ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for monitor Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.

AGQ Arian

0.175
0.00 (0.00%)
26 Apr 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Arian LSE:AGQ London Ordinary Share VGG0472G1147 COM SHS NPV (DI)
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 0.175 0.16 0.19 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Arian Silver Share Discussion Threads

Showing 44051 to 44072 of 45200 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  1772  1771  1770  1769  1768  1767  1766  1765  1764  1763  1762  1761  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
21/9/2015
21:26
SAF - the chart and daily price action says it is not. But what do I know?
charles clore
21/9/2015
19:20
Judging by tonight's RNS, is finance sorted? Suppose 07:00 tomorrow will reveal all.
sir andrew ffoulkes
21/9/2015
14:00
Repairs to Crusher evident from new pics:
sir andrew ffoulkes
17/9/2015
10:50
PPG - one of the safest aim stocks with 10-bag potential!


Plutus has already been awarded management contracts for 5 X 20MW generating sites. Each will cost £5.4 million to construct and are funded by between £3 million and 3.6 million in EIS equity and the balance in project or asset finance debt. Rockpool Investments has managed to raise £17.8 million in EIS funding.

I understand that each 20MW site could potentially generate on average £340,000 net annual profit for Plutus, even if only running for 120 hours per annum.

So 10 sites (the stated target within 3 years)would be likely to produce £3.2 million in net profit to Plutus, equivalent to 0.43 pence per share.

If all 10 are contracted under the Capacity Market, this would add another £1.5 million in net profit (equivalent to a further 0.20 pence per share), making a total of 0.63 pence net profit per share.

This is all well and good, but it is already on the cards I understand that this 3 year target of 10 sites will be smashed in the first year.

I believe we could be more than double that number of sites by August 2016, in which case we are talking of between 1.5 pence and 2 pence net profit per share.

So the price target for the share should be a minimum of 20 pence by August 2016. If this comes about (20 sites plus) the sentiment and probably further institutional investment stakes will ensure that it goes north of 25 pence a share.

So this would mean a 2,500 % increase on the current share price.

petersmith3
17/9/2015
10:41
I assume just because of the mini-spike in silver price?
cyberbub
17/9/2015
08:47
Up 26% on some 200K shares - All buys according to ADVFN analysis -

Was up in Canada - No news reports so why.

* Bear trap
* News leaking
* A £17k gamble - Chicken feed cash to move share price by a quarter.

pugugly
16/9/2015
18:57
11, aggree drop more likely due to shenanigans. 50% down in a day quite a shocker. Unlikely but maybe someone will want their silver, FRES?
edjge2
16/9/2015
15:32
Jim, has gone out of his way, to miss every opportunity presented.
11_percent
16/9/2015
15:30
No.

The share price fall is because this an AIMm scamm.

11_percent
16/9/2015
15:26
KISAR:- KEEP IT SIMPLE AND RELEVENT !

The reason for the share price fall is that the all up cost of production is more than the price that the market is prepared to pay (at the moment ) for silver.

All other points such as the equipment not working to spec, finance problems, management etc are largely irrelevant.

Watching but not buying - Resource is interesting but not viable at the moment.

pugugly
16/9/2015
14:30
6.8

Don't bet against 11%

11_percent
15/9/2015
22:27
This is AIMm, do not get confused.
Nothing to do with price of silver.

If it is a scamm, them it does not matter what the silver price is.

There is clear value here, but AGQ are doing everything they can not to realise it.

11_percent
15/9/2015
22:14
Got thumped too. CC it was a bit of a struggle to get out! CNR too seem to have a fair bit in the ground. Silver bulls may be waking up but yep depends on price and Ag price trend
edjge2
15/9/2015
22:11
7p guys, I bit tell you.

CC, until you get a clear picture, stay away.

You are correct, there is a cash in assets here, but too many blockers.

11_percent
15/9/2015
21:41
I've never seen this company in a worse place and I won't take the risk that there may not be enough cash to support production. So I have sold - for now. However, the assets in the ground are considerable and should the share price fall any further that risk might become a worthwhile gamble. I will wait and see.
charles clore
15/9/2015
18:09
This is 'toast'.... Surely!... Where is this price in old money?... 0.5p??.... Less probably...
npp62
14/9/2015
22:34
Not true in respect of either share in my case.

In the case of GRPH, I held my shares from BIP and in the case of XEL I hold at 70p.

add to which why would anyone take notice of someone who changed his user name on 11 September 2015?

leedskier
14/9/2015
21:42
Don't take leedskier too seriously.
He probably means well, but can't handle complications. When brains were being dished out, the plate cracked.
This is why he ramped GRPH (+80% loss) and XEL (+95% loss) and still claims to be holding, lol .

pat mustard uk
14/9/2015
18:49
I should add that the share price rise of the other company was on high value back to back buying day after day.Not private investors buy a few here and a few there.So is that the game?
leedskier
14/9/2015
18:45
There is a new game in play in the City.This the second instance in my portfolio for a commodity producer, which earlier in the year said everything was going to plan, to then announce that it was in discussions to raise finance which may or may not be successful.And to add to the mix in both instances that there were now unforseen difficulties.Normally Aim companies never tell the market that they intend to raise money. They place shares or whatever ahead of any announcement.Is this advance notice a Canadian requirement?The other company made an out of the blue announcement in June.Each company has different brokers, but the same draftsman could have penned both RNS.Has the other company actually raised any money or provided a update since early June?Well in a very positive RNS in mid summer it commented that it was still considering whether to raise finance, but nothing since.What is interesting about the other company is that the market has become bored with waiting and its share price having fallen post announcement, has risen more than 65% over the last three weeks, without any news at all.I looked at the last trading update for AGQ posted earlier in the year. The company has the same amount of cash now that it had then.And what of the $2 million+ owed to the company for sales tax?
leedskier
14/9/2015
17:52
How's it going going guys.

I assume everyone has sold up.

11_percent
14/9/2015
17:49
$2.174 million.
leedskier
Chat Pages: Latest  1772  1771  1770  1769  1768  1767  1766  1765  1764  1763  1762  1761  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock