Condor Gold Share Discussion Threads

[usmcgs] 26/3/2013 22:37

and stop spamming your charts lol

Sorry for the off topic folks but you really do have 1 or 2 nasty pieces here ...... sorry make that just 1 multi id hugger

Get a life

[saturdaygirl] 26/3/2013 22:17

Double bottom , desending wedge or bullish patterns

[saturdaygirl] 26/3/2013 21:04

Great document

When do we get £10.00 a share ?

[warmsun] 26/3/2013 09:55

Ah...yes...'managed'......of course..!

[v1d] 26/3/2013 09:42

I think that the politically correct word is "managed". You bet!!

[warmsun] 26/3/2013 09:21

We had a 30k buy at full Offer price and we didnt budge at all :(
Since when the Offer has moved down a penny.....for whatever reason, this,seemingly, appears to be being manipulated

[eugene1234] 26/3/2013 09:08

50K BUYS AGAINST 2K SELLS AND WE ARE DOWN 2P!!!

[drradcliffe] 25/3/2013 18:22

I imagine the Regent Pacific people (if it's them) will quickly announce to Mark they are now at 10.5%. We should see a Holdings RNS tomorrow or Wednesday at the latest. If we don't see anything by end of Wednesday, I'm going to assume it was a rollover or someone else. But, I can't help feeling it's most likely to be Regent Pacific given everything that's been going on. I see there are still people who think Regent Pacific, after doing the site visit, have gone cool on the company. The truth is after having been out there to get absolute confirmation of what Condor has, this is now about gaining control (IMHO).

[saturdaygirl] 25/3/2013 16:55

If the 2 x 200 were buys and so close together timing wise would they not be listed as a 400 buy ?

Only a holdings RNS will reveal whats going on but i would not rule out the trades being a rollover .

[drradcliffe] 25/3/2013 16:47

You mean the 2 x 200,000 buys at 10:08. A Regent Pacific top up. A 10% holding gets them a place on the board.

[rame4] 25/3/2013 10:20

just a little top up there.

[steeplejack] 23/3/2013 14:16

The implication is that Regent wanted a healthy discount on the 160p they paid last time,something nearer the prevailing market price.If a tranche of stock at the lower level,whatever that price was,a Regent suggested 145p perhaps 150p,then Regent would have pulled off something of a fast one or however you'd like to see it,time will tell.

[moonshine1] 22/3/2013 15:49

They may have wanted more warrants or to lower the price of the warrants.

[1066monkey] 22/3/2013 15:35

PlasybrynAgree. There was more than a hint the money was in the bag.

[usmcgs] 22/3/2013 13:56

Interesting slant ........Well, after due diligence, maybe they wanted even more @ 160 and MC said no lol

[steeplejack] 22/3/2013 13:55

Well done Mark Childs.Correct decision in my mind.

[plasybryn] 22/3/2013 13:53

usmcgs: Only short term as the news flow this year will see the share price a lot higher.
Mellon & Child are old mates of course and I did think he implied last night that the money was in the bag, so I am a bit surprised.

[blueyonder] 22/3/2013 13:50

Do I remember correctly that Regent were based in Cyprus

[usmcgs] 22/3/2013 13:03

No need for the share price to go down, as the money is not required

On a positive note ......... less dilution

Madness as they have effected their own large investment and if they buy on the open market the share price should go up

[backwoodsman] 22/3/2013 12:36

Chicken and egg - the market smelt this coming. Price fall could also have been interpreted as reflecting drop in price of gold and this drop might have caused the funders to try and renegotiate. I agree, well done Mark.