We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amur Minerals Corporation | LSE:AMC | London | Ordinary Share | VGG042401007 | ORD NPV |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.09 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mineral Royalty Traders | 0 | -3.01M | -0.0022 | -0.41 | 1.25M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
22/3/2018 17:41 | We made this week 120.000 pounds. Easter bonus 8.000 pounds p.p. N | nooky bear | |
22/3/2018 13:31 | Definite possibilties possibly suffering antirussian sentiment. 4.5 would be nice. | edjge2 | |
22/3/2018 11:47 | Thanks, nooky. 'The general public holds a substantial 98.16% stake in AMC, making it a highly popular stock among retail investors. This size of ownership gives retail investors collective power in deciding on major policy decisions such as executive compensation, appointment of directors and acquisitions of businesses. This level of ownership gives retail investors the power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and potential acquisitions. This is a positive sign for an investor who wants to be involved in key decision-making of the company.' | peawacks | |
22/3/2018 11:37 | hxxps://simplywall.s | nooky bear | |
22/3/2018 09:24 | Assured supply is always vital as we know. | madengland_ | |
22/3/2018 08:47 | Better battery technology could wipe $5000-$7000 off the price of an EV. Wow ! | peawacks | |
22/3/2018 08:39 | Yes, Mad, the thing coming across now is the different battery technology for different uses. Many new types are years or even decades away. I think our commodities are safe for now, but things are very much open to change.Manufacturers have to work with what they have now ! | peawacks | |
22/3/2018 08:24 | Just had a skim pea, thanks for posting. One to read on the sofa with a cuppa.One thing I think will happen over the years is the emergence of different solutions for different uses. The big difference between this change and that of the combustion engine replacing the horse, is the materials. Lithium, Cobalt are two materials that are not abundant, where Nickel is more so. That said, where we run cars on petrol or diesel, lorries on diesel and jets on aviation fuel, I think we will see many different forms of battery. Economics will drive the development, and within that there will be many trade offs. The whole environmental picture will also drive much thinking, and even out of the field of batteries, raping the planet for cheap NPI is becoming unacceptable. Energy storage is something that is going to go way beyond EV as we learn to utilise the sun, wind and waves more. Sustainable energy needs lots of storage, Nickel I am confident will play it's part. Let's hope Potanin wins the Nornickel battle, he will be opening the cheque book, maybe we will benefit? Am sure he would not want to lose market share to the Chinese in his back yard | madengland_ | |
22/3/2018 08:00 | hxxp://wardsauto.com This is of interest. | peawacks | |
21/3/2018 22:50 | AMC website updated,well worth to read:) | tadastadska | |
21/3/2018 16:07 | Agreed. My rough on this one is....from the back of a bumpy cab ride in the heatCapex costs to get the mine running and potentially smelters etc + Road cost - any future infrastructure funding + purchase price for AMC = IRR of 25% I use 25% purely as an example, giving a 4 year loan payback. The mine plan will be designed to max the early years cash flow. The undrilled exploration potential adds to the prize for our purchaser. Its easy to see early years ebitda of over 750m, maybe by some margin. So I can see a price tag for AMC over 1bn being very accretive for say Jinchuan. | madengland_ | |
21/3/2018 15:59 | derampers - just read again and again,and again...!!!PRIORITY PROJECT!!! What do you need to realize the potential? First, in order to realize the potential of the Amur Region in the part of creating the VRMW, to continue the implementation of priority projects in the region: The center for extraction of minerals is determined by the development of mining and processing of iron ore, coal, gold, nickel: Development of new gold deposits of the Selemdzhinsky region; Development of the cobalt-copper-nickel deposit "Kun-Magnier", located in the north-eastern part of the Zeya district. There are prospects for the development of the Garinsky iron ore deposit; | tadastadska | |
21/3/2018 15:57 | Search/phrase/Amur/k | tadastadska | |
21/3/2018 15:02 | Was just working out a approximate Gross NPV value, without all the exact details I guess the PEA released in about 12 weeks (someone mentioned that in the LSE board) will give us a better insight Whatever way you cut the mustard here, $20b IGV is huge We are trading at 0.25% of the $14B IGV | euclid5 | |
21/3/2018 14:00 | had a few, seems amc have just what china need and base metals have been moving up, wether they'll ever get an once of metal out is another thing. Moving up 7% after the doldrums. | edjge2 | |
21/3/2018 13:53 | Euclid interesting thought. My understanding of the economics here is that the IRR in the first 5-7 years is the critical figure. Of course the overall value of the metal in the ground over the life of the mine matters, but the loan repayment years are very much determinants | madengland_ | |
21/3/2018 13:08 | Interesting euclid5 but not sure how accurate my numbers are. If the price of Nickel recovers it would have a massive impact on the numbers. | amt | |
21/3/2018 10:44 | calculating some rough figures on Amt's 50% net value we get interesting figures: $20b x 50% = $10b / £7B Gross NPV div 635m shs (excludes future dilution) = £11 Gross Npv per share (excludes capex / dilution / farm out's) Taking just a 1% value in the ground on the above: £7B x 1% = £70m / 635 shs = 11p | euclid5 | |
21/3/2018 10:02 | calculating some rough figures on Amt's 50% net value we get interesting figures: $20b x 50% = $10b / £7B Gross NPV div 635m shs (excludes future dilution) = £11 Gross Npv per share (excludes capex / dilution / farm out's) Taking just a 1% value in the ground on the above: £7B x 1% = £70m / 635 shs = 11p | euclid5 | |
21/3/2018 09:32 | Waiting for autumn, then is the sibirian investor hike time. Spread your traps and exempt them. | nooky bear | |
21/3/2018 09:31 | Waiting for autumn, then is the sibirian investor hike time. Spread your traps and exempt them. | nooky bear | |
21/3/2018 08:55 | Ok thanks Loganair so thats 1 to 3 billion today. | amt | |
21/3/2018 07:26 | amt - If a company was to sell a mine with the stuff in the ground, depends on what stage of development the mine is in the stuff is worth between 10% and 30% of the above and dug out value. | loganair | |
21/3/2018 07:21 | Loganair it looks like recoveries are much higher than 10%. From the interims recoveries are 80.63% for nickel, 83.78% for copper, 61.4% for cobalt, 59.6% for platinum, 82.3% for palladium, 63.7% for gold and 70.5% for silver. Mining cost at say 40% of the resource (60% margin) so say recovery 80% × 60% gives 48% lets say 50% 50% of 21billion less some operating costs still gives over 10 billion over say 20 years 500m per annum. I am ignoring discounted cashflow but on that basis there is an apparent anomolly in the share price | amt |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions