[ADVERT]
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Castillo Copper Limited LSE:CCZ London Ordinary Share AU000000CCZ2 ORD NPV (DI)
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -0.20 -10.26% 1.75 1.70 1.80 1.95 1.725 1.95 6,880,038 12:28:00
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
- - - - 0

Castillo Copper Share Discussion Threads

Showing 751 to 773 of 850 messages
Chat Pages: 34  33  32  31  30  29  28  27  26  25  24  23  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
05/8/2021
07:56
I like the 'significant minority' statement, a contradiction if ever I saw one lol well we need the drill results to come good now
fo77y
05/8/2021
07:07
Sitting on a stinking loss and it seems like we won't be hitting highs of 4p again...ever!? Was too much to hope that this lot doesn't become like Mick and crew at Thor mining ffs
scalpface
05/8/2021
06:40
Not sure about this latest IPO. Castillo shareholders will get preferential treatment to buy shares in a company they already own? If its that good, why divest it? Is this spinning off the jam so someone else can make a fortune? With a potential of just $4.5 (£2.4m) to $7m (£3.7m) Australian dollars for what is described as Prime assets? Furthermore its described as a 'value creating' situation, but it doesn't look like that? It looks like disposing of a valuable asset in what could be a value destruction situation? So why are we divesting them at all, as that way we Castillo shareholders don't need to pay for shares in an asset they already own for an asset the company describe as very prospective and a win win situation, which I don't see how it can be described as that, when its only win win if Castillo shareholders own it, otherwise its win for those who buy the spin off and lose for Castillo shareholders who already owned it. "The spin-out and listing of our Broken Hill assets on ASX presents a win-win opportunity to advance the project and create real value for shareholders of Castillo Copper. How can this be correct, as Castillo Shareholders will not own this asset unless they buy shares in the spin off....paying for something they already own? With all those involved raking in money from an IPO, in my opinion we'd be better off keeping the asset and financing it, even if it meant more shares, as at least ALL Castillo Shareholders would still have a stake in it rather than obtaining £2.4m in what is not guaranteed to be a successful IPO, where I would imagine the costs are likely to be near to that to bring it to IPO, with so many fingers in the launch pie, doing nicely whatever the situation. Better to cut out all those feeding off a prospective IPO and just raise the money via Castillo and keep it. If its that good, although dilution isn't ideal, we should keep it. Australia is a comparatively safe geopolitical environment, which is not necessarily the case in other prospects. Will Directors pay be cut in the event of an IPO as clearly their workload would be reduced by disposal of a 'prime asset'. I also question the validity of the actions in engaging for an IPO when that is clearly a change in the business that requires separate mandate from shareholders before the event. Under AIM rules such an asset disposal requires that to be notified before the event, notice of intent and where apparently advisors for the disposal have already been signed on? Unless of course my own brokers, etc., failed to notify me.
pensionplanner
04/8/2021
23:35
CCZ spin out ANN, ASX. The Lung got here first: Recommend.
jlondon
04/8/2021
22:50
Broken Hill IPO
thelung
03/8/2021
14:52
MARK BIGGS, LINKEDIN, CONSULTANT GEOLOGIST ETC Link: hxxps://au.linkedin.com/in/mark-biggs-43999629 Quote: "Mark Biggs has had over 39 years experience... HE IS & HAS BEEN A COMPETENT PERSON AS DEFINED BY THE JORC CODE FOR 32 YEARS." "Mark has extensive experience in delivery geological consulting." == CCZ RNS*S: At the end of every CCZ RNS on assays etc, Mr Biggs signs as the Competent Person. This is further to my post above, also today, Tues, 3 Aug 2021.
jlondon
01/8/2021
10:08
Last Analysts coverage was on 12 January 2021 Https://castillocopper.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/CCZ-SI-Capital-11.01.21.pdf Https://sicapital.co.uk/
noirua
31/7/2021
18:32
You’re as bad as Hazl 😴 How many shares do the directors hold?
thelung
31/7/2021
18:25
PROACTIVE INTERVIEW WITH GED, DIRECTOR, CCZ 13 Dec 2020 https://www.youtube.com/watch>v=GY8bGVOhsOs Ged talkss about 6 holes. Compliant Resource 3.5% copper [historic]. Mt Oxide -22 holes campaign. Talks of waiting for the results. ARYA - MASSIVE SULPHIDE. Title: "Castillo Copper The Big One Deposit beginning to take shape." === PROACTIVE INTERVIEW WITH CEO, CCZ 10 Jan 2021 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GtoClsEvrzU Title: "Castillo Copper reveals latest copper discovery results at the Big One Deposit." "FUTURE PLANS: GET A RESOURCE - MINING LICENCE FOR THE BIG ONE. 8 PROSPECTS. POCKETS OF HIGH GRADE - LARGER HALO. E C O N O M I C GRADES." Kathy from Proactive asked about "COBALT." == If the link does not work, then type the title. I had a quick listen & I recall Ged also mentioning a Resource but has to wait for results which was then released in the Jan 2021 results? Have a listen as there are more details but I took a few notes. So, both directors of Castillo and more importantly, CEO talks about GETTING A RESOURCE? So, comment/interviews from a CONSENSUS of people eg Ged & CEO of Castillo + Charlie Stephenson*s interview of Jan 2021 [26] followed up by the 25 July 2021 audio interview relating to the CCZ RNS/results of Jan & July 2021. Awaiting further results. Sat, 31 July 2021.
jlondon
31/7/2021
12:14
BIG ONE, QLD, AUSTRALIA SI CAPITAL-BROKER TO CASTILLO COPPER Drilling started in Jan 2021 & Charlie Stephenson, Geo/Analayst/Mining Specialist of SI Capital gave an interview on these results to Proactive Investors on 26 Jan 2021. Drilling has started again recently due to the weather and the 1st results are out. Again, Charlie Stephenson gave an audio short interview on the night the results were released in Australia dated 25 July 2021. Two broker notes are available from SI Capital, the latest available being Jan 2021 [available on Castillo Copper website]. In the interview, Mr Stephenson stated: "40m, OPEN PITTABLE, ORE BODY ECONOMIC TO MINE." The broker note of Jan 2021 does mention that it is "TRUCKABLE." From the historic overview of the historic copper mine at Mt Oxide, the ore was trucked. SP ANGEL, #1 IN GOLD & COPPER They covered the Castillo Copper RNS of 25 July 2021 based on the RNS. share price Angel is NOT the broker for Castillo Copper. So, they have become interested in Castillo? If there was anything to mention specially as a conclusion or flag, they usually would do so. One can conclude that they might have been keeping an eye PRIOR to writing on the co re: RNS etc. ADVFN: 2MEX STATED: "ITS A DUD." as above. Fo77Y, 31.7.21 has also asked about the "dud" opinion from 2MEX. There has been NO further reply from 2MEX as to whether he is a Geo etc [substantive knowledge] given that this is EARLY DRILLING and it is being currently drilled. Once finished, they go on to the NEXT TARGET AT ARYA which was looked at by BHP as said and they recommended drilling but given so many projects, it appears they did not take it up. CAPRICORN COPPER MINE Castillo mentioned this as said which is nearby. It is coming into greater prominence as 29M*s Owen Hagarty has justed listed the 3 mines [Capricorn +WA +Chile] and the mkt cap is A$1bn+. Hargarty was interviewed by CNBC International given the size of the IPO at A$1bn is not the norm at that size. Hargarty BOUGHT Capricorn mine. LADY ANNIE Also mentioned by Castillo as nearby. Lady Annie was sold to the Chinese. RIO, NEWMONT, MT ISA etc are pegging land in Qld as stated by Castillo ie SPECIFICALLY the Mt Isa area where Castillo*s BIG ONE -Arya and other prospects sit. QUESTION: I would like to know, like Fo77Y how 2MEX can say "IT A DUD"? Charlie Stephenson, Geo for SI Capital has GONE OUT to the drill [Jan 2021] and he hopes to get back for this 2nd drill. The Competent Person [GEO] signing the RNS and preparing the data and review has a BSc in Geology + Masters in Geology, same as Mr Stephenson. Against this bevy of qualified geo*s with Mr Biggs, the competent person also is qualified to sign JORC - his Linkedin stated he has done so for some 32 yrs from recall with 39 yrs of experience. Best to have a summary. Of course, as a investor in Castillo , Sat, 31 July 2021 [stock market closed today], I present the above and ask how? What is the EXPERTISE to be able to make such a statement from 2Mex of ADVFN CCZ? Drilling is not even finished yet. I understand that drilling will finish in Aug 2021? So, BEFORE all the results come IN, 2MEX can already pronounce in his opinion its a dud? As for the Capricorn Copper Mine, there are drill results to follow as NEAROLOGY and even then Capricorn has 3 prospects, not just 1. Sat, 31 July 2021.
jlondon
30/7/2021
23:07
Jeez....kinda wished I'd not asked now lolBut seriously, thanks for replies guys. 2mex I see your 'dud' remark is based upon not a great deal more than personal opinion, and jl I see you are extremely attached to ccz with lots of interesting views/links.I sit somewhere in the middle at present, eagerly awaiting more drill results, which should sway me more one way or the other. GLA
fo77y
30/7/2021
21:23
MY POST 745 ABOVE, FRI, 30 JULY 2021 Summary: This cant carry on much longer. Why? There needs clarity and closure as it does affect the share price only in that people reading will need someone in authority to bring this matter to a close. So, we, investors will wait if this and that can go further than Mr Biggs who has not been given the authority to reply formally. Only the NOMINATED ADVISOR can do so. If, it is NOT taken to the Nominated Advisor, then we, investors know its appears to have NO MERIT otherwise why not go to the Nominated Advisor as authorised by the London Stock Exchange with the required evidence? It would be useful to see if anyone approaches the Nominated Advisor NEXT WEEK. Procedures are set up wherein there are authorised people to do the drilling, qualified people to sign the RNS and qualified Competent Persons including the broker*s Geo/Analyst to do the rest. NO ONE HAS RAISED that drilling should be done like this or that etc. What if these people are NOT QUALIFIED GEO*s? How do they know how to check what the qualified people are authorised to do? NO REPORTING TO THE NOMINATED ADVISOR MEANS IT WOULD APPEAR NO EVIDENCE TO BACK IT UP? Simple reason and logic? After all, Joe Bloggs tells the FSA this and that and in reply the official reply is that there is "NO ILLEGALITY" re: takeover. Full stop and end of the constant posting. Fri, 30 July 2021. I should have come to the above conclusion earlier but I thought explaining might help but it does not appear so? Otherwise, I need not have posted lengthy posts on this forum? So, we investors wait for NEXT WK. We, investors rely upon the London Stock Exchange and their procedural rules which they have set in place, just as the FSA has procedural rules, the most important of which is EVIDENCE NEEDED of the prima facie type as norm?
jlondon
30/7/2021
17:22
jl, the company have provided all of the data but check back though my recent posts. It is good that you are looking closer. All opinions welcome.
2mex
30/7/2021
17:19
Further to my post above #742 also of today*s date, Fri, 30 July 2021 I quote: "MT OXIDE project is a HISTORIC copper DEPOSIT that has yielded multiple HIGH GRADE E E C O N O M I C copper intercepts. This dates back to 1914-15 when HISTORICAL MINING operations at BIG ONE are reported to have produced 9 . 4 cu." "In the 1990*s B H P conducted an aerial survey & identified a SIZEABLE M A S S I V E sulphide A N O M A L Y at BIG ONE DEPOSIT with historic drill data verifying grades of UP TO 28.4 % CU from <50m in SUPERGENE ORE and excellent ECONOMIC INTERCEPTS." "Western Australian Minerals conducted a 27 hole , 1673m RC drilling program at BIG ONE in 1993 & calculated a NON-COMPLIANT oxide target of 79KT at 2.2% cu." "BIG ONE deposit was later M I N E D under lease 5481 and in 1997 yielded circ 4,400t of SUPERGENE ORE of 3.5% cu. While the output was sold to a nearby heap leach operation at Mt Cuthbert, mining operations are believed to have been suspended due to the downturn in base metal prices arising from the Asian financial crisis." "The ARYA prospect has also been explored by B H P ...and although recommended by drilling BY BHP, that drilling never commenced." "Since 2019, there has been a resurgence of interest in MT ISA COPPER BELT, with global weight heavy RIO TINTO APPLYING FOR MORE GROUND IN THE REGION, while MT ISA MINES & NEWMONT GOLD ALREADY HAVE SIGNIFICANT FOOTPRINTS." Link: hxxps://castillocopper.com/projects/mt-oxide FOR YOUR KIND ATTENTION 2MEX. As everyone is aware, all drilling etc have to be lodged with the AUSTRALIAN MINES DEPT [GOV] prior to drilling and post drilling results. All results are LOGGED in and the govt dept usually publishes state resource/s deposit details etc. So, BHP*s details at Big One & Arya can also be checked with the Australian Mining Dept or with BHP themselves. BHP is currently the world*s largest miner by mkt cap. Now, as said Capricorn copper mine belonging to Owen Hegarty under 29M is a nearish neighbour [per the link as above I gave, CCZ states so. CCZ also said the Big One is near LADY ANNIE which per online was sold to the Chinese.] So, not as if its in a jungle where its not a mining district and well known and all results logged. I offered the PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE and up to everyone to check further. One can get to the Australian mine dept to check or MINEDAT or any other Geo site which will provide that basic data as above. DYOR. Fri, 30 July 2021.
jlondon
30/7/2021
16:56
Today Fosterville South reported assay results in their Victoria, Oz project. They drilled quite a no of holes but they reported on the headlines ones. The grades and intervals has been posted on the London South East forum for CCZ. Charlie Stephenson retweeted the RNS/ANN so he is keeping abreast of Australian drilling results of the bigger and well known co*s in Australia. Whilst Fosterville South is in Victoria [one of the 2 best successful co*s] & CCZ is in Qld, Australia, nevertheless, Fosterville South*s Director & COO has described them as "STRONG GOLD GRADES" and "LENGTHY INTERVALS." 20m @1.53 g/t au gold including 2m @7.05 g/t au. 6m @1.79 g/t au gold 29m @2.46 g/t au gold 28m @1.12 g/t au gold Whilst Fosterville South*s drill results are gold and CCZ copper, nevertheless, gold grades ABOVE 1 g/t au are considered good whilst many of the world class projects like in Chile are 0.6 per Mr Colin Bird. Rio Tinto*s world class WINU in Paterson, WA, Oz has grades of around 0.45 % CU COPPER from recall [+-]. Even the intervals at CCZ compare very favourably with Fosterville South given this is more of a surface project rather than a prophyry going down to 1,000m and beyond. Big One , CCZ is NOT a porphyry. Charlie Stephenson, Geo and Mining Specialist had said in his broker note of Jan 2021 that the CCZ ore could be TRUCKABLE. As said, Rockfire*s CEO said that TRUCKING can shave off double digit millions [substantial] from a project. Rockfire*s gold project is on the Qld coast vs CCZ a bit more inland also in Qld. Mr Mark Biggs is the Competent Person & Geo for CCZ who signs off the RNS*s and reviews the data etc per the RNS details. From his Linkedin Mr Biggs has and is competent to sign JORC for some 32 yrs although his experience amounts to 39 yrs. Mr Biggs, like Mr Stephenson has a BSc in Geology including Masters in Geology. Per 2mex: Post 741, 30 July 2021: "My opinion. THE DATA IS THERE TO BE FOUND." Earlier, 2mex said "ITS A DUD." [Ref: ADVFN, 29 July 2021 @23:56, Post No #737] As for opinion, is it a PROFESSIONAL OPINION ie that of a practising Geologist with BSc and Masters in Geology with the requisite no of years of experience or is it a layman? It is important given the opinion is "ITS A DUD."? What is the DATA to prove it? The RNS*s have been reviewed and produced by Mr Biggs & Charlie Stephenson, Geo & Mining Specialist has been to the CCZ Big One as per norm and has given an interview + broker note. share price Angel has reported the 25 July 2021 results although they are not brokers to CCZ - no caveats issued by all of the recognised Geo*s and Mining Analysts. The word "DUD" is NEVER USED IN GEOLOGY NOR IN ANY RNS*es issued by any mining co. Online definition states Dud means: "SLANG for anything that does not work or is defective." Its early days in drilling of Big One. Nearby, CCZ stated on their website that the Big One is near LADY ANNIE & CAPRICORN MINE. Lady Annie has been SOLD to the Chinese. Capricorn Mine [Copper] has been bought by Owen Hegarty of EMR, a private equity co that is very well known. The Capricorn copper mine, Qld, Oz _+ WA mine + Chile has been injected into the recently listed 29M on the Oz ASX and currently has a MKT CAP OF OVER A$1 BILLION. For this reason, Mr Hegarty was interviewed by CNBC International given the IPO was a big one even by Oz standard -its on Twitter #ccz thread. CCZ*s prospect itself has been a historic mine so it is IMPOSSIBLE THAT IT IS A DUD given it was NOT A HISTORIC DUD? So, can one logically conclude that the opinion is NOT a professional one nor one from a nuanced and seasoned junior mining investor??? NO PROJECT IS A DUD IF THE DRILLING HAS GOOD ENOUGH INTERVALS & GRADES - it is whether it is ECONOMIC TO MINE OR NOT? No one can tell at this stage until the results come in and there is sufficient to produce a JORC or updated JORC if there is a historic resource.? There are lots of people reading forums and it is fair on everyone to be able to have a BALANCED VIEW. So, the jury is out - is it a dud given there are NOT even enough drills completed yet at Stage 2 or is it a dud because X, y. or Z? No reasons given. Mr Bird has provided a CONCEPTUAL STUDY for XTR*s Racecourse, NSW, Australia based on the historic JORC and it sets out CAPEX, COPPER PRICE etc in 10 scenarios showing cash flow. This has been just modelled. So, without a geo model, a declaration it is a dud does appear to be from a layman with a guess?? Data? Can you kindly with due respect provide the data you quoted? A Conceptual Study is quicker than a Scoping Study, the former of which gives a quick look but it would need to go to more formal studies as norm later. This post is caveated with "IT APPEARS."
jlondon
30/7/2021
15:49
My opinion. The data is there to be found. I am not on anyone's payroll. I would be happy to be proven incorrect. GLA
2mex
30/7/2021
11:07
Exactly, Agree Fo77y. On the 1 side, Charlie Stephenson, Geologist, SI Capital who wrote the broker note/s on CCZ + interviewed by Proactive Investors relating to the Big One, Qld, Oz drill of Jan 2021. This was followed up with an audio interview on the night of the latest CCZ 25 July 2021 results. Mr Stephenson was introduced by Proactive Investors as Mining Specialist. SI Capital is broker to CCZ. On open file, Mr Stephenson*s Linkedin states that he has a BSc in Geology from the UK including Master of Science [MSc]Mining Geology CSM. Mr Stephenson stated: "40m, OPEN PITTABLE. ORE BODY ECONOMIC TO MINE." Mr Stephenson has been out to the site as he implied in the interview and will go out again for the 2nd drill happening now. From one interview, Mr Stephenson has worked in exploration in Australia so he covered many places. On Twitter, he showed that he visited Cote d* Ivoire for IRR. IRR is now famous as they got a JV with Piedmont who will even pay for the Capex of the whole lithium project in Ghana plus other expenses and yet IRR retain a rather substantial 50 % of the project which one does not come across that often. I have already mentioned S P ANGEL who covered the most recent CCZ 25 July 2021 drilling result. There were NO caveats from a No 1 mining analyst house in London?? 2mex stated "its a dud" [now asked by Fo77y today, Fri, 30 July 2021 Post 739.] Fo77y asked 2mex: "Why do you think it*s a dud?" Yes, we, investors are all ears? Fri, 30 July 2021. DYOR.
jlondon
30/7/2021
10:41
Arguments for and against it seems, i'm always open to both sides of the story, I've heard/read plenty in why it's promising but like to have balance. 2mex why do you think it's a dud?
fo77y
30/7/2021
09:36
Charlie Stephenson [Geologist], "Mining Specialist" interview with Proactive Investors, UK on the Big One [CCZ] relating to the Jan 2021 drilling: "Castillo unveil "fantastic" copper discovery results from the Big One. Mining specialist Charlie Stephenson recently spoke about the results from a 35 hole RC drilling campaign." Charlie Stephenson: "40 m. OPEN PITTABLE. ORE BODY ECONOMIC TO MINE. Get back. Cant wait to get out there. Arya-system at depth. Could be very exciting. Exciting coming few mths." Link: hxxps://twitter.oom/CastilloCopper/status/354002646290608128 26.1.21 == The time between 26 Jan 2021 and the current drilling at the Big One was due to the weather as norm out there. SI Broker also produced a Jan 2021 broker note which can be viewed on the Castillo website. Go to the Castillo Copper website by typing in this search title. Once there, hover over Investors and Analysts Reports and one will see the SI Broker Report. They said that the copper ore could be TRUCKED? Rockfire*s CEO enlightened that trucking ore saves double digit millions wherein his potential project is more towards the Queensland coast, Australia vs CCZ a bit more inland but in Queensland. As norm, brokers send out their geologist to the site. So, Charlie Stephenson, Geo & Mining Specialist has been out in Qld for the 1st drill at CCZ*s Big One, Qld, Oz in Jan 2021. Presumably, he will be out again to the site per his said interview? share price Angel is not the broker for CCZ but they COVERED the latest Big One, Qld, Oz 25 July 2021 RESULTS . If they have anything to ADD OR COMMENT ON ANY SIGNIFICANT CAVEATS, they DO SO? This is norm? share price Angel of London is No 1 for copper, gold etc. Fri, 30 July 2021.
jlondon
29/7/2021
22:56
The findings always seem to be "encouraging". An extension of mineralisation? Well technically yes.. commercially feasible? Its a dud. They have played this with the carrot ahead being Arya. I believe it was only 3 diamond drills for Arya. No going back they need to get on with it.
2mex
29/7/2021
22:31
CCZ - Https://hotcopper.com.au/asx/ccz/corporate-spotlight/
noirua
29/7/2021
18:04
Trades: https://uk.advfn.com/p.php?pid=trades&amp;symbol=LSE%3ACCZ
noirua
29/7/2021
11:58
CCZ will remain hoping a major like Newcrest will take an interest. A cherry on the cake would be BHP or Newmont. However, results so far are too early stage but these hopes remain in place so far.
noirua
Chat Pages: 34  33  32  31  30  29  28  27  26  25  24  23  Older
ADVFN Advertorial
Your Recent History
LSE
CCZ
Castillo C..
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V: D:20211129 06:35:16