Blur Group Share Discussion Threads

[pyglet] 22/4/2014 09:26

It has been proven that the Metrics on the website mean nothing. Need to change the criteria to:1. Projects that have kicked off.2. Projects that have completed successfully.Trouble is that those headlines will not be very thrilling so resorting to potential projects that might be listed as going to start is much more appealing.It won't wash anymore.

[j777j] 22/4/2014 07:13

22 april 2014 Liberum Capital Blur Group Buy new price target 600p from 700p



$237,827,602

Value of Projects Submitted

[themadstork] 21/4/2014 13:31

I took a few at 270. Fairly confident of a (possibly very short-term) bounce here.

[knigel] 21/4/2014 12:37

Not really - you should see the TRP thread over on LSE - talk about "promoting" a share. This thread has been extremely quiet considering the 40% fall on Thursday - I expected quite a bit of posting action here lol

[yump] 21/4/2014 11:31

Isn't it a shame if you haven't anything to do in the hols.

[twaintwix] 19/4/2014 18:12

yump
19 Apr'14 - 17:46 - 1852 of 1852 0 0


That simply leaves (a) then doesn't it.


..........................


????????????????

[yump] 19/4/2014 17:46

That simply leaves (a) then doesn't it.

[twaintwix] 19/4/2014 12:44

yump
18 Apr'14 - 16:23 - 1837 of 1850 3 1


There are only 2 possibilities here:

(a) The company always knew how larger projects and the elements out of their control would impact the company and CHOSE NOT TO TELL INVESTORS

OR

(b) They didn't know anything about project work.

If its (a) they're not investable on the basis of trust
If its (b) they're incompetent for the business they have set up.

To say that criticism is anything to do with knocking UK business, or knocking ideas is absolute avoidance of the issue. In a very similar way to the way Blur have avoided reality.

The most disturbing thing is that this sort of thing is what makes it difficult for straightforward businesses with no hyped up management to float on AIM.

THAT is what does the damage to innovative UK tech. businesses.


..........................

If they were incompetent why are companies flocking to them to sign up for their services? Have you ever heard of due diligence at all? The company who just signed up for the $15m agreement would have gone through all completed or current [projects with a fine tooth comb looking for faults and obviously found nothing that is why they signed up!



Blur Group PLC $15 million project

RNS Number : 7356C

Blur Group PLC

20 March 2014

Date 20th March 2014

blur Group plc

("blur," the "Group" or the "Company")

$15 million legal project has kicked off on the Exchange

Biggest s-commerce project to date

blur Group plc (BLUR), the s-commerce company, has kicked off the next phase of a legal project with gross revenue value of $15 million.

This is the latest and largest high-value project submitted to the Exchange. Since the threshold for newly submitted projects rose to $5m+ in August 2013 there has been an increasing number of projects of significant scale, endorsing the adoption of s-commerce for high-end, complex service delivery.

The customer is using the Exchange as the foundation for their sourcing strategy to multiple services categories and experts. The complex scope and strategy of the project reinforces the unique ability of blur Group's s-commerce model to manage and deliver large projects over longer durations. In this instance the scoping and pitching stages involved a range of service providers who then carry forward through project planning and kick-off. The project was originally submitted in 2013 and multiple delivery milestones have been identified as part of this process, with blur Group recognizing revenue at these points through the lifecycle.

Philip Letts, blur Group CEO, said,

"This project has huge significance for blur Group and for the growth of s-commerce. Our success centres around our pioneering s-commerce technology and the size and complexity of this project further endorses the enterprise strength of the platform. There's almost no limit to the size or scale of projects we can take on."

Ends

[yump] 19/4/2014 12:27

I would have thought the core concern would be one of motivation if you're sitting on close to £4mln from selling shares in your own company.

[sven2006] 19/4/2014 11:06

Knigel - agreed

[knigel] 19/4/2014 09:52

There is usually an oversold bounce with most shares at some point - whether it will be Tuesday is another matter because none of us can see the future!

[eric76] 18/4/2014 21:28

No lets not let a possible oversold bounce after newspaper hype decide the debate lets wait til the results are out (if they arrive this is aim after all) and see if the gap at £2 gets filled that day.

[twaintwix] 18/4/2014 19:42

Lets see what happens Tuesday shall we?

[yump] 18/4/2014 17:56

Sven

Are you referring to the share price or the appearance of kids with nothing to do in the holidays ?

[opodio] 18/4/2014 17:33

with the CEO still be pumping RNS after RNS out

[sven2006] 18/4/2014 17:26

Only just caught up what the hell happened here ?

[koolade] 18/4/2014 16:53

I've had these on my watch list. Unfortunately it doesn't reflect well on the BoD. I can see these falling further unfortunately. It will also be shorted heavily I suspect.

[yump] 18/4/2014 16:50

Oh come on, surely you can make it a 2 liner ?

[geheimnis2] 18/4/2014 16:48

I'd give this an ev of more like 20 mill.maybe about 70p per share?

[geheimnis2] 18/4/2014 16:46

Lol no surprise to see yump trolling here

[yump] 18/4/2014 16:23

There are only 2 possibilities here:

(a) The company always knew how larger projects and the elements out of their control would impact the company and CHOSE NOT TO TELL INVESTORS

OR

(b) They didn't know anything about project work.

If its (a) they're not investable on the basis of trust
If its (b) they're incompetent for the business they have set up.

To say that criticism is anything to do with knocking UK business, or knocking ideas is absolute avoidance of the issue. In a very similar way to the way Blur have avoided reality.

The most disturbing thing is that this sort of thing is what makes it difficult for straightforward businesses with no hyped up management to float on AIM.

THAT is what does the damage to innovative UK tech. businesses.

[twaintwix] 18/4/2014 15:37

eric76
18 Apr'14 - 12:37 - 1833 of 1834 1 0


Twaintwix, sorry you didn't get to sell at 8am yesterday and were left defending the share price but that was huge volume for this share yesterday and it wasn't ill informed pi's dumping the stock it was well informed market participants who recognise a massive overvaluation when they see it as did the marketmakers who marked it down well over a quid before the market opened.
Now about this cash call?

........................



Or perhaps I got to buy at a rock bottom price yesterday afternoon?

If you bothered to look at the trades you would realise your statement about massive selling by 'informed market participants' is not true. The sell trades were virtually all in three figures the big trades were matched trades if you bothered to look down the left column on the ADVFN trades list you can see clearly that was the case.