ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for monitor Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.

AMER Amerisur Resources Plc

19.18
0.00 (0.00%)
23 Jul 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Amerisur Resources Plc LSE:AMER London Ordinary Share GB0032087826 ORD 0.1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 19.18 19.18 19.20 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Amerisur Resources Share Discussion Threads

Showing 98626 to 98648 of 105625 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  3949  3948  3947  3946  3945  3944  3943  3942  3941  3940  3939  3938  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
10/4/2019
20:26
Doh!

The idiot arrives - all costs in USD, money held in USD accounts produce profit or loss when accounted in GBP!

aceuk
10/4/2019
18:30
"If it's a function of the shift in the sterling value of dollar assets over the accounting period, then including it in the dollar denominated trading statement is just insane."

No it's shift in $ based liabilities due to the payments being due in a.n.other currency (Colombian pesos for example).

AMER sign a contract with payment due in six months, to be paid in non-US currency. They do not hedge that currency risk (as per note 37), sometimes that works for them, sometimes it works against them. The results are accounted for as FX gains/losses.

I'm not sure how much simpler I can make it. I've posted where it's explained in the results, I've posted links to Corporate Finance sites that show how it works. It's called "Transaction Exposure", you might think it's insane, but that's just the way it is.

... and it's the only rationale explanation to the item in the accounts that you find so vexing.

al101uk
10/4/2019
18:26
Moneylender, what I'm expecting for the Q1 figures are increases in production and further news on OBA transportation which I believe will be a big revenue earner.
swerves1
10/4/2019
16:19
“Someone’;s been playing with this stock...”


(Cough) You reckon!? (Cough)

paradores
10/4/2019
16:09
Have been waiting a long time to get back in, got hit on one of the price drops last year, dipped in and out to trade a little over, but feels like might finally be time to hold, if I'm wrong, I'll buy more when it goes down. The weak BoD held me back, they haven't delivered shareholder value despite a compelling story, the put there is a takeover, or if they reveal their well hidden talents then that's even better. Might not be the most rational investment case I'm making but this is AIM and someone's been playing with this stock for a while.
knokke1
10/4/2019
16:03
Only about 25-30pc of Plat wells have been serviced so far though granted one of those was the first to be drawing from two zones. Given that servicing will be ongoing for the next 6-8 weeks we then have the infill well, we could be looking at closer to base production levels - even at these “dizzy” heights. Worth watching. Still more to come from Plat, don’t think they’re by any means done with the N sands either - as past drills have presented more than ‘shows’
knackers
10/4/2019
15:54
Who's talking about share price movement? If you can't stay on topic what's the point. Do you not understand how accounting for currency losses on a dollar only denominated profit statement makes no sense, none at all unless currency speculation is going on, in which case, the activity should be declared. If it's a function of the shift in the sterling value of dollar assets over the accounting period, then including it in the dollar denominated trading statement is just insane.
lucyp00p
10/4/2019
15:09
Just II's afaik

Just realised the share price is approaching my average. The only bright star in the sky is OBA transportation and poss Indico2 for the first half of the year.

The question is will this form a base here or drop further, answers on a postcard?

moneylender
10/4/2019
14:30
Was it a public call or just IIs?
jp2011
10/4/2019
14:05
No excitement from the conference call yesterday then?
moneylender
10/4/2019
13:41
I refer you back to note 37 and the previous decade of results which are all stated in $'s.

Share price movement as a result of currency changes isn't the companies risk, it's yours.

The companies currency risk is primarily in the form of 75% of costs in currencies other than the $ vs 100% of revenue in $'s.

al101uk
10/4/2019
13:33
No risk in $ transactions. They can't be hedging back in to £'s, we never see a penny.
lucyp00p
10/4/2019
13:32
Oh God, give me strength. The published statements in the RNS are in US$'s. When the final year end results are published they will be in £'s I guess, at which point any FX adjustment is legitimate. If the fx loss is due to a restatement of figures in sterling terms, it should not be included in a $ based trading statement.
lucyp00p
10/4/2019
13:30
"FX losses crystallise when hedge positions are unwound"

What would a company be hedging against? Currency risk.

Why would it hedge currency risk? Because there is the potential for that risk to cost the business money.

How would that cost be shown in the accounts if there was no hedge? FX loss.

al101uk
10/4/2019
13:16
"Recording a Foreign Exchange Gain/Loss
When preparing the annual financial statements, companies are required to report the transactions in the home currency to make it easy for all stakeholders to understand the financial reports. It means that all transactions carried out in foreign currencies must be converted to the home currency at the current exchange rate when the business recognizes the transaction."

Paying a cost and recognizing the transaction does not necessarily happen at the same point.

al101uk
10/4/2019
12:50
Converting $'s into pesos does not create an FX loss, it's just a cost of doing business. FX losses crystallise when hedge positions are unwound, which is speculative. For example, if I buy euros tomorrow and not today, the euros just cost me more or less - it's not a forex trade which has a base against which I can show a gain or loss. Of course if they bought $20 million in pesos, and settled the bill in dollars, then sold the pesos for dollars, that would be a currency gain or loss. What transaction do you think can create this loss, because I sure can't find one.
lucyp00p
10/4/2019
12:08
Foreign exchange gains/losses are not new:

2015: +1.23 million
2016 Breakeven
2017: +1.36 million
2018: -2.6 million

Accounts are stated in $'s, but that doesn't mean all costs and all cash are in $'s, there will naturally be adjustments in forex. This year seems like a lot, but I wouldn't let it hold too much weight.

In fact, note 37:

"100% of the Group’s sales are denominated in US Dollars; however, approximately 75% of costs are denominated in other currencies, mainly Colombian Peso and any associated foreign exchange risk is not mitigated by the Group."

Depreciation is a fact of life in an oil company, you book the development costs to your balance sheet and depreciate that away as you pump the oil... or write it off if there was no oil.

Depreciation is up on last year, presumably because production is up. What you want to see is a good margin between depreciation and the value extracted, there, things are improving as the oil price improves.

Depreciation of CPO-5 only started in January 2018.

Also worth noting:

"The Group has two CGUs for its D&P assets (2017: one), neither of which had any indicators of impairment as at 31 December 2018 (2017: no indicators)."

So basically in my view, nothing to see here.

al101uk
10/4/2019
11:47
Swerves, dont expect too much from the ops update, it will only give production details, no financial guidance at all, we are left to guess that ourselves!
moneylender
10/4/2019
11:34
Your opinion might be able to explain how a set of $ based accounts exclusively showing trading in a dollar based asset and with a (presumably) $ based cost profile needs any kind of forex exposure, let alone a loss which is of the magnitude which can only be attributed to speculative transactions?Forgive me but I don't regard a $2.6 million loss or indeed a $21 million depreciation charge as insignificant, as I said this statement is dollar based rather than the published accounts which will be restated in sterling so they must have entered into a massive $ : ? forex deal which has been unwound with a huge and unexplained loss, wiping out a significant chunk of value.
lucyp00p
10/4/2019
11:21
Will the Q1 results be out as soon as next week?
I think these will surprise to the upside!

swerves1
10/4/2019
10:28
Who would have thought oil companies would be so complex! Only my opnion but the said 2.6m loss is small compared to the profit or projected future works. Cant see it having an impact personally in the long run
hsduk101
10/4/2019
10:20
I wonder if our seller was cleared yesterday with those 3 large reported trades. I think management will make another splash after we get the quarterly next week
tsmith2
10/4/2019
10:00
If you look at previous years accounts someone has been doing it for years. I don't recall seeing a loss for it in the past.
moneylender
Chat Pages: Latest  3949  3948  3947  3946  3945  3944  3943  3942  3941  3940  3939  3938  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock