We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arian | LSE:AGQ | London | Ordinary Share | VGG0472G1147 | COM SHS NPV (DI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.175 | 0.16 | 0.19 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
21/9/2015 21:26 | SAF - the chart and daily price action says it is not. But what do I know? | charles clore | |
21/9/2015 19:20 | Judging by tonight's RNS, is finance sorted? Suppose 07:00 tomorrow will reveal all. | sir andrew ffoulkes | |
21/9/2015 14:00 | Repairs to Crusher evident from new pics: | sir andrew ffoulkes | |
17/9/2015 10:50 | PPG - one of the safest aim stocks with 10-bag potential! Plutus has already been awarded management contracts for 5 X 20MW generating sites. Each will cost Â&Acir I understand that each 20MW site could potentially generate on average Â&Acir So 10 sites (the stated target within 3 years)would be likely to produce Â&Acir If all 10 are contracted under the Capacity Market, this would add another Â&Acir This is all well and good, but it is already on the cards I understand that this 3 year target of 10 sites will be smashed in the first year. I believe we could be more than double that number of sites by August 2016, in which case we are talking of between 1.5 pence and 2 pence net profit per share. So the price target for the share should be a minimum of 20 pence by August 2016. If this comes about (20 sites plus) the sentiment and probably further institutional investment stakes will ensure that it goes north of 25 pence a share. So this would mean a 2,500 % increase on the current share price. | petersmith3 | |
17/9/2015 10:41 | I assume just because of the mini-spike in silver price? | cyberbub | |
17/9/2015 08:47 | Up 26% on some 200K shares - All buys according to ADVFN analysis - Was up in Canada - No news reports so why. * Bear trap * News leaking * A £17k gamble - Chicken feed cash to move share price by a quarter. | pugugly | |
16/9/2015 18:57 | 11, aggree drop more likely due to shenanigans. 50% down in a day quite a shocker. Unlikely but maybe someone will want their silver, FRES? | edjge2 | |
16/9/2015 15:32 | Jim, has gone out of his way, to miss every opportunity presented. | 11_percent | |
16/9/2015 15:30 | No. The share price fall is because this an AIMm scamm. | 11_percent | |
16/9/2015 15:26 | KISAR:- KEEP IT SIMPLE AND RELEVENT ! The reason for the share price fall is that the all up cost of production is more than the price that the market is prepared to pay (at the moment ) for silver. All other points such as the equipment not working to spec, finance problems, management etc are largely irrelevant. Watching but not buying - Resource is interesting but not viable at the moment. | pugugly | |
16/9/2015 14:30 | 6.8 Don't bet against 11% | 11_percent | |
15/9/2015 22:27 | This is AIMm, do not get confused. Nothing to do with price of silver. If it is a scamm, them it does not matter what the silver price is. There is clear value here, but AGQ are doing everything they can not to realise it. | 11_percent | |
15/9/2015 22:14 | Got thumped too. CC it was a bit of a struggle to get out! CNR too seem to have a fair bit in the ground. Silver bulls may be waking up but yep depends on price and Ag price trend | edjge2 | |
15/9/2015 22:11 | 7p guys, I bit tell you. CC, until you get a clear picture, stay away. You are correct, there is a cash in assets here, but too many blockers. | 11_percent | |
15/9/2015 21:41 | I've never seen this company in a worse place and I won't take the risk that there may not be enough cash to support production. So I have sold - for now. However, the assets in the ground are considerable and should the share price fall any further that risk might become a worthwhile gamble. I will wait and see. | charles clore | |
15/9/2015 18:09 | This is 'toast'.... Surely!... Where is this price in old money?... 0.5p??.... Less probably... | npp62 | |
14/9/2015 22:34 | Not true in respect of either share in my case. In the case of GRPH, I held my shares from BIP and in the case of XEL I hold at 70p. add to which why would anyone take notice of someone who changed his user name on 11 September 2015? | leedskier | |
14/9/2015 21:42 | Don't take leedskier too seriously. He probably means well, but can't handle complications. When brains were being dished out, the plate cracked. This is why he ramped GRPH (+80% loss) and XEL (+95% loss) and still claims to be holding, lol . | pat mustard uk | |
14/9/2015 18:49 | I should add that the share price rise of the other company was on high value back to back buying day after day.Not private investors buy a few here and a few there.So is that the game? | leedskier | |
14/9/2015 18:45 | There is a new game in play in the City.This the second instance in my portfolio for a commodity producer, which earlier in the year said everything was going to plan, to then announce that it was in discussions to raise finance which may or may not be successful.And to add to the mix in both instances that there were now unforseen difficulties.Normall | leedskier | |
14/9/2015 17:52 | How's it going going guys. I assume everyone has sold up. | 11_percent | |
14/9/2015 17:49 | $2.174 million. | leedskier |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions