Greatland Gold Share Price (GGP)

Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Greatland Gold Plc LSE:GGP London Ordinary Share GB00B15XDH89 ORD 0.1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.0% 4.725 0.00 00:00:00
Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price
4.65 4.80 0.00 0.00 0.00
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Mining -1.84 -0.07 169
Last Trade Time Trade Type Trade Size Trade Price Currency
- O 0 0.00 GBX
Related Shares
Rio Tinto (RIO), Bhp (BHP), Mila Resources (MILA), African Battery Metals (ABM)

Greatland Gold (GGP) Latest News

Greatland Gold News

Date Time Source Headline
11/2/202011:05UKREGGreatland Gold PLC Second Price Monitoring Extn
11/2/202011:00UKREGGreatland Gold PLC Price Monitoring Extension
07/2/202010:10UKREGGreatland Gold PLC Director Share Purchase
04/2/202014:23ALNCGreatland Gold Intersects Mineralisation At Australian Project
04/2/202012:50UKREGGreatland Gold PLC Block Listing Application
04/2/202009:30ALNCFAlliance News Flash Headline
04/2/202009:26UKREGGreatland Gold PLC Warrentinna Drilling Results
30/1/202014:05UKREGGreatland Gold PLC Second Price Monitoring Extn
30/1/202014:00UKREGGreatland Gold PLC Price Monitoring Extension
30/1/202010:42DJNGreatland Gold Shares Rise on Deposit Expansion in Australia
More Greatland Gold News
Greatland Gold Takeover Rumours

Greatland Gold (GGP) Discussions and Chat

Greatland Gold Forums and Chat

Date Time Title Posts
21/2/202007:27GREATLAND GOLD - CHARTS & NEWS9,576
21/2/202007:17Greatland Gold1,197
20/2/202001:31GET INTO GREATLAND AT BARGAIN pRICE BY BUYING pRIMORUS WHO HAVE 37M SHARES 3
20/2/202001:28RIO TINTO COULD BE INTERESTED IN GREATLAND GOLD..WATCH THIS SPACE!10
19/2/202013:29warning! IG to crash greatland price before EUA margin increase friday?13

Add a New Thread

Greatland Gold (GGP) Most Recent Trades

Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type
2020-02-20 17:18:154.6530.14O
2020-02-20 16:37:374.6530.14O
2020-02-20 16:29:274.7983,5073,999.99O
2020-02-20 16:28:034.79105,9305,074.05O
2020-02-20 16:27:464.7041,0661,930.10O
View all Greatland Gold trades in real-time

Greatland Gold (GGP) Top Chat Posts

DateSubject
20/2/2020
08:20		Greatland Gold Daily Update: Greatland Gold Plc is listed in the Mining sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker GGP. The last closing price for Greatland Gold was 4.78p.
Greatland Gold Plc has a 4 week average price of 2.30p and a 12 week average price of 1.54p.
The 1 year high share price is 5.90p while the 1 year low share price is currently 1.43p.
There are currently 3,577,233,658 shares in issue and the average daily traded volume is 178,996,760 shares. The market capitalisation of Greatland Gold Plc is £169,024,290.34.
Read Full Thread
Reply
16/2/2020
09:21		mirabeau: Shake your market maker Market makers cover a book of stocks, and while they do set the prices and make the market, they can sometimes be caught off guard. Many of the stocks on SETSqx are driven by sentiment. Aim is not known for being efficient. This means they can sometimes be caught in a bit of a pickle, if they have misjudged the news and opened the stock up too low. We’ll come back to this. Although market makers set the price, they take on the risk of making a market so that private investors and traders are able to buy and sell during market hours. To compensate for this risk, they will often buy stock from us when we sell at a price below the share price and charge us a price higher than the share price when we wish to buy from them. This is known as the bid-ask spread, and this is how they make their money as the price they will buy from us is almost always lower than the price they will sell to us. They make a financial turn on every trade. The spread is the price of dealing in stocks and in smaller companies often set by the market makers. The job of the market maker is to ensure there is always a market in which we can deal and they facilitate liquidity. As market makers set the spread, there is the incentive to widen the spread as much as possible to maximise their gains. But wider spreads deter traders. Fewer traders mean fewer turns, and so the market makers’ greed keeps them in check. The most competitive market maker gets the turn, and this is why when volume increases spreads narrow, as competing market makers are jumping over one another to do business. This is why stocks with little interest see wider spreads – a market maker is unlikely to have much stock on their books as they also don’t want the risk of holding an illiquid stock unless they are fairly compensated for that risk in every turn. When we log into our sharedealing accounts and individual savings accounts (Isas), we type in the stock we want to buy and load up the dealing ticket. With some brokers, we can do a dummy buy and sell, and if we type in 5,000 shares to buy we will get a fixed price, and the same for when we sell. You will see that the buy and the sell price are different, and this is the bid-ask spread in action. That process happens because when we sit at our computers, or log on to our dealing apps, and request a quote, the Retail Service Provider (RSP) network fires off a request for pricing from all market makers dealing in that stock, collects all of the prices, and displays the lowest price to buy or the highest price to sell to us on our screens. Do market makers have an advantage? Many private investors believe market makers have an advantage over the rest of the market in that they get the RNS (Regulatory News Search) news first. Well, not while I’ve been trading they haven’t. Up until recently this year, a small-cap company could release a piece of hugely positive news intra-day, and before the market makers had adjusted their price it was possible to clean out the ask of stock at the same price offered before the news came out. Even better, if a piece of bad news came out on a stock you could dump your shares quickly and then even take a short position through a spread bet before the bid had dropped. Surely, if they’d seen it, they would’ve done something? Unfortunately, that trick is no longer possible with online brokers, as I have noticed when a piece of news now comes out on an illiquid stock intra-day it is impossible to buy or sell a share and no quote is offered online. My guess is that there is now an algorithm in place that shuts off limits in this situation when an RNS is released, which allows the market makers to adjust their pricing and stop being forced to deal before they’ve read the news. However, you can still deal over the telephone – where the market makers are obliged to deal. You can also take a position through a spread bet. In my opinion, market makers should be obliged to deal at the price and size quoted online because this would lead to more liquid markets. It can be frustrating when one intends to trade a profit warning, and all of a sudden the only stock available to buy online is 10 per cent higher than the price quoted on Level 2. If you want to deal but can’t, then this is the time to get on the phone to your broker or open a spread bet position. Market makers know that the vast majority of dealing is online and so they can be relatively flexible about their pricing on Level 2 and what they actually quote online. Share price spikes Coming back to the market makers getting in a pickle, spikes can occur in share prices where the stock is illiquid yet there is higher than average volume going through the stock. We know the market makers set the spread and therefore the mid price is used as the share price. This means the share price can even rise or fall on no trades as a market maker ticks up or down on the bid or ask. This combination of the wide spreads and the mid price being used can often mean a stock can move 15 to 25 per cent on just a handful of trades. This only happens on illiquid stocks with a wide spread, because when the market makers tick up their bid price and ask price it can mean a substantial shift. For example, if we are a looking at a company with a bid-ask spread of 10p-12p, the mid price is 11p. If a buyer takes the market makers’ stock, they then need to replenish that stock and so they will up their bid, perhaps to 11p. This means the mid price is now 11.5p, and the share price is up 4.5 per cent. However, the market makers want to deter anyone from purchasing stock at 12p because they no longer have any, so they increase their ask price to 13p. The mid price is now 12p and the stock has jumped 9.1 per cent from 11p! This can lead to short-term speculation traders jumping in and this can even push a stock up by 50 per cent when there has been no news. We must always be mindful of suffering FOMO (fear of missing out) and stick to our calculated plans. Short-term speculation can be highly profitable, but the vast majority of those who attempt it lose money, because they either do not have a system in place or they do not have the discipline to follow that system. These moves are further exacerbated by those exploiting their knowledge of the way market makers operate. We understand already that the market maker’s job is to provide liquidity for the entire market. However, they do not want to hold plenty of stock in an illiquid share. There are often orchestrated pump-and-dump crews operating in small-cap stocks who take advantage of this for their own gain – a market maker who owns a small amount of stock in a share that sometimes trades only a handful of times a week might suddenly be forced to deal 10 times in the space of a few minutes. In this instance, the market maker would now be net short of stock. That is, they have sold stock that they do not actually have, and so they will need to buy back that stock to close their position. To do this, the market maker has to bid higher for the stock, in order to entice sellers in order to cover their position. But the rise in the share price and sudden spike in volume has now attracted more speculators who then hammer the market maker with buy orders. Market makers are obliged to make a market so they have to deal, and with every order the market maker is increasing their short position on the stock and the price is rising with every buy. This is how spikes are created, as they get chased by speculators and traders, and bid up to high levels. Tree shake Once the buyer appetite begins to lessen, the market maker can now use this to their advantage. When the traders stop bidding for stock at high levels and the market maker lowers their bid price, it becomes a Mexican stand-off. A ‘tree shake’ is when the market makers drop the bid in order to lower the share price, in the hope of spooking some private investors into selling their shares. This tactic is employed when buying appetite has weakened, and so the market makers capitalise and widen their spreads to deter further buying. There are no buyers in the market, but nobody wants to sell at a low price when the market maker was bidding much higher before. Eventually, someone bites, and the market maker then bids lower again. By using tricks like this and making the stock unattractive to buy by widening the spread, the market maker is able to cover their short position on the stock. The speculators who unfortunately bought the top of the spike will now have to sell at the price the market maker is bidding at unless they telephone the order in. There may be more mini spikes in the whole spike cycle and the market maker will play the market accordingly. Handsome profits can be made by speculators and traders who are in and out quickly, or who are able to time the spike, and even take a short position at the top. If the price comes back down only to meet more demand, then the market makers will run the stock up to the resistance point and widen the spread again. It becomes a case of rinse and repeat. Tree shakes are not only used in spikes, but whenever the market makers feel they can make a quick turn. In a previous article of mine, ‘The art of stop-losses’ (IC, 23 August 2019 ), we considered the possibility of market makers being able to see stops. Even if they can’t, they know where these are going to be based on looking at a chart. So they yank the price down, shake out some stops, and raise the price again in order to sell the stock on for a quick turn. Market makers are obliged to make a market – but they’ll also make a market for themselves. If you must use physical stops, use them wisely and not in obvious stop-loss liquidity. Opening risk for market makers Another way market makers can get hurt is when they misjudge the open. Some market makers will cover numerous stocks and there is no way they can follow the story and sentiment for each one. This is why they check Twitter and bulletin boards (as do a lot of traders – sentiment ultimately shifts prices). Here is an example of when I thought the market makers had been unjustly harsh on an RNS from Anglo African Oil & Gas (AAOG). We can see that from the close, the market makers gapped the price down on an RNS, which I felt did not warrant a 20 per cent gap down. Therefore, I bet against the market makers and opened up a spread bet long on the bell, which paid off in the first 10 minutes. I knew that sentiment was strong, and that the drill was still going ahead – the catalyst was still intact. I started closing the trade down at 7p and was fully out not long after. Market maker codes Despite there being a distinct lack of evidence of this, there are people who will swear blind by market maker codes. This is where a market maker will put a certain amount of stock through Level 2 in order to send a message to his market maker friends. This rumour originated from the US whereby a market maker did claim that market makers worked together if one of them found themselves in an uncomfortable position. While it is possible to put fake trades through the exchange – such as ‘wash trading’ as revealed in the Beaufort Securities scandal, which brought the broker to a collapse – there are far easier ways of market makers communicating with each other, if they really wanted to. But even now people will think a ‘1’ share trade means an RNS is coming, and people trying to ramp the price will literally buy a single share knowing that people trade on this. This is probably due to selective memory – the private investors who believe in codes remember the few times a code ‘worked’, and forget all of the previous times that it did not. Market maker etiquette I am quite sure that most readers who have dealt in the market actively will find it amusing when I say that we are supposed to treat market makers with respect. It is considered ‘bad etiquette’ to continuously request a quote and not deal (test liquidity), or accept a quote when the price has moved in our favour. It’s also considered bad form to deal twice in quick succession to take advantage of a price rather than buying it all and paying a premium to get one’s fill in one go. I have even heard of one trader being warned by his broker against arbitraging the market makers. Every now and again, one market maker will be bidding higher than another one is selling. I see this as being a helpful fellow providing liquidity for the market makers and more importantly turning a quick profit, but just be careful as those prices can change at any point. This trick of arbitraging is still possible as sometimes either a broker or a trader will leave a sell order under the bid or a buy order way above the ask. If we are the highest bidder in the auction, we can quickly spin off the stock we bought for a bargain to the market makers for a quick profit, or take the short side of the trade by selling to the buyer and covering via the RSP. This game has become very popular though, and it’s very difficult to find a trade that nobody jumps on. Unless your broker warns you that they may terminate your dealing, or you are doing something illegal (which I do not advise), then all is fair in love and war. You can download Michael’s free book on the UK stockmarket from his website at www.shiftingshares.com
Read Full Thread
Follow
Reply
02/2/2020
11:54		tumshie11: I'm not in any way an expert on how to value a prospective gold mine but that hasn't stopped me, with the aid of the internet, at having a go. Firstly I read "Interpreting Drill Results 101" on news.goldseek.com. I took the HAD020 to HAD036 drill results and calculated the volume of each gold bearing section assuming either a cylinderical or rectanglar cross-section of the stated width and then multiplied by the length to get the volume. I then assumed a rock density of 2.75 g/cm3 and a gold recovery factor of 0.8 to give a recoverable gold estimate of between 2.33 million troy ozs (cylindrical) - 2.82 million troy ozs(rectangular). I assumed an in-ground value of $200 troy/oz and hey presto out popped the answer for the GGP share value of between 3-3.6 p/share for GGP's share of 30% the lot. Amazing, that only took an hour and I feel qualified to teach the subject now. :) At least my guestimate gave an answer in the right ballpark! However, then I realised I wasn't quite expert enough in the tricky subject of the value of the gold in the ground and so after extensive Googling I realised my share price guess could be way too optimistic. Values as low as 20-30 $/oz in-ground values can be seen for M&I and $160 $/oz for P&P (www.munknee.com/how-to-value-a-junior-miners-gold-in-the-ground/) which is a lot lower than my $200/oz. The average GGP share price in pence for the two geometries I assumed is 0.017x(In-Ground Gold Value) - 0.142. So, for 30 $/oz it is 0.49p and for $160 4/oz it is 2.6p. So, now I have no idea if I have too many or too little GGP shares!
Read Full Thread
Follow
Reply
29/1/2020
11:57		zooman: If anyone is unsure about Price Monitoring, below may help.Explained: Price Monitoring ExtensionsFor anyone trading in smaller cap companies, price monitoring extensions can be an extremely common occurrence. But what are they? Why do they occur? And are they good or bad? Find out the answers to these questions and more with this article on price monitoring extensions. What is the role of an auction?Any discussion on price monitoring extensions must firstly begin by covering auctions. Auctions are small intervals during the regular trading day where the electronic order book is effectively frozen. During this time, orders are collected from the market – known as the Call Period – and the matching algorithm considers the orders that have been entered and calculates the price that the maximum amount of shares can be executed. The intention is to find the most popular and reliable price for a security.At the end of this Call Period, orders that can be matched are executed in an event referred to as the uncrossing, which takes place within a randomised 30 seconds of the end of the Call Period. However, should the auction fail to generate a reliable price, then a price monitoring extension is generated.What happens during a price monitoring extension?Should the preceding auction fail to generate a price within a predetermined percentage above or below the reference price, which is the price just before the stock went into the auction, then a price monitoring extension RNS is automatically released to the market, and the Call Period is extended by another 5 minutes. This extra 5 minutes provides participants the chance to review the prices of the orders that have been entered and if appropriate add, delete or amend.Should this additional period still fail to generate a reliable price, then a second price monitoring extension is released to the market, and the Call Period is extended by another 5 minutes. On this occasion, should the additional period also fail to generate a price within tolerance levels, then this price will be taken forward and the orders that can be matched will be executed in the uncrossing.Why might the auction fail to generate an acceptable price?One reason might be that the share has such a wide spread during that day of trading that the bid and ask price are far away from the mid-price. Given that the majority of AIM companies trade on the SETSqx trading system, where there is no maximum spread requirements, this will likely be the problem in a lot of instances.Another reason for a price monitoring extenion could be the release of news that has a sudden and significant impact on the price that investors are willing to pay for the company's shares.When do price monitoring extensions occur?Price monitoring extensions occur off of the back of an auction, which take place at different times during the trading day depending on the platform the security is traded on. Therefore, as all AIM-listed companies are traded on either the SETS or SETSqx trading system, price monitoring extensions on the AIM market can occur at the following uncrossing times:08:00 (Opening Auction; SETS)09:00 (First Intra-Day Auction; SETSqx)11:00 (Second Intra-Day Auction; SETSqx)12:02 (Intra-day Auction; SETS)14:00 (Third Intra-Day Auction; SETSqx)16:35 (Closing Auction; SETS & SETSqx)It is important to point out that price monitoring also takes place during regular trading. Here, again, should a potential execution be more than a defined percentage above or below the reference prices, then no executions at that price will occur and an auction will be triggered instead. The point of this auction is to allow the security's price to reform in an orderly fashion and then be returned to regular trading.When it comes to regular trading, the thresholds differ slightly, taking into considering two different prices: the dynamic reference price, and the static reference price.  The dynamic reference price refers to the last order book execution price (or previous closing price if more recent) prior to the submission of the incoming order. The static reference price refers to the most recent auction price from the current day. However, where that auction failed to generate an execution, the next automated trade that follows the auction is adopted instead.This price monitoring functionality during regular trading is thought to protect against large trade-to-trade price movements resulting from trading in thin order books, or through the execution of orders with incorrect details (fat fingers).What are the degrees of tolerance?The thresholds applicable are managed from a business perspective at trading sector level. Generally, though, more liquid securities have lower thresholds and less liquid securities have higher thresholds.Reflecting this, AIM SETS securities typically have a 5% threshold on auctions, whereas AIM SETSqx securities have a 10% threshold. In terms of regular trading, AIM SETSqx securities maintain thresholds used during auctions, whilst SETS securities see their dynamic and static price monitoring thresholds typically increase to 10%.The most current thresholds for all trading services are set out in this Millennium Exchange Business Parameters document.What is the purpose of a price monitoring extension?As already discussed, the extension draws attention to a potential price movement. By doing so, this allows participants to review the prices of the orders that they have entered and if appropriate add, delete or amend.The extension also indicates to investors that there may be the potential of getting a good deal for the security in question, thereby encouraging their involvement and so stabilising the price through the inputting of acceptable orders.Ultimately, though, the point of the extension is to ensure any resulting price is a fair reflection of the security.Are price monitoring extensions good or bad?Price monitoring extensions can be alarming if you're not expecting one, or you know it's a precursor to a drop in share price. Nevertheless, they are there to help remove volatility from the market by slowing down trading and encouraging the market to reach a more considered price rather than moving around on individual trades. Considering the lower levels of liquidity on AIM, price monitoring extensions can be considered, then, an important mechanism to safeguard investors.Leave a ReplyYour email address will not be published.SAVE MY NAME, EMAIL, AND WEBSITE IN THIS BROWSER FOR THE NEXT TIME I COMMENT.
Read Full Thread
Follow
Reply
27/1/2020
08:48		sicilian_kan: There were two outrageous bulletin board ramps in January as this rise developed. One was clearly market manipulation as it has been proven to be false. The other (HAD040) we shall have to see, but my bottom dollar would be on it also being proven wrong. If true there is heavy insider dealing which is just as despicable. On the other hand, GGP was significantly undervalued and the rise to these levels is easily justified. I am not bashing the share price - 3-4p is easily justifiable at present. However, whether the share price can (in reality) be maintained once the drilling results are out this week is the $64,000 question. History has shown that there is heavy selling into news, even news of exceptional drill results, and the price does drop as the market works its money elsewhere, knowing that there will be no more Havieron news for a while. In my view, it will need something truly special or transformatory in the drill results or in corporate news this week (significantly beyond the drill results of the nature of the last few releases) in order for the share price to be maintained post news. If all we have is more of the same (even if exceptional), the market could easily test 2p on the way down as hot money goes elsewhere. There is definitely short term risk at present. But medium term, I have no doubt that we are grossly undervalued even now.
Read Full Thread
Follow
Reply
18/1/2020
14:45		skyship: Telbap – done some of the work for you. As you will see in the long 1st para below, his investment into GGP is based upon his own extensive knowledge of the Havieron region: # PRIM QTLY Update – 08/02/19 Shareholders will no doubt be aware that in the Quarter we began to build a share position in Greatland Gold PLC. At the time of writing we have 35m shares representing just under 1.1% of the issued capital, purchased at an average price of 1.71p per share. This investment decision was predicated on the outstanding exploration results released in December 2018 for the Haiveron Gold Project near Telfer in Western Australia. We have been looking for a quality gold-related investment for a while as we believe gold exposure would be a good balancing influence in our portfolio. Shareholders may not be aware I researched my thesis on intrusive-related gold deposits in these relatively obscure regions of WA and the Northern Territory and studied the nearby Telfer Mine geology and geochemistry. I am of the belief that Haiveron may prove to be one of the most significant gold discoveries globally in recent times and I am pleased that we have been able to build a meaningful stake. We note that on 5 February Greatland announced a host of what we consider to be outstanding results for the second half of the discovery drill programme at Haiveron, comprising holes HAD006 - HAD009. These excellent results only further compound our view that Haiveron has the hallmarks of a globally significant gold-copper deposit in a world class mining jurisdiction. Furthermore, we believe the recent drop in the Greatland share price to be completely unrelated to the quality of the results published. We will be investigating expanding our stake in Greatland should funds be available to do so as we believe they will be firmly on the radar of industry players looking for potential Tier 1 projects. # Post here - 12 Nov 2019 - 07:37:53 - 7499 of 8043 GREATLAND GOLD - CHARTS & NEWS - GGP Extracts from PRIM’s Qtly Update today: Elsewhere Greatland Gold ("GGP.L") reported yet more significant news from its Havieron JV with Newcrest Mining ("NCM.AX"). We continue to see this investment as hugely undervalued and believe the UK market is failing to understand the significance of the drilling reported to date. More importantly we believe that given the proximity and feed requirements of the large Telfer Gold/Copper Mine, the eventual owner of the entire Havieron Project may be somewhat self-evident. …………. -- Further outstanding Gold and Copper assays reported from the Havieron JV between Greatland Gold (GGP.L) and Newcrest Mining (NCZ.AX) ('Newcrest"). Six rigs now drilling and 15 further holes either complete or in train, doubling the hole count at the project. We are expecting further updates soon. …………. We talk a lot about Greatland Gold and it features strongly on our @priminvestments twitter page primarily because the company is already AIM-listed. Australia's largest gold miner, Newcrest, continues to report superb drill results of huge widths of high tenor Gold and Copper mineralisation at Havieron. When initially building our position in Greatland Gold we did recognise that the share register being so disparate was a potential drag on the share price. To be frank, we have been surprised at how much the apparent high-volume, low conviction trading has affected the share price over the last 12 months. Clearly we would prefer to see the Greatland share price better reflect the value and potential at Havieron and elsewhere across their project portfolio. We are also mindful that the fundamentals underpinning our investment have actually exceeded our initial expectations. As a previous Director of Extract Resources representing Kalahari Minerals, I know this is not the first time a critical resource was discovered near to a major mining houses' large but depleting operating asset. In 2012 we achieved an incredible return for our shareholders by being patient and we remain so with Greatland Gold. It is our firm view that with continued exploration success the ownership of Havieron may eventually change to fit the production requirements of Newcrest's Telfer Mine just 40km away.
Read Full Thread
Follow
Reply
12/11/2019
07:37		skyship: Extracts from PRIM’s Qtly Update today: Elsewhere Greatland Gold ("GGP.L") reported yet more significant news from its Havieron JV with Newcrest Mining ("NCM.AX"). We continue to see this investment as hugely undervalued and believe the UK market is failing to understand the significance of the drilling reported to date. More importantly we believe that given the proximity and feed requirements of the large Telfer Gold/Copper Mine, the eventual owner of the entire Havieron Project may be somewhat self-evident. ………;…. -- Further outstanding Gold and Copper assays reported from the Havieron JV between Greatland Gold (GGP.L) and Newcrest Mining (NCZ.AX) ('Newcrest"). Six rigs now drilling and 15 further holes either complete or in train, doubling the hole count at the project. We are expecting further updates soon. ………;…. We talk a lot about Greatland Gold and it features strongly on our @priminvestments twitter page primarily because the company is already AIM-listed. Australia's largest gold miner, Newcrest, continues to report superb drill results of huge widths of high tenor Gold and Copper mineralisation at Havieron. When initially building our position in Greatland Gold we did recognise that the share register being so disparate was a potential drag on the share price. To be frank, we have been surprised at how much the apparent high-volume, low conviction trading has affected the share price over the last 12 months. Clearly we would prefer to see the Greatland share price better reflect the value and potential at Havieron and elsewhere across their project portfolio. We are also mindful that the fundamentals underpinning our investment have actually exceeded our initial expectations. As a previous Director of Extract Resources representing Kalahari Minerals, I know this is not the first time a critical resource was discovered near to a major mining houses' large but depleting operating asset. In 2012 we achieved an incredible return for our shareholders by being patient and we remain so with Greatland Gold. It is our firm view that with continued exploration success the ownership of Havieron may eventually change to fit the production requirements of Newcrest's Telfer Mine just 40km away.
Read Full Thread
Follow
Reply
23/9/2019
16:37		1gandhi: GGP had great news updates over last year. Gold price has also risen 25%. But GGP share price has made no overall progress. Are some insiders jumping ship?
Read Full Thread
Follow
Reply
27/2/2019
18:13		jlondon: Pr0t0n- "keep it clean" and that DL has nothing to do with GGP per your post. In secular language, "keep it clean" has a bad meaning? Gervaise Heddle in the recent London AGM said there were Australian mining experts in the room and looked into the direction of DL per investors who attended. So, obviously, Gervaise Heddle, CEO of GGP is pleased to honour DL both as a peer and as an investor of GGP. If DL had not mentioned Havieron and posted it with #ggp on Twitter NOR tweeted it to Greatland Gold @Greatland Gold, then, yes, it is off-topic. Obviously, GGP has NOT blocked DL and hence he cant tweet it to them for transparency. DL in his time did the aeromag which was FREE for us to view. He was at Artemis at the time. There was no complaint either when I posted Southern Geophysics magnetic measurements which they said were commissioned by Artemis. Nor was there any complaint that Artemis at a big Canadian mining conference put up a classy poster and mentioned HAVIERON. Nor was there any complaint when I posted samco*s article on Paterson. You yourself posted the link on this forum for others to read. Samco*s article was ACTUALLY VERY SPECIFIC about Armada[Artemis] and Havieron [GGP] and it was the detailed aeromag/geophysics that was IMPORTANT. GGP has never shown us THESE. Again, no complaints when Antipa posted the aeromagnetics nor mentioned Havieron. After all, Antipa also has nothing to do with GGP or Havieron. DL also sent the tweet to Ed Mead and Artemis and it is DL who got this Armada tenement for Artemis. Whether one likes it or not, the coming DRILLING by Artemis on Armada will also be telling and the WHOLE MINING INDUSTRY will also be talking about this and DL*s comments will be sought just as the Times and other respected publications post DL*s tweets in their article. WHY is this particular ? against DL so that I have been asked to keep "it clean" as if what was posted for something that cannot be posted. I am also wondering why something very on topic needs CENSURE so that at one instance it can be posted and in another it cannot be posted about ggp/Havieron. It appears on Twitter on the "#ggp" thread that everyone is looking at for news. I note that on LSE this is also the same? Surely, as I speak in a respectful manner one would also like to be shown respect? I do not think that what I posted is reading too much into it. At this time, Barry Fitzerald wrote that all the juniors in Paterson are going to be "affected" by the release of the Rio Winu results. So, if DL is now in Perth, obviously, he does not live there nor any of the CEO eg GH of GGP. So, when mining heads go to Perth, it is usually to either Pilbara or Paterson whether it is called Perth airport or Perth. GH said the journey is long so I guess they have to stop over in Perth before embarking to the sticks. On Hotcopper, EVERYONE is very helpful to each other and NO ONE is telling others not to post anything on-topic including Havieron. They also discussed that the Head of Rio ie CEO was seen in Perth earlier and as everyone know Antipa has a JV with Rio. No one said that it is looking too much into it. Everyone just posts on-topic as they are not posting about the share price and why it has not gone up or down. Everyone is INTERESTED in what is happening in Paterson ie juniors near Telfer and El Paso Corridor. Yes, I am very puzzled as to WHY my posts are under such "censure" whilst others are not even when they post SOLGOLD detailed results and compare Havieron with Solgold*s Alpala via kieffy -Spy does not censure? No where on London, Australian or Canadian forums is this happening. So, I will leave it at that. With best wishes. J.London. P.S. After all we are fellow investors trying to help others out by posting our finds or research. I try to bring the info onto this forum when it appears. I am not editing as I am about to have dinner. I extend my goodwill to you Pr0t0n. We live in a democracy but I find it rather strange that one can post in one instance and in another, it cannot be posted? On the LSE, it was said that I was not posting during the time of the Newmont debacle. Well, I would not like to be the bearer of what happened with Solgold/NewM as that was widely known. I was posting on Twitter with fresh news. Since there is such censure of my posting, it will be appropriate for me NOT to post on Twitter "#ggp" line as well. So, if you dont see any more posts, it is not because I SOLD OUT. I would rather keep the PEACE since offence is caused even posting on-topic re: GGP. As for DL, many of us who follow UKOG etc have seen pictures of DL with Prince Albert of Monaco [Head of Monaco] at a racing event. This also includes DL speaking to Prince Charles at his charity event. So obviously, DL gets a invitation and they speak to him. After all, Prince Charles is the King in waiting. Apparently, they do honour him with an invitation and he can bring in a Arab Prince to ARV as a major investor and to now Chair ARV? So, a man with connections to funds in New York as well and other large investors.
Read Full Thread
Follow
Reply
12/11/2018
10:56		jlondon: Quote: "Traders: Normally load up prior to a big RNS but I dont think the shares are available (im guessing). Hoping when the news drop there will be no mass sell off to stop the climb. There will also be a serious premium. Expecting a BIG jump on good news here." - On the other side at 10:19am, Mon 12 Nov 2018 [GGP] ----------------------------------------------------- I have just checked HL and they will only give a Buy live quote online to buy 10,000 shares =£120 worth. The normal mkt size is 300,000 shares for Greatland Gold. [Time: 10.30am] With all the news out and a further new article: "1st photo*s emerge of Rio Paterson*s activities: Rumoured major copper discovery boosting NEARBY juniors." - https://twitter.com/clairenfc/status/1061899962563391488 Mon 12 Nov 2018 This new article shows clearer pics. Comment: The horse has bolted so to speak as HL wont give a quote beyond 10,000 to buy. This means that one should have done the research PRIOR to today, Mon 12 Nov 2018 BEFORE all the news is out re: Paterson, Rio, Encounter etc. That is what INVESTORS do - Buy when it is LOW and share research so that others have a chance to come in having done due diligence at the same price. The GGP share price has been marking time from 13 Aug 2018 till Fri, 9 Nov 2018. So, the share price was stagnant and one could buy. Its the 11TH HOUR now prior to whatever Haverion Hole 5 results are going to be. No one is privy to this. So...DYOR Mon 12 Nov 2018
Read Full Thread
Follow
Reply
07/9/2018
04:12		iglenn: In all seriously as you put it, the share price is falling because traders are piling into it, mms drop the price early to allow you all to be naked short on minimal volume. Ask your mate 5pounds....I'm sure he has read a book on it. Only on RNS days do you get caught out but the following day you guys are at it again. And then begin the little fear spreading posts hoping to grab the odd poor investor that sells up. Traders and mms are ruining GGP share price until the real news is released which IMHO is not too far away. Then, I hope your gang burn in hell. Your silence will be the signal.
Read Full Thread
Follow
Reply
Greatland Gold share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange
Your Recent History
LSE
GGP
Greatland ..
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V: D:20200221 07:27:35