. It is clearly what the company should have been doing as it would add even higher upside for remaining investors.#3 An additional valuation metric is $ paid per flowing barrel. This reflects the lifecycle stage of the project, the fact that production infrastructure exists, and revenues are in place. It also widely fluctuates dependent upon a resources growth potential and lifetime. In the case of Shaikan it is very early stage, high growth potential, and if the directors are to be believed, has a lifetime of perhaps as much as a century. On this basis the valuation could be a good deal higher.#4 the real valuation is what a buyer is prepared to pay. If the Chinese are the buyers exclusively or as part of a consortium then the mandate these state led organisations have, is to ensure Chinese state access to long term reserves, with cost secondary. The Chinese would place reserve securitisation above price.#5 CNPC is the clear suspect as buyer had around 3.6bn reserves 2017 reports. We can see therefore that acquiring GKP would add transformational to these, with the considerable advantage that if oil prices were too fall, these reserves can still be booked as commercially recoverable , at far lower crude price models, as the lifting costs are so low.#6 I maintain that a minimum of 800m 2P is effective. It is very likely with EOR and future discovery, and with the real possibility the matrix is releasing oil to fractures, that this is very conservative.#7 The Chinese will also know that, and would potentially pay a large premium. Sinopec for example has in the past paid more than $1bn to drill far smaller unproven acreage than Shaikan.#8 this will be my last contribution to this forum, and I wish genuine investors every success, and believe that that success is likely near term. Man ska inte skåda given häst i munnen.xxczczx

[gkp_banggone] 16/2/2019 14:32

ZzZSALE BY SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT ANNOUNCED BY 8:00 AM FEB 19YOU CAN TAKE THAT TO THE BANK 😊 AND YOU ARE VERY WELCOMETrev on lse#1 I have had two of my devices prevented from posting comments to this site.#2 800m effective 2P is the very minimum reserve level the company has at its current WI of 80%. A typical M+A valuation applied $boe would be typically a multiple of 14-16, for reserves of such scale. $ 12bn some £40 a share in current issue. I read speculation that the company has bought back its own shares using a third party via broker or banker. Until confirmed this is obviously speculation. It is clearly what the company should have been doing as it would add even higher upside for remaining investors.#3 An additional valuation metric is $ paid per flowing barrel. This reflects the lifecycle stage of the project, the fact that production infrastructure exists, and revenues are in place. It also widely fluctuates dependent upon a resources growth potential and lifetime. In the case of Shaikan it is very early stage, high growth potential, and if the directors are to be believed, has a lifetime of perhaps as much as a century. On this basis the valuation could be a good deal higher.#4 the real valuation is what a buyer is prepared to pay. If the Chinese are the buyers exclusively or as part of a consortium then the mandate these state led organisations have, is to ensure Chinese state access to long term reserves, with cost secondary. The Chinese would place reserve securitisation above price.#5 CNPC is the clear suspect as buyer had around 3.6bn reserves 2017 reports. We can see therefore that acquiring GKP would add transformational to these, with the considerable advantage that if oil prices were too fall, these reserves can still be booked as commercially recoverable , at far lower crude price models, as the lifting costs are so low.#6 I maintain that a minimum of 800m 2P is effective. It is very likely with EOR and future discovery, and with the real possibility the matrix is releasing oil to fractures, that this is very conservative.#7 The Chinese will also know that, and would potentially pay a large premium. Sinopec for example has in the past paid more than $1bn to drill far smaller unproven acreage than Shaikan.#8 this will be my last contribution to this forum, and I wish genuine investors every success, and believe that that success is likely near term. Man ska inte skåda given häst i munnen.xxc

[gkp_banggone] 16/2/2019 14:31

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzxzzz

[habshan] 16/2/2019 14:31

Tell me Oilman.

Where does it say that I was going to be in London recently?

[gkp_banggone] 16/2/2019 14:31

Qqqqqqxzzz

[gkp_banggone] 16/2/2019 14:31

Xxxxxxxxxxxxzzz

[gkp_banggone] 16/2/2019 14:30

MmmmmmZSALE BY SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT ANNOUNCED BY 8:00 AM FEB 19YOU CAN TAKE THAT TO THE BANK 😊 AND YOU ARE VERY WELCOMETrev on lse#1 I have had two of my devices prevented from posting comments to this site.#2 800m effective 2P is the very minimum reserve level the company has at its current WI of 80%. A typical M+A valuation applied $boe would be typically a multiple of 14-16, for reserves of such scale. $ 12bn some £40 a share in current issue. I read speculation that the company has bought back its own shares using a third party via broker or banker. Until confirmed this is obviously speculation. It is clearly what the company should have been doing as it would add even higher upside for remaining investors.#3 An additional valuation metric is $ paid per flowing barrel. This reflects the lifecycle stage of the project, the fact that production infrastructure exists, and revenues are in place. It also widely fluctuates dependent upon a resources growth potential and lifetime. In the case of Shaikan it is very early stage, high growth potential, and if the directors are to be believed, has a lifetime of perhaps as much as a century. On this basis the valuation could be a good deal higher.#4 the real valuation is what a buyer is prepared to pay. If the Chinese are the buyers exclusively or as part of a consortium then the mandate these state led organisations have, is to ensure Chinese state access to long term reserves, with cost secondary. The Chinese would place reserve securitisation above price.#5 CNPC is the clear suspect as buyer had around 3.6bn reserves 2017 reports. We can see therefore that acquiring GKP would add transformational to these, with the considerable advantage that if oil prices were too fall, these reserves can still be booked as commercially recoverable , at far lower crude price models, as the lifting costs are so low.#6 I maintain that a minimum of 800m 2P is effective. It is very likely with EOR and future discovery, and with the real possibility the matrix is releasing oil to fractures, that this is very conservative.#7 The Chinese will also know that, and would potentially pay a large premium. Sinopec for example has in the past paid more than $1bn to drill far smaller unproven acreage than Shaikan.#8 this will be my last contribution to this forum, and I wish genuine investors every success, and believe that that success is likely near term. Man ska inte skåda given häst i munnen.xxc