We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Afc Energy Plc | LSE:AFC | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B18S7B29 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 18.50 | 18.32 | 18.64 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Elec Indl Apparatus, Nec | 582k | -16.45M | -0.0220 | -8.33 | 136.72M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
08/2/2016 12:20 | Abandoned thread ? Dolores was sensible offloading when she did. Female intuition and guts. Nothing changed and it really does look promising. It is only time that is needed . I GW was an ambitoius marketing man's target . I guess this won't challenge Microsoft just yet but RTW will get a dividend if he is young enough | norbus | |
05/2/2016 08:41 | someone needs to help me keep an eye on my 500,000 shares that were going to multiply on their 240 kw output, all they have done is go down | khitchen | |
05/2/2016 08:21 | Why would you care? | fredd | |
05/2/2016 07:57 | is any one here today to watch this go down again | khitchen | |
04/2/2016 21:55 | without consideration of the progress still needed for consistent 240KW output and commercialisation of electricity generation for the electrical grid, is not the achieved cost level already attractive for powering road vehicles? | scrutable | |
03/2/2016 18:49 | Interesting reading but the chart looks suspect atm. I'd like to see this come good at some point. Looks as though that may be a little way away though yet. Enjoy thee posts, keep them up. | bam_bam_matt | |
03/2/2016 10:17 | will this reach 50p this year ?? not looking likely is it | khitchen | |
03/2/2016 07:55 | Realistically , no one will pay for plant prior to performance tests for longevity and reliability. Unless the byproduct is being totally wasted the change involves cost, if they need to revert to status quo ante. Maybe two years at the very least and up to 5 years during which there will be many modifications and upgrades. But you need to make up your own mind once you studied the risk | norbus | |
03/2/2016 07:15 | Yes Norbus me too, its almost as if the milestones have become more important than the development of the KORE. Bond in hindsight definitely made a mistake setting a time frame for number 11 before knowing the results of no 10. | holism | |
03/2/2016 03:38 | Now we had 1 tier above 80kw out of 80 , 2 tiers 158kw out of 160kw , 3 tiers above 200kw out of 240kw Limit to delivery and diminishing returns ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, That says singing in the words of Jungle book : We reached the top and had to stop and that's bothering me | norbus | |
02/2/2016 20:49 | The facts :- Last trial 1 tier was 40kw out of 80 . Now we had 1 tier above 80kw out of 80 , 2 tiers 158kw out of 160kw , 3 tiers above 200kw out of 240kw We are now de-risked even further and 1 cartridge was run at 14kw !!!! AB has a lot riding on this with all his options and in the rns he says 2016 WILL BE a exciting year . 240kw will be proven in the NEAR term . 2016 milestone list will come in a matter of weeks (from rns) . Quaterly newsletter coming at the end of March . Lanstead agreement ends on the 8th April . DYOR | ride the wave | |
02/2/2016 19:14 | Time to switch your allegiance to Powerhouse energy they should achieve commercial success before AFC but both will be able to benefit each other in the years to come? Good new buying In PHE today well worth a top up at these cheap prices once news hits it will double in an instant? | warwick69 | |
02/2/2016 15:19 | From AFC web site 2-02-16 hxxp://www.afcenergy | ride the wave | |
02/2/2016 13:48 | I've put both of the mugs on ignore . Wayforward.com BLISS :) | ride the wave | |
02/2/2016 13:46 | HOl... One of the major issues with all R&D companies they don't say what the issues really are. and so we have know idea what needs redesigning or improving. I would concentrate on reducing the cost of FC's, this can be achieved by increasing electrode output and longevity which could reduce the size of each cartridge, one container producing 0.5Mw would be a game changer, whether they can achieve this in reasonable time frame. As we know burning cash can only go on for so long, I'm sceptical regarding further funding which will be far harder next time, shareholders enthusiasm wanes being told the same old story of promise of jam tomorrow . As for Lanstead now they are below 3% we will not be aware what they up to, I know this doesn't really matter to Lanstead who are not complicit with AIM rules. | beeezzz |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions