We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cadogan Energy Solutions Plc | LSE:CAD | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B12WC938 | ORD 3P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 4.25 | 4.00 | 4.50 | 4.25 | 4.25 | 4.25 | 103,778 | 08:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Drilling Oil And Gas Wells | 7.55M | 1.26M | 0.0052 | 8.17 | 10.38M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
14/10/2020 05:37 | Brumbrum - thats lovely. | targatarga | |
13/10/2020 21:54 | Please read this! Big News! It's most important! ASTROGAS LLC (Cadogan's Subsidiary) against State Service of Geology and Subsoil of Ukraine (Geonadra) for Pirkviska License. Decision № 92072443, 06.10.2020, Circuit Administrative Court of Kyiv City Approval Date 06.10.2020 Case No. 640/12569/19 Document № 92072443 Form of legal proceedings Administrative Companies listed in the text of the court document 1) TOVARYSTVO Z OBMEZHENOIU VIDPOVIDALNISTIU "ASTROHAZ" 2) DERZHAVNA SLUZHBA HEOLOHIYI TA NADR UKRAYINY 3) OIL AND GAS EXPLOITATION LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COURT OF KYIV 01051, Kyiv, vul. Bolbochana Petra 8, building 1 RESOLUTION IN THE NAME OF UKRAINE October 6, 2020, Kyiv № 640/12569/19 The District Administrative Court of the city of Kyiv, composed of the presiding judge Skochok TO, having considered in the order of simplified claim proceedings without notifying the parties to the case (in written proceedings) administrative case on the claim of Limited Liability Company "Astrogas" to a third party State Service of Geology and Subsoil of Ukraine Limited Liability Company "Oil and Gas Exploitation" (third party-1) recognition of illegal inaction, obligation to take action, ESTABLISHED: The Astrogaz Limited Liability Company filed a lawsuit with the District Administrative Court of Kyiv with a claim to the State Service of Geology and Subsoil of Ukraine, requesting: - to recognize illegal the actions of the State Service of Geology and Subsoil of Ukraine to return the application of the Limited Liability Company "Astrogas" dated 09.10.2018 №30 to obtain a special permit for subsoil use; - to recognize illegal inaction of the State Service of Geology and Subsoil of Ukraine on non-adoption of a decision (order) on the application of the Limited Liability Company "Astrogaz" dated 09.10.2018 №30 to obtain a special permit for subsoil use; - to oblige the State Service of Geology and Subsoil of Ukraine to consider the application of the Limited Liability Company "Astrogaz" dated 09.10.2018 №30 to obtain a special permit for subsoil use in essence with the adoption of the relevant decision (order); - to oblige the State Service of Geology and Subsoil of Ukraine based on the results of consideration of the application of the Limited Liability Company "Astrogaz" dated 09.10.2018 №30 to grant the Limited Liability Company "Astrogaz" a special permit for subsoil use of Pirkiv oil and gas condensate field, for geological study including experimental and industrial development of fields, with the subsequent extraction of oil, gas (industrial development of fields). In substantiation of the stated claims it is stated that according to the results of the statement submitted by Astrogaz LLC dated 09.10.2018 №30 Gosgeonadra did not make a decision, and the letter dated 16.01.2019 №822 / 03 / 12-19 is not such a decision because as emphasized by the representative of the plaintiff, the decision on the results of consideration of applications, similar to that submitted by LLC "Astrogaz", is issued in the form of an order, which the defendant did not do, given that the grounds on which the application LLC "Astrogaz" №30 returned, not provided by the provisions of the Procedure for granting special permits for subsoil use, approved by the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine from 30.05.2011 №615, and the grounds referred to by the defendant do not correspond to the actual circumstances of the case. №12 to eliminate the violation). In addition, the representative of the plaintiff emphasized that the address of Gosgeonadr was sent a notice dated 10.06.2019 on the application of the principle of "tacit consent" and the start of work on the Pirkivskoye field. The decision of the District Administrative Court of Kyiv opened proceedings in the simplified claim procedure without notifying the participants in the case (in written proceedings), set a deadline for the parties to provide a response, response to the response and objection. .... Guided by Art. 12, 77, 139, 246, 257-262 of the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine, court RESOLVED: Claims of the Limited Liability Company "Astrogaz" to the State Service of Geology and Subsoil of Ukraine with the participation of third parties who do not declare independent claims on the subject of the dispute, on the part of the defendant Limited Liability Company "Naftogazekspluatats Recognize illegal inaction of the State Service of Geology and Subsoil of Ukraine on non-adoption of a decision (order) on the application of the Limited Liability Company "Astrogaz" from 09.10.2018 №30 to obtain a special permit for subsoil use. To oblige the State Service of Geology and Subsoil of Ukraine to consider the application of the Limited Liability Company "Astrogaz" dated 09.10.2018 №30 for obtaining a special permit for subsoil use in essence with the adoption of a decision (order). In the other part of the claims to refuse. To award the incurred by the Limited Liability Company "Astrogaz" (USREOU code 35193263, address: 38100, Poltava region, Zinkiv district, Zinkiv, Pogribnyaka Street, 5A, apt. 2) documented court costs in the amount of 3 842, 00 грн The decision enters into force in the manner prescribed by Article 255 of the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine. The decision can be appealed to the court of appeal instance according to the rules established by Articles 295-297 of the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine. Judge T.O. Jump Link Decision № 92072443, 06.10.2020, Circuit Administrative Court of Kyiv City (Ukrainian Language): hxxps://youcontrol.c It's in Ukrainian language, please translate with google or others | brumbrum79 | |
13/10/2020 21:17 | Cadogan Petroleum Annual Financial Report 2019 pp. 8 - 78 Other events After an inspection conducted by Ukraine’s tax authorities in September 2019, Astroinvest Energy LLC was notified of a tax claim related to the historic costs for the liquidation of wells on the Zagoryanska license. The tax authorities notified Astroinvest Energy LLC that they consider recoverable VAT that has subsequently been used to offset output VAT to be non-deductible and additionally that the subsidiary’s tax losses carry forward should be reduced (note 28). Astroinvest Energy LLC has launched a claim against the tax authority’s decision on the basis of the current tax legislation and related court decisions. 28. Commitments and contingencies After an inspection conducted by Ukraine’s tax authorities in September 2019, Astroinvest Energy LLC was notified of a tax claim related to the historic costs for the liquidation of wells on the Zagoryanska license. The tax authorities notified Astroinvest Energy LLC that they consider recoverable VAT ($3.6 million) that has subsequently been used to offset output VAT to be non-deductible and additionally that the subsidiary’s tax losses carry forward should be reduced by $19 million (Note 28). Astroinvest Energy LLC has launched a claim against the tax authority’s decision on the basis of the current tax legislation and related court decisions and considers the potential for a liability to be less than probable. If unsuccessful Astroinvest Energy LLC would off-set the amount of notified tax losses with part of the historical accumulated tax losses. The disputed amount of VAT would be partially covered with recoverable VAT not recognized as of 31 December 2019 (note 20) such that the eventual impact would be $1.2 million. | brumbrum79 | |
13/10/2020 20:45 | Decision № 91411082, 09.09.2020, Poltava Circuit Administrative Court Approval Date 09.09.2020 Case No. 440/364/20 Document № 91411082 Form of legal proceedings Administrative ПОЛ РІШ ІМЕ (скl 09 вер гол за уча сек пре пре роз Кер В И Р І Ш И В: Адм |