Griffin Mining Share Discussion Threads

[rose_by_another_name] 27/5/2021 10:22

That constitutes an assurance by a government
agency, no matter how much you want to quibble
about it. An assurance issued before the science
took place.

[rose_by_another_name] 27/5/2021 10:21

Another story from March, even after many
countries suspended the use of the vaccine-

"Both the European Medicines Agency and
the World Health Organisation have said
there is no evidence there is any link
between the vaccine and blood clots and
have urged countries to continue using it."



But now German scientists have actually
found out why the vaccine causes blood
clots.

[amt] 27/5/2021 10:18

Rose yet again you are taking snippets and distorting what was said.
To state there was no proof of something is very different from stating that something is a fact.
Science is evidence based and you need to make an effort to understand that.

[zooman] 27/5/2021 10:16

No Slug not by something like you that's forsure. As it was once said about you "Picked up on the bottom of a shoe". You have the paranoia, noone else. Nice day for flying, have fun looking for vaccine rubbish on your computer. The chaps here at the airfield are asking was it pink that you were dressed up in? :-))

[rose_by_another_name] 27/5/2021 09:58

Zoo is getting pretty wild in his nastiness.
He must really be feeling threatened, by mere
words.

[rose_by_another_name] 27/5/2021 09:57

I didn't say that any scientist assured us
that the vaccine was not related to the
blood clots. I said were we assured, and so
we were, by various government bodies- just
one example from back in March:

"EU regulators today moved to quell safety
concerns, insisting there was no proof the
vaccine causes dangerous side-effects. "

"European Medicines Agency (EMA) bosses said
they were 'firmly convinced' that injections
with the AstraZeneca shot should continue. Safety
experts said a 'very small number of people'
have come down with blood disorders but there
is 'no indication' the jab was to blame."

According to you, there are no scientists in
European Medicines Agency. I couldn't say.

[mattjos] 27/5/2021 09:55

no idea katsy but, I agree with your analysis & now that gap has filled this looks near perfectly set up to romp away upwards from here in coming weeks

[katsy] 27/5/2021 09:42

why the tick down on my post?

[zooman] 27/5/2021 09:38

Slug give it a rest you idiot! I doubt anyone gives a toss about what you post given the socially aware people have had the jabs unlike you. Go and look at the old women mags.

[amt] 27/5/2021 09:36

Rose by posting two unrelated articles and linking the two together and now not clarifying your position we all know what you are up too.
Your latest post has nothing to do with it by the way.
Plus we were never were assured the the blood clot issue was
nothing to do with the vaccine, before
the scientists had even looked into it.
Thats utterly wrong, you invented that out of thin air.
No scientist every reached that conclusion
Pure invention on your part to fit your agenda.

[katsy] 27/5/2021 09:25

A little top up from me. The HTF looks almost complete, so unless there's bad news we are not expecting, then I can only see a positive break.

[rose_by_another_name] 27/5/2021 09:23

"Germans 'SOLVE' Covid vaccine blood clot
puzzle: Scientists say rare side effect
from AstraZeneca jabs is caused by cold
virus used to deliver the jab into the
body - and can be FIXED"



Let's remember that we were originally
assured the the blood clot issue was
nothing to do with the vaccine, before
the scientists had even looked into it.

[rose_by_another_name] 27/5/2021 09:16

I made no such "clarification". I presented
factual articles to the forum. YOU made the
link yourself and blamed me for it. I have
not expressed an opinion either way. That
doesn't mean I haven't got an opinion, only
that I have not shared it with the forum.
Yes, my position, as far as you can tell,
is ambiguous. Your assertion that I have
changed my stance or clarified it is bogus.

What is interesting about this exchange is
that you (and others) have attacked me as
a dangerous conspiracy theorist and other
more vile epithets merely for posting links
to news in a respected national newspaper.
Your bubble is that fragile.

[amt] 27/5/2021 09:05

Neverthetless Rose glad you clarified that you see no link after your ambiguous post on the matter.
I am one hundred percent sure there was no link and how you managed to twist what I wrote on the matter is
Absurd as everyone will have observed.

[rose_by_another_name] 27/5/2021 08:47

Zoo is now saying that the Daily Mail is a
danger to society. Good luck trying to
silence them.

People who would silence dissenting
views and even suppress actual facts
from being reported are the danger to
society.

[rose_by_another_name] 27/5/2021 08:46

AMT- I made no such assertion, either way.
I brought two factual articles in a major
respected national newspaper to your (and
others) attention. You made a connection
on your own judgement and reviled me for
your own assessment of what it meant. I
believe this is because your belief bubble
was threatened, and you reacted to defend
it, regardless of fact. You are going to
have continued trouble with this, not
from me but from the real world, which will
not conform to your biases.

I will, of course continue to post. It is
always encouraging to see posters use their
own voices to call for my silence. It means
they are starting to think.

[zooman] 27/5/2021 08:40

AMT, the problem with people like him is that they are a danger to society.

[alangriffbang] 27/5/2021 08:36

morning zoo, not much going on ,I’ve got 4 friends on there way down from London have got to dash have a good day,

[alangriffbang] 27/5/2021 08:24

amt better not to post at all is best,

[amt] 27/5/2021 08:22

Ok Rose thanks for clarifying that there is absolutely no link between the death mentioned and the vaccine.
You need to be clearer in your posts or better not post at all.

[zooman] 27/5/2021 08:11

Slug, lower the better for a while all good stuff lets hope we see the lower 20s.

[rose_by_another_name] 27/5/2021 08:01

Looking at Matjos' AAZ forum, the first line of the
company description reads, "low-cost, profitable
& dividend-paying". Seems like that third aspect
ranks up there with the other two as a positive for
the company. No mention of buy-backing. Probably they
don't bother with it.

Griffin opens down again.