Amur Minerals Share Discussion Threads

[loganair] 19/3/2018 11:26

mad - Any posts that seems to disagree with your view you seem to think is of low and poor calibre and any thing that Tad posts is of high class research.

Lithium Air batteries are expected to come on line commercially in around 10 years, to be used for batteries in electric cars etc. British research that as usual will most probably be brought in to commercial production by an American company.

Rainbow mining brought their mine in to production as quickly as they could to bring in a income, to fund further geological tests and studies and thereby reduce the amount they will need to borrow whether it be via cash loans or by issuing millions and millions of new shares.

[edjge2] 19/3/2018 11:09

Watching this as feel a few may be good at 4p depends on chart.

[madengland_] 19/3/2018 11:02

...... less concerned about mining anything....... You really can't beat the calibre of this level of posting and research. I tell you what lads, stop wasting your time with the economic forecasts and mine plans, forget the road, don't worry. You three grab those spades and follow me in this bulldozer. Let's go out there and dig up some stuff. Yeah that feels good, look everything will fall in to shape in the end

[madengland_] 19/3/2018 10:58

I am sure science will progress. Those with any small knowledge of chemistry will know why Nickel has so many uses from electrochemical, catalytic to anti corrosion. Somehow I think it unlikely that it's suddenly likely to become irrelevant. At present it is considered a very viable method of reducing battery cost and increasing capacity, which is why BASF have signed deals with Nornickel. Of course you could subscribe to the new magic Chemical called Logan Air that's set to ensure that nickel has no future uses, and the circa 13bn of asset we have rights on becomes worthless. To me Logan Air smells strangely methane like, can't imagine why.https://www.nickelinstitute.org/NickelUseInSociety/AboutNickel/WhereWhyNickelIsUsed.aspx

[loganair] 19/3/2018 10:49

wee - Agreed. It also seems to me that RY is enjoying himself and having fun looking into the geology of the area and is less concerned about actually mining any thing.

[weegeordie] 19/3/2018 10:44

Battery technology has come on enormously over the last 10 years and there is no reason to suppose that it won't improve again. I suspect that there will be greater leaps forward over the next 5 to 10 years (perhaps sooner). The materials used will also change over time, after all, why rely on materials which will run out or are rare? Where this will leave AMC in the longer term is anyone's guess.
WG

[nooky bear] 19/3/2018 10:03

I think cobold can be used for many other things. N

[loganair] 19/3/2018 09:51

In around 10 years time, there seems to be a number of new technologies that are likely to be coming through in the area of the storage of energy.

A little while back I posted about Lithium air batteries, which require no Cobalt etc, they store energy as well as petrol does at the moment.

The Amur mine is not likely to be up and running in the next two or three years.

[seaclipper] 19/3/2018 09:32

That is many many years away yes it may well come but a long way away.

[s0lis] 19/3/2018 08:45

New batteries

RY had better pull his finger out and get Kun Manie up and running before batteries are made for this

[nooky bear] 18/3/2018 12:06

JV between Fortress Minerals and Amur Minerals. You can Google it for more information.

[kumala] 17/3/2018 21:02

Thanks Tad.... K

[hubs] 17/3/2018 09:12

A different take on the prospects for cobalt and lithium prices:

[nooky bear] 17/3/2018 07:58

Carl the Kipper, you are working for rt ? A bird twittered.

[s0llis] 17/3/2018 07:42

What we need is a effective RNS vor the next years. Without a perfect RNS we can forget making money. Send all ideas to Paul and Robin. That would be laughed, loosing all what we have built up. Remember the guideline boys.

[carl valentin] 17/3/2018 07:30

Looked too deeply into the glass? Silly noughty but unfortunately the truth.

[nooky bear] 17/3/2018 07:14

It is not all over. Remember the guideline “every day is a stupid“

[nooky bear] 17/3/2018 04:18

Even More Evidence That Electric Cars Could Save the Planet
SIGN IN
SUBSCRIBE
BUSINESS
CULTURE
GEAR
IDEAS
SCIENCE
SECURITY
TRANSPORTATION
SHARE
AUTHOR: JACK STEWARTJACK STEWART
TRANSPORTATION
03.15.1807:00 AM
EVEN MORE EVIDENCE THAT ELECTRIC CARS COULD SAVE THE PLANET


The latest numbers say that as the American grid shifts toward renewables, the positive impact of electric cars is increasing.GETTY IMAGES
EVERYONE’S SAYING IT: The future of driving is electric. The big-name car companies have plans to start giving Tesla some tough competition. Jaguar’s I-Pace electric SUV will be on sale soon, and Porsche is teasing a new concept Mission E Cross Turismo, which looks like an SUV’d Panamera (in a good way). And normal cars for regular people are going the same way. Combined, Ford and GM plan to offer 34 full electric models in the next five years.

Add to that cities or even whole countries talking about banning sales of cars powered by internal combustion engines: Norway (by 2025), India (by 2030), France and the UK (2040). China, the world’s largest car market, has considered the idea, and in the meantime has imposed some of the planet's most stringent environmental standards.

All this change comes in the name of environmental protection, eliminating the pollutants that make cities gross and unhealthy and the CO2 that contributes to global climate change. Instead, have the people drive battery-powered electric cars, the sort without exhaust pipes and that run emissions free. But the electricity to charge the things has to come from somewhere. And if that place starts with burning coal, for example, then how green is your electric car, really?

The Union of Concerned Scientists has just crunched the latest numbers to find the answer. The results depend on where in the US you live and drive, but in general battery boosters can breathe easy.

“For the US overall, an electric vehicle is much cleaner than a gasoline vehicle, even when you take into account the emissions from natural gas, coal, or however else you’re generating the electricity,” says Dave Reichmuth, a senior engineer in the nonprofit's clean vehicles program. And as the electric grid moves away from dirty fuel sources, the gap is widening. The UCS study looks beyond driving-related emissions to consider the entire supply chain that goes into making cars go. For the gas guys, that means all the emissions associated with extracting crude oil are included. For electrics, the UCS uses power plant emissions data from the EPA, and includes the environmental cost of mining coal, for example. Because different chunks of the country make power in different ways, the results vary by region. N

[nooky bear] 17/3/2018 01:33

S0 you better go to bed.

[s0llis] 17/3/2018 01:22

Robin this bear looks like you. Nice earwig. Nooky...Nooky... lets drink some more Nooky...hehehe

[carl valentin] 17/3/2018 01:08

You are welcome, and good luck with your project. It is not worth imitating

[carbon man] 16/3/2018 18:05

Thanks for the link, I hold these and will buy more.

[carl valentin] 16/3/2018 11:49

hxxps://rais.ornl.gov/tox/profiles/nickel_and_nickel_compounds_f_V1.html
Sniffing toxic Nickel?