Fevertree Drinks Share Discussion Threads

[discodave4] 21/12/2017 22:41

BBNo need to be sorry, have a better understanding now of what makes you tick.All the best.DD

[bamboo2] 21/12/2017 21:57

Hi DD, I'm sorry that you can't take my post at face value.

[discodave4] 21/12/2017 21:50

FDHWas also referring to BB's post 1366.BambooEach to their own, but have you seen on the other thread anybody post "do sympathise with non-fundamentalists"?.If charting was an exact science (not guesswork) you wouldn't be on here but your mega yacht moored in Monaco. There's an element of faith, guesswork, luck, probability, in everything, so please don't expect me to believe that charting is any different, the success is as much to do with self fulfilling prophecies and the balance of probabilities as it is guesswork and skill.........you are not always right are you?, you never post definitively do you, there is always an if, but, potentially and probably........just like gambling really!.Anyway, still respect what you do even if you do belittle everybody else who doesn't have the same views as you about charting :).DD

[bamboo2] 21/12/2017 20:51

Hi DD, I honestly do sympathise with non chartists.

The reason is that I also used to be be a non chartist too.

Years ago, chartists would turn up on threads spouting all sorts of jargon, that I didn't understand. Until I got myself some knowledge I could not comprehend their take on things.

The 'guesswork' comment is a reference to the previous post. I was simply agreeing that the two £28 posts were not backed up by any info, either fundamental or chart based.

Fingersxxd, simon g, and many others helped get me on my way to where I am now.

I do not intend to sound snobby or derogatory, although I am aware that sometimes intonation is lost on these bb's and can lead to misunderstanding.

My form of charting is not really traditional. I use chart patterns, backed by Bulkowski's statistics. This is more than guesswork.

[fardistanthills] 21/12/2017 20:43

Surely that remark from bamboo was just a tongue in cheek reply to sogo's 1391? And the previous 1385/6?

[discodave4] 21/12/2017 20:30

Hi bamboo,"I'm not a fan of this kind of guesswork, and reckon it is better placed on the fundamentals thread where it belongs!"No offence but isn't TA exactly that?, do agree the 28 seems to have been plucked from thin air but fundamentals are anything but guesswork. Have a lot of respect for skilled TA'ers like yourself so would not belittle what you do but you have made a couple of digs on this thread now ("Do sympathise with non Chartists"), which is out of order IMO......somewhat derogatory and snobby too!.DD

[allstar4eva] 21/12/2017 19:41

why does advfn bring out the worst in people?

[bamboo2] 21/12/2017 19:35

QuePassa 21 Dec '17 - 18:38 - 1404 of 1404(premium) (Filtered)

[bamboo2] 21/12/2017 18:33

Go and tell mummy.

[bamboo2] 21/12/2017 18:13

QP, get over yourself.

[orissander] 21/12/2017 11:13

Well ahead and US business very good now that we are controlling it directly.

[wetdream] 21/12/2017 09:56

If the institutions are happy to top up at current prices, then there appears little downside as their holdings tend to be longer term.
Also there seems to be a lot of anecdotal evidence that sales are going well-but ahead of mkt expectations is already a given.
The question is 'How far ahead?'. And howz business in the US?
All imho.

[monnow] 21/12/2017 09:52

Fevertree of `Course !!

[monnow] 21/12/2017 09:51

was passing asda and popped in for 2 bottles of ginger beer, none on the shelf and on request they chacked stores and all gone, so went to waitrose, got the last 2. All for a Bushmills and ginger !

[sogoesit] 21/12/2017 09:42

Indeed, bamboo... oh and good call on PRSM!

On valuation I still have my 40p EPS x 60 for £24 TP. Since my 40p is "optimistic" I don't know how that jives with the "materially ahead" guidance. However, the market has looked at £24 then sold-off.
If EPS comes in over 40p then £24 looks solid but it would be a stretch short term (i.e. for the 2017 year) imv. Of course, paying 70x would then give £28. But, for 2018 post results in January, £28 would be too low on a one year view and I would expect to see the potential for £32 to £35 on an "optimistic" scenario.

At least we stayed above the 200d ma. So the shorter term moving averages need to cross and resume to confirm.
Not forecasting a timing but it all looks to be setting up nicely for January, and the results.

[doctor 69] 21/12/2017 08:48

We need to be quits no our local shops to see how well the selling goes

[bamboo2] 21/12/2017 08:43

Hi Sogo, I'm not a fan of this kind of guesswork, and reckon it is better placed on the fundamentals thread where it belongs!

Of course if it's backed up by tea leaves or Marty's parrot, then it's okay.

Whatever happens, we have this resistance zone [2122-2222] to work through first.
Then 2280-2300 resistance, 100sma, and 2500 ath r.

[sogoesit] 21/12/2017 08:30

That reminds me of Peter Cooke:
Yes, the numbers division, Mr. Spiggott. The right number I like. I like your right number, the number 8. A lovely number to settle on. That's what I said when I saw it first. I said "A lovely number that one." I've got nothing against the number 8. It’s the number 2 I have difficulty with.... in the longer term you understand ;-)

[doctor 69] 20/12/2017 20:18

sogo

it just feels like it , bought fever tree drinks yesterday and they looked like they were selling well

[kiwimonk] 20/12/2017 19:59

Fevertree has a fever ok