Creo Medical Share Discussion Threads

[longsight] 23/5/2010 10:45

I might buy CREO depending on having spare cash. I have always asserted that the price will go up though I am unsure how adverse market conditions might limit that. Hopefully markets will start to improve & CREO will get off to as strong a start as possible.

[newswseller] 21/5/2010 18:47

Suprised at the non existant response today. Looks like we will be listing before WCC, wonder if Longsight will now buy in here.

[mikeja] 21/5/2010 17:26

Doing a bit bettr than WCC,tho I hold those as well.

[mikeja] 21/5/2010 09:07

Dealing in Singapore from 21st June

[mikeja] 21/5/2010 09:06

Singapore,here we come.

[mikeja] 18/5/2010 10:41

Birdman,we may expect an announcement with a timetable fairly shortly,either later this week or early next.Move is aimed for end of June.

[mikeja] 17/5/2010 06:30

£ now 9.79 RMB.Chart indicates at least testing all time lows around 9.50.

[birdman101] 16/5/2010 19:52

Gents, news tomorrow I feel.

[longsight] 16/5/2010 14:25

mikeja - thank you for your gracious response. I will read the update & might consider buying in here when some funds become available.

[mikeja] 15/5/2010 09:40

I think the governance questions are addressed in their update last month.

[mikeja] 15/5/2010 09:38

longsight.on stegs note I unfiltered you.Thank you for the apology,no harm done.I am a trustee of the UK fundraising arm for CCF.Their work is really remarkable,have visited them in Cambodia and was bowled over by warmth and love of the children.Have a look at the videos on the website and we can begin to grasp how trivial our concerns are compared with what they have been through.
Maybe if CREO and WCC work out as we hope some investors will think of making a donation.If done thru the UK arm there is full tax relief.

[stegrego] 14/5/2010 20:29

Someone has clearly hacked Longsights account, as hes being nice.

[longsight] 14/5/2010 17:04

mikeja - I note that you do charity work for the cambodianchildrensfund.org, which looks a most worthwhile charity.

Please accept my apologies for annoying you on here. I hope I haven't offended you. I'd like to say that my posts have not truly been malicious, more a mixture of genuine scepticism & some juvenile naughtiness.

Since I did honestly look into CREO, I might invest here as I have always said that the shares are too cheap.

If you or someone else wd be kind enough to resolve my previous doubts about the integrity of the Board, I will buy in to CREO. Irrespective of whether someone does or not, I will not post any more negative posts here. This has been my only real reason for not buying CREO since they are clearly very undervalued.

Finally, in my defence, I do not believe that I have in any way damaged the share price here since I am sure that anyone serious about CREO has bought for the Singapore price & not the AIM price - so if my posts have damaged sentiment then presumably it has given you & others a chance to buy more at a cheaper price.

Sorry again & have a good weekend.

[birdman101] 14/5/2010 06:21

I think this is something that cannot be overlooked.

We were always going to get a bit of weakness into the change of listing as a few cannot take the sgx-st stock on.

[mikeja] 14/5/2010 06:13

Taking into account the fall in £ against RMB I reckon nav around £9.90 on basis Singapore valuation.UK gov is likely to let £ fall further and more falls likely over medium term.

[kimboy2] 12/5/2010 13:40

I would have thought a more sensible approach would be to examine the valuation of the assets rather than why people are buying or selling the shares.

[longsight] 12/5/2010 13:11

kimboy2 - I am fully aware that REO had to sell. But if CREO are really worth closer to £9 as argued on here, why were there no other buyers prepared to pay more than £3.30? Why could't REO or its creditors wait until Singapoe listing to get a more reasonable price. I have yet to hear a single explanation of this. The only one that makes sense to me was that it was a connived stich-up of REO's creditors.

What I have learnt is that the punters on this BB are easily satisfied because they are so fixated on the discount to NAV. So they don't want to look into these issues - and they just want me to shut up.

[kimboy2] 12/5/2010 12:18

I think the fact that REO sold at 330p is irrelevant. They were a forced seller and had probably depressed the price as such with an overhang of shares.

Many Chinese shares are rated poorly by the market. PMHL for example is valued at 60% of it's cash holdings and has other assets as well.

London's valuation of Chinese assets it would seem is not shared in other markets in the far east which is why they are planning on re-listing there.

[flip101] 12/5/2010 11:07

Yes I've now filtered the idiot. Arguing that REO made a value call to sell at 330 is just idiocy and shows no understanding of what went on. The directors all took a load of shares at this level so they obviously thought the price was very attractive.

[mikeja] 12/5/2010 10:34

Flip,why bother with shortsight,just a wind up merchant,just filter.
Picked up a few at 408

[longsight] 12/5/2010 10:15

Flip - it seems that you believe being rude to me is the best way of reassuring investors on here. But the fact is that the share price is down again today. No one is buying the shares. I believe "China Real Estate" is a name to make most investors run a million miles - understandably.

If you want to encourage people to invest here, why don't you make a decent case for it. Do you really think people will buy because you call me stupid? They need a more compelling case than that.

[flip101] 12/5/2010 10:00

No one is here to pander to your stupid questions. Details of the timing will be published within a week. The timetable for the move is prompt.