Buy
Sell
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Castillo Copper Limited LSE:CCZ London Ordinary Share AU000000CCZ2 ORD NPV (DI)
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.03 2.86% 1.08 1.00 1.10 1.09 1.05 1.05 21,476 16:35:00
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
- - - - 0

Castillo Copper Share Discussion Threads

Showing 776 to 798 of 900 messages
Chat Pages: 36  35  34  33  32  31  30  29  28  27  26  25  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
06/8/2021
06:24
"..can't just steal something that's yours already and sell it off to somebody else".

This is 2021, not 1971.

'Tis the way of the new world and they've been ripping us off, overtly and with impunity, increasingly so over the last 50 years..!

linz22
05/8/2021
21:45
PP When a company spins off part of its operation, the existing shareholders do not lose their interest in the hived off part, as far as I know. You will be given shares in Newco & have the opportunity to add to your holding which they say will be at a preferential rate. I have not seen all of the details but they cannot just pinch something that is yours & sell it to somebody else.
taxlosstone
05/8/2021
21:31
If the asset was as good as being described "transformational" it makes no sense to divest it.

The idea its benevolence to ALLOW CCZ shareholders to buy into an asset they already hold seems like snake oil salesmen commentary.

pensionplanner
05/8/2021
18:49
BROKEN HILL MINE
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broken_Hill

"In 1883, he discovered what he thought was tin, but samples proved to be lead and silver. The orebody they came from proved to be the LARGEST & RICHEST of its kind in the world.

Rasp & associates FOUNDED the BROKEN HILL PROPRIETARY CO [BHP], later BHP Billton and now B H P again, in 1885 as the Syndicate of 7."
=====

LONDON SOUTH EAST - CCZ FORUM DATA
A 5 Aug 2021 TRADE HAS SHOWN UP at 17:06 for 8 2 0, 0 0 0 shares for £16,4000!!

There were earlier buys for 50k, 50k, 100k, 275k . Just before the mkt closed the closest deal was for 3,500 shares [£66.50] & 700 shares [£13.30] at 16:23 at a SHARE PRICE OF 1.9p.

I was testing live quote just sec before the close and 1.9p was for sell. So, it would appear 8 2 0, 000 may be a BUY given the buyer had to PAY A PREMIUM at 2P?

The share price ended GREEN so it may be a buy with the price ending 1.9p/2.1p as the spread on the Lon Sth East forum data.

jlondon
05/8/2021
17:31
"BROKEN HILL: ONE OF THE W O R L D*S LARGEST LEAD-ZINC SILVER DEPOSITS.

-The lead zinc silver ore deposit of Broken Hill, in far-western New South Wales, is among the GREAT ORE DEPOSITS of the SIZE, RICHNESS & CONTINUITY." -Google Arts & Culture.

hxxps://artsandculture.com/exhibit/broken-hill-one-of-the-world-s-largest-lead-zinc-silver-deposits-geoscience-australia/XQKCjsU3esTMIg?hl=en
If the link is faulty, then type up the title in the search engine. Click the arrow as its gives a simple to follow history especially of the ore body.

--CASTILLO COPPER - BROKEN HILL LICENCE SET TO IPO ON THE ASX, 5 AUG 2021 RNS/ANN---
I have read the RNS more carefully, especially the geo data on Broken Hill which LIES TO THE WEST AND EAST of the Broken Hill MINE.

"Broken Hill has been mined continuously for 120 Y E A R S. 1.5km underground utilizing highly efficient BULK underground mechanised mining. CREDITS GEOSCIENCE AUSTRALIA " From the link.


I note the copper which is just about 1% cu which is what the EV industry will want. Its in the RNS of today, 5.8.21.

jlondon
05/8/2021
16:03
Nice one - I also managed a largish top up on the use of the word Massive which I took literally. Classic example of life being a learning curve.Nicely underwater now on that top up but I'm not here for the short term so relatively sanguine about the paper loss.
husbod
05/8/2021
15:50
CCZ IPO - Broken Hill [BH]5.8.21

On the London South East, the above was discussed today. In particular, Colonel Drake
on the London South East CCZ forum stated: "Overall, I think this removes the fear of heavy dilution to fund BH with capital to focus on the TBO. Makes sense but only if you THINK you have something worthwhile at TBO."

The rest is also of interest in that shareholders have a choice to buy into BH or not depending on the "PURE EXPOSURE" or "SPREAD RISK" option.

This is the 1st time I have seen Colonel Drake on CCZ but he is a experienced investor as he comes over from Solgold forum.

It is common knowledge that where a junior exploration has many projects on the go, the market will not usually price in the other projects & for this reason, even Paul Johnson is also doing spin-outs to "realise value" or rather crystallise value potentially. Generally known.

Also, Ged from CCZ has today done an AUDIO which is of interest, again, London South East CCZ sourced it first re: drilling results at Big One, Arya & Zambia.

On a more positive note, CCZ SHARES WAS +2.56% AT 1.9/2.1p per LSE.
Looking at the data from LSE [Lon Sth East CCZ], there was rather largish buys. A green day which is welcomed from after Ged*s audio interview.

Thur, 5 Aug 2021.

jlondon
05/8/2021
13:50
Think I must be an oxymoron for buying in here on that 'material' news rns. Material my a@$e
fo77y
05/8/2021
10:59
Good summary pp, demonstrates they don't care about shareholders.
2mex
05/8/2021
10:48
Isn't that an oxymoron. Love that word almost as much as litotes.
husbod
05/8/2021
08:56
Whilst they suggest Managing Director of the new company will be Dr Dennis Jensen, illustrating they are way down the line in this divesting of assets, but no mention of the other directors, where if Castillo directors are on the board, they earn two wages, one from Castillo without having to oversee Broken Hill, and then getting paid to oversee Broken Hill in the new company.

Its clear the board have gone far into the process, engaging IPO company's, etc., and I wonder if this has exceeded their mandate or kept to AIM rules on significant changes to a business.

Now I know this was mooted some time ago, but in my opinion should have been sanctioned before engaging costly IPO in a transaction that is in my opinion not in the best interests of my shareholding in a company which described acquisition of this asset as transformational, and where this transaction is a significant change to the business:

"Broken Hill Alliance

On 30 September 2020, in a transformational move which delivered a large footprint proximal to Broken Hill's world-class silver-zinc-lead deposit, CCZ agreed terms to acquire Wyloo Metals tenements. The acquisition delivers Castillo a commanding ground position in Broken Hill, while significant technological advances now indicate this footprint is prospective for Broken Hill Type zinc-silver-lead and Iron-Oxide-Copper-Gold mineralisation."

pensionplanner
05/8/2021
07:56
I like the 'significant minority' statement, a contradiction if ever I saw one lol well we need the drill results to come good now
fo77y
05/8/2021
07:07
Sitting on a stinking loss and it seems like we won't be hitting highs of 4p again...ever!? Was too much to hope that this lot doesn't become like Mick and crew at Thor mining ffs
scalpface
05/8/2021
06:40
Not sure about this latest IPO.

Castillo shareholders will get preferential treatment to buy shares in a company they already own?

If its that good, why divest it?

Is this spinning off the jam so someone else can make a fortune?

With a potential of just $4.5 (£2.4m) to $7m (£3.7m) Australian dollars for what is described as Prime assets?

Furthermore its described as a 'value creating' situation, but it doesn't look like that? It looks like disposing of a valuable asset in what could be a value destruction situation?

So why are we divesting them at all, as that way we Castillo shareholders don't need to pay for shares in an asset they already own for an asset the company describe as very prospective and a win win situation, which I don't see how it can be described as that, when its only win win if Castillo shareholders own it, otherwise its win for those who buy the spin off and lose for Castillo shareholders who already owned it.

"The spin-out and listing of our Broken Hill assets on ASX presents a win-win opportunity to advance the project and create real value for shareholders of Castillo Copper.

How can this be correct, as Castillo Shareholders will not own this asset unless they buy shares in the spin off....paying for something they already own?

With all those involved raking in money from an IPO, in my opinion we'd be better off keeping the asset and financing it, even if it meant more shares, as at least ALL Castillo Shareholders would still have a stake in it rather than obtaining £2.4m in what is not guaranteed to be a successful IPO, where I would imagine the costs are likely to be near to that to bring it to IPO, with so many fingers in the launch pie, doing nicely whatever the situation.

Better to cut out all those feeding off a prospective IPO and just raise the money via Castillo and keep it.

If its that good, although dilution isn't ideal, we should keep it. Australia is a comparatively safe geopolitical environment, which is not necessarily the case in other prospects.

Will Directors pay be cut in the event of an IPO as clearly their workload would be reduced by disposal of a 'prime asset'.

I also question the validity of the actions in engaging for an IPO when that is clearly a change in the business that requires separate mandate from shareholders before the event. Under AIM rules such an asset disposal requires that to be notified before the event, notice of intent and where apparently advisors for the disposal have already been signed on? Unless of course my own brokers, etc., failed to notify me.

pensionplanner
04/8/2021
23:35
CCZ spin out ANN, ASX.
The Lung got here first: Recommend.

jlondon
04/8/2021
22:50
Broken Hill IPO
thelung
03/8/2021
14:52
MARK BIGGS, LINKEDIN, CONSULTANT GEOLOGIST ETC

Link: hxxps://au.linkedin.com/in/mark-biggs-43999629

Quote: "Mark Biggs has had over 39 years experience...
HE IS & HAS BEEN A COMPETENT PERSON AS DEFINED BY THE JORC CODE FOR 32 YEARS."

"Mark has extensive experience in delivery geological consulting."

==
CCZ RNS*S: At the end of every CCZ RNS on assays etc, Mr Biggs signs as the Competent Person.

This is further to my post above, also today, Tues, 3 Aug 2021.

jlondon
01/8/2021
10:08
Last Analysts coverage was on 12 January 2021
Https://castillocopper.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/CCZ-SI-Capital-11.01.21.pdf
Https://sicapital.co.uk/

noirua
31/7/2021
18:32
You’re as bad as Hazl 😴

How many shares do the directors hold?

thelung
31/7/2021
18:25
PROACTIVE INTERVIEW WITH GED, DIRECTOR, CCZ 13 Dec 2020
https://www.youtube.com/watch>v=GY8bGVOhsOs

Ged talkss about 6 holes. Compliant Resource 3.5% copper [historic].
Mt Oxide -22 holes campaign. Talks of waiting for the results.
ARYA - MASSIVE SULPHIDE.
Title: "Castillo Copper The Big One Deposit beginning to take shape."
===

PROACTIVE INTERVIEW WITH CEO, CCZ 10 Jan 2021
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GtoClsEvrzU
Title: "Castillo Copper reveals latest copper discovery results at the Big One Deposit."

"FUTURE PLANS: GET A RESOURCE - MINING LICENCE FOR THE BIG ONE.
8 PROSPECTS. POCKETS OF HIGH GRADE - LARGER HALO. E C O N O M I C GRADES."
Kathy from Proactive asked about "COBALT."
==
If the link does not work, then type the title. I had a quick listen & I recall Ged also mentioning a Resource but has to wait for results which was then released in the Jan 2021 results?

Have a listen as there are more details but I took a few notes.

So, both directors of Castillo and more importantly, CEO talks about GETTING A RESOURCE?

So, comment/interviews from a CONSENSUS of people eg Ged & CEO of Castillo + Charlie Stephenson*s interview of Jan 2021 [26] followed up by the 25 July 2021
audio interview relating to the CCZ RNS/results of Jan & July 2021.

Awaiting further results. Sat, 31 July 2021.

jlondon
31/7/2021
12:14
BIG ONE, QLD, AUSTRALIA
SI CAPITAL-BROKER TO CASTILLO COPPER
Drilling started in Jan 2021 & Charlie Stephenson, Geo/Analayst/Mining Specialist of SI Capital gave an interview on these results to Proactive Investors on 26 Jan 2021.
Drilling has started again recently due to the weather and the 1st results are out. Again, Charlie Stephenson gave an audio short interview on the night the results were released in Australia dated 25 July 2021. Two broker notes are available from SI Capital, the latest available being Jan 2021 [available on Castillo Copper website].
In the interview, Mr Stephenson stated: "40m, OPEN PITTABLE, ORE BODY ECONOMIC TO MINE." The broker note of Jan 2021 does mention that it is "TRUCKABLE." From the historic overview of the historic copper mine at Mt Oxide, the ore was trucked.

SP ANGEL, #1 IN GOLD & COPPER
They covered the Castillo Copper RNS of 25 July 2021 based on the RNS. share price Angel is NOT the broker for Castillo Copper. So, they have become interested in Castillo? If there was anything to mention specially as a conclusion or flag, they usually would do so. One can conclude that they might have been keeping an eye PRIOR to writing on the co re: RNS etc.

ADVFN: 2MEX STATED: "ITS A DUD." as above. Fo77Y, 31.7.21 has also asked about the "dud" opinion from 2MEX. There has been NO further reply from 2MEX as to whether he is a Geo etc [substantive knowledge] given that this is EARLY DRILLING and it is being currently drilled. Once finished, they go on to the NEXT TARGET AT ARYA which was looked at by BHP as said and they recommended drilling but given so many projects, it appears they did not take it up.

CAPRICORN COPPER MINE
Castillo mentioned this as said which is nearby. It is coming into greater prominence as 29M*s Owen Hagarty has justed listed the 3 mines [Capricorn +WA +Chile] and the mkt cap is A$1bn+. Hargarty was interviewed by CNBC International given the size of the IPO at A$1bn is not the norm at that size. Hargarty BOUGHT Capricorn mine.

LADY ANNIE
Also mentioned by Castillo as nearby. Lady Annie was sold to the Chinese.

RIO, NEWMONT, MT ISA etc
are pegging land in Qld as stated by Castillo ie SPECIFICALLY the Mt Isa area where Castillo*s BIG ONE -Arya and other prospects sit.

QUESTION: I would like to know, like Fo77Y how 2MEX can say "IT A DUD"? Charlie Stephenson, Geo for SI Capital has GONE OUT to the drill [Jan 2021] and he hopes to get back for this 2nd drill. The Competent Person [GEO] signing the RNS and preparing the data and review has a BSc in Geology + Masters in Geology, same as Mr Stephenson. Against this bevy of qualified geo*s with Mr Biggs, the competent person also is qualified to sign JORC - his Linkedin stated he has done so for some 32 yrs from recall with 39 yrs of experience.

Best to have a summary. Of course, as a investor in Castillo , Sat, 31 July 2021 [stock market closed today], I present the above and ask how? What is the EXPERTISE to be able to make such a statement from 2Mex of ADVFN CCZ? Drilling is not even finished yet. I understand that drilling will finish in Aug 2021? So, BEFORE all the results come IN, 2MEX can already pronounce in his opinion its a dud? As for the Capricorn Copper Mine, there are drill results to follow as NEAROLOGY and even then Capricorn has 3 prospects, not just 1. Sat, 31 July 2021.

jlondon
30/7/2021
23:07
Jeez....kinda wished I'd not asked now lolBut seriously, thanks for replies guys. 2mex I see your 'dud' remark is based upon not a great deal more than personal opinion, and jl I see you are extremely attached to ccz with lots of interesting views/links.I sit somewhere in the middle at present, eagerly awaiting more drill results, which should sway me more one way or the other. GLA
fo77y
30/7/2021
21:23
MY POST 745 ABOVE, FRI, 30 JULY 2021

Summary:
This cant carry on much longer. Why? There needs clarity and closure as it does affect the share price only in that people reading will need someone in authority to bring this matter to a close.

So, we, investors will wait if this and that can go further than Mr Biggs who has not been given the authority to reply formally. Only the NOMINATED ADVISOR can do so.

If, it is NOT taken to the Nominated Advisor, then we, investors know its appears to have NO MERIT otherwise why not go to the Nominated Advisor as authorised by the London Stock Exchange with the required evidence?

It would be useful to see if anyone approaches the Nominated Advisor NEXT WEEK. Procedures are set up wherein there are authorised people to do the drilling, qualified people to sign the RNS and qualified Competent Persons including the broker*s Geo/Analyst to do the rest.

NO ONE HAS RAISED that drilling should be done like this or that etc. What if these people are NOT QUALIFIED GEO*s? How do they know how to check what the qualified people are authorised to do?

NO REPORTING TO THE NOMINATED ADVISOR MEANS IT WOULD APPEAR NO EVIDENCE TO BACK IT UP? Simple reason and logic? After all, Joe Bloggs tells the FSA this and that and in reply the official reply is that there is "NO ILLEGALITY" re: takeover. Full stop and end of the constant posting.

Fri, 30 July 2021. I should have come to the above conclusion earlier but I thought explaining might help but it does not appear so? Otherwise, I need not have posted lengthy posts on this forum?

So, we investors wait for NEXT WK. We, investors rely upon the London Stock Exchange and their procedural rules which they have set in place, just as the FSA has procedural rules, the most important of which is EVIDENCE NEEDED of the prima facie type as norm?

jlondon
Chat Pages: 36  35  34  33  32  31  30  29  28  27  26  25  Older
Your Recent History
LSE
CCZ
Castillo C..
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

Log in to ADVFN
Register Now

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V: D:20221205 19:10:05