We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amerisur Resources Plc | LSE:AMER | London | Ordinary Share | GB0032087826 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 19.18 | 19.18 | 19.20 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
06/11/2019 13:08 | Think this guy hits the head with a nail!! Join the Dots off LSE It takes a special group of Executives to achieve so little progress against their published programme's over a year , 3 years, 5 years and even 10 years. Very special indeed , to get away with it unscathed and still Pi's say they'll be happy with them if they get a simply realistic share price for throwing in the towel a share price that had they performed as "THEY" suggested would look like peanuts, even at 50p would be peanuts. I know this post will be unpopular, probably with CD telling me how wrong I am but facts are facts and the information is there for all to check in RNS's, everything as been behind schedule. Hopefully we will all be released from this with a handsome premium over the current SP, I believe that will be the outcome, that's something we can agree on I think. But what is really scary is the lack of any apparent progress as if a suitable offer is not received (17p or even 20p ish is not regarded as acceptable to me) the current failings will bite us very hard. We've still got up to 6 wells to drill before year end, easy peasy! lol "up to" can mean none, and is often Amerisur code for just that. All the institutions that invested at 25p to execute a work programme presented by the BoD and now seeing the cash still sitting in the bank with year after year of directors lining their pockets, well they must be P*ssed to say the least and ever likely the BoD needed to sound out buyers. Surely none of you think M&P launched their speculative offer out of the blue? I'm convinced we started the conversation with potential buyers. The article about Michinoko allegedly planning on voting against the BoD at the AGM where was probably factual (in the Times as I recall), and IMO this whole process accelerated at that point. So don't hero worship them, the BoD have been hopeless, and I wouldn't invest in another of their ventures this side of my 200th birthday, almost everyone loses money until they decide to cash out, IMO now is the time to buy Amerisur Anyway, having given up on the drilling programme and moving on, I'm still hoping far an Amerisur free XMas, the best pressy I could hope for. | moneylender | |
06/11/2019 12:48 | November figures sofar. | moneylender | |
06/11/2019 12:20 | Hey Tyler, give it a rest pal. | bigwavedave | |
06/11/2019 12:07 | Just when you think the share price could hit 20p back it comes but this is Amer after all for me the sooner they sell up the better. | bryet | |
06/11/2019 11:52 | You will always be able to tell when oil or shale is failing. You will see more articles about fusion imminent, or more hysteria against all things hydrocarbon. So much made yesterday about 11,000 scientists worldwide agree climate change man made... There are estimated to be 7,000,000 scientists worldwide. 11,000 in all probability represents those employed to try to prove man made climate change. Even the 'hockey stick' graph so widely used was discredited after its author lost a libel claim in the US and failed to justify data used to create the graph. You often see claims that 97% of scientists agree climate change/man made. Firstly that would mean instead of just 11,000 scientists there would be 6,790,000 scientists agreeing, not the 11,000? Second, the 97% figure was never accurate. The "97 percent" figure in the Zimmerman/Doran survey represents the views of only 79 respondents who listed climate science as an area of expertise and said they published more than half of their recent peer-reviewed papers on climate change. Seventy-nine scientists—of the 3,146 who responded to the survey—does not a consensus make. In 2013, John Cook, an Australia-based blogger, and some of his friends reviewed abstracts of peer-reviewed papers published from 1991 to 2011. Mr. Cook reported that 97% of those who stated a position explicitly or implicitly suggest that human activity is responsible for some warming. His findings were published in Environmental Research Letters. Mr. Cook's work was quickly debunked. In Science and Education in August 2013, for example, David R. Legates (a professor of geography at the University of Delaware and former director of its Center for Climatic Research) and three coauthors reviewed the same papers as did Mr. Cook and found "only 41 papers—0.3 percent of all 11,944 abstracts or 1.0 percent of the 4,014 expressing an opinion, and not 97.1 percent—had been found to endorse" the claim that human activity is causing most of the current warming. Elsewhere, climate scientists including Craig Idso, Nicola Scafetta, Nir J. Shaviv and Nils- Axel Morner, whose research questions the alleged consensus, protested that Mr. Cook ignored or misrepresented their work. | tyler durden1 | |
06/11/2019 11:47 | Going above 20p any day now. It's like a Beckett play! | donaferentes | |
06/11/2019 11:13 | Shale patch production growth has well and truly peaked. Now probably close to the bottom of this oil price cycle. I think back into $70s for Brent. | knackers | |
06/11/2019 11:05 | come in no 61... er... no 19 are you in trouble? | fadilz | |
06/11/2019 10:51 | Speed car about to be called in... | knackers | |
06/11/2019 10:41 | Full ask being paid now shouldn't take long to nudge past 20 | fatgreek | |
06/11/2019 10:20 | Puuuuuuushhhh | fatgreek | |
06/11/2019 09:16 | It’ll come. Clear as day no shortage of willing takers from those daft enough to release stock at these levels...and at the 11th hour!! More buying off the bid, v close now | knackers | |
06/11/2019 08:13 | Come on Lady Luck, roll me a twenty | lucyp00p | |
05/11/2019 22:46 | There’ll no doubt be more restraining tactics from the MMs at opening as per usual, assuming no announcement... | davwal | |
05/11/2019 22:33 | Time to move north of 20p once and for all.... | fatgreek | |
05/11/2019 21:59 | It is indeed trending up. AMER has closed above the 8 day EMA (my touchstone) every day since 10th October...after spending nearly every day of the previous two months below the line and dragging it down. M | marnewton | |
05/11/2019 20:54 | Well Amer is definitely trending up and we've finished strongly with the bid at a decent level. Not long to wait now. | pauliewonder | |
05/11/2019 16:10 | I reckon so ;o) Very warm now | knackers | |
05/11/2019 15:46 | I bought 5000 pounds worth at 19.42 and within two minutes there were about another 15 trades pushing the price higher. My 25721 trade couldn't be executed automatically by iWeb and 'went to market'. | esmerelda | |
05/11/2019 15:46 | People paying full asking price now | fatgreek | |
05/11/2019 13:32 | Totally agree, I feel this has been the case for some time... | fatgreek | |
05/11/2019 13:29 | The longer it stays stuck at the 20pbarrier the less likely that appears to be a natural market phenomenon Q | quidnunc | |
05/11/2019 09:54 | Come on batteries, turn the blue lights on ffs | fatgreek |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions