Amerisur Resources Share Discussion Threads

[thegreatgeraldo] 11/3/2019 14:45

Exports in the most recent IEA figures were 8.3mmbblsd.... that's crude, refined products & NGLs.

[aceuk] 11/3/2019 14:34

Seeking Alpha's Wall Street Breakfast:

"The second wave of the U.S. shale revolution is coming," the IEA said in its annual five-year oil outlook report. "This will shake up international oil and gas trade flows, with profound implications for the geopolitics of energy." U.S. crude production is expected to account for 70% of the total increase in global production capacity by 2024, while total exports of crude and refined products should reach 9M barrels a day, surpassing Russia and rival Saudi Arabia.

[thegreatgeraldo] 11/3/2019 10:20

Freudian slip.......

[lucyp00p] 11/3/2019 10:08

My head is also in the sad.

[sogoesit] 11/3/2019 10:06

Reasonable, fadilz.

Schlumberger's a lumberjack and he's ok,
He works all night and he sleeps all day!

(All in my experience of course ;-) ).

[thegreatgeraldo] 11/3/2019 10:06

quidnunc
10 Mar '19 - 17:16 - 17869 of 17878

Climate scientists will also admit that we are statistically long overdue for an Ice age....

...The last one ended very recently.... quite surprised there are so many here with their heads in the sad. Agree with the earlier poster, air temperature is one thing, the oceans have a massively greater capacity for storing energy. Mess up global ocean currents & we're stuffed.

[fadilz] 11/3/2019 10:00

All we can say is fast drill, dry well should be eliminated by now. May take 4-5 days longer than Indico-1. 12% deeper MD, at an angle, and across faults. So like for like end of week?

[sogoesit] 11/3/2019 09:56

Logging first... if there are enough trees in the forest!!
Testing decision later.

[knackers] 11/3/2019 09:52

The longer the better...logging and lumberjacks aside!! d:o)

Balance of probability they’ve ‘somethingR17; to test, highly unlikely dry as they should’ve been at TD middle of last week latest and I wouldn’t have thought it takes long to test a dry well!

[blackdown2] 11/3/2019 09:35

The consensus is that the operator will decide when to issue the RNS.

[lucyp00p] 11/3/2019 09:33

So, is the consensus that a duster would have been announced by now, and that the time taken after terminal depth is due to logging? Or not??

[sogoesit] 11/3/2019 08:27

I certainly hope so.
Although, with the recent discussion about forecasting, I’m cynical N95 ;-).
Let’s hope they haven’t gone fishing and all is well on the well!

The consolidation needs to break... one way or another.

[n95] 11/3/2019 07:38

Not long to go now, news this week is a given.

[kaos3] 10/3/2019 17:35

high correlation does not prove a cause - its that easy

[quidnunc] 10/3/2019 17:16

Fadilz, yes, if you look at the last few centuries then the temperature trend appears upwards. And yes that period coincides with a lot of human industrial activity. However, any true scientist will also be a pains to point out that coincidence is not causation. The link between the two is not explained or proven. Climate scientists will also admit that we are statistically long overdue for an Ice age....,.but they don't fully know what drives them either. My position is that just because we study something and produce hypothesis that might explain observed phenomena, doesn't mean we actually have the proof that the hypothesis reflects the observed effects or that we have the tools to accurately predict outcomes. When Climate science gets to that point, they will be seriously worth listening to. At the moment a lot of the posturing is to try and attract research funds and to get those you need to get noticed. Q

[3roach] 10/3/2019 13:39

Meanwhile, back at the drill site is there anything other than the temperature rising?...

[bad gateway] 10/3/2019 13:03

Do peeps realise that global warming maniacs are so desperate to quell discussion theres one sitting on this thread ready to tick down posts as soon as they're made. lol
How dare we discuss this. lol

Do your worst tickerdowner.lol

[bad gateway] 10/3/2019 12:58

Agree with the former head of greenpeace...

"And so you’ve got the green movement creating stories that instill fear in the public. You’ve got the media echo chamber — fake news — repeating it over and over and over again to everybody that they’re killing their children, and then you’ve got the green politicians who are buying scientists with government money to produce fear for them in the form of scientific-looking materials, and then you’ve got the green businesses, the rent-seekers and the crony capitalists who are taking advantage of massive subsidies, huge tax write-offs, and government mandates requiring their technologies to make a fortune on this, and then of course you’ve got the scientists who are willingly, they’re basically hooked on government grants.

When they talk about the 99 percent consensus [among scientists] on climate change, that’s a completely ridiculous and false numbers, but most of the scientists — put it in quotes, scientists — who are pushing this catastrophic theory are getting paid by public money. They are not being paid by General Electric or Dupont or 3M to do this research, where private companies expect to get something useful from their research that might produce a better product and make them a profit in the end because people want it — build a better mousetrap type of idea — but most of what these so-called scientists are doing is simply producing more fear so that politicians can use it control people’s mind and get their votes because some of the people are convinced, ‘Oh, this politician can save my kid from certain doom.’

[bad gateway] 10/3/2019 12:40

bigwavedave10 Mar '19 - 09:08 - 17857 of 17863
0 0 0
I was unaware of the Obama tweet. It makes no difference to me. I checked my figure before posting:


"Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree*: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities."


Lol thats funny. 97% of global warming alarmist believe in global warming thats like saying that 97% of active rampers on any one stock believe the price will rise.
Thats worse than Obama's meme at least that was from a politician so expected to be duplicitous.

[wbecki] 10/3/2019 12:33

Global Warming scam...

Even greenpeace admits such...

"Global Warming A "Hoax And Scam" Pushed By Greedy Government Scientists: Greenpeace Co-Founder"

The co-founder and former president of Greenpeace, Patrick Moore, says that climate change is a "complete hoax and scam," which has been "taking over science with superstition and a kind of toxic combination of religion and political ideology."




"Suspect he knows more than all of us!!!"

[wbecki] 10/3/2019 12:25

"mad foetus
10 Mar '19 - 11:20 - 17861 of 17861
0 2 0
Agree, just because we don’t understand something completely doesn’t mean we don’t understand it at all. Burning fossil fuels contributes to climate change in the same way as smoking contributes to cancer. To be frank, only a moron would dispute this."

I wasnt saying it wasn't contributory, just that I didnt beleive it was the main cause...which is what GW/Climate changers peddlers claim as a reason t otax us to oblivion and demand we live differently(whilst conveniently they continue to live the same way contributing far more pollution and negtive impact GW/Climate change side than the rest of us do now)

Also, if GW / Climate change is man made predominantly why is no one focusing on the elephant in the room??? Population growth. 7.6 billion currently - 9billion by 2050 apparently.

So end free drugs, end assistance in the event of humanitarian disasters and let nature take its courses.
Why aid those whose populations are already grwoing so fast to continue to do so if Global Warming is man made.

Case in point. UK taxes itself to oblivion, cuts Pollution emissions by 50% ahead of most of ROTW but China builds 2 new coal power stations a week compeltely negating our effort. We are alot worse off though. For nothing.

[mad foetus] 10/3/2019 11:20

Agree, just because we don't understand something completely doesn't mean we don't understand it at all. Burning fossil fuels contributes to climate change in the same way as smoking contributes to cancer. To be frank, only a moron would dispute this. Of course, if the sun went through a major change or there was a Yellowstone eruption that would have a bigger effect, just as jumping off a building will cause death quicker than cancer.