Hot Features
Premium
Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers
Bitcoin may be on the brink of a major cryptographic transformation, following a newly introduced proposal that could redefine its core security framework.
Agustin Cruz, a Bitcoin developer, has submitted a draft Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) titled the Quantum-Resistant Address Migration Protocol (QRAMP). The proposal recommends a system-wide transition requiring all BTC to be moved from traditional wallets to those fortified with post-quantum cryptographic safeguards.
Quantum computing represents a paradigm shift from conventional binary-based computation. Utilizing quantum bits (qubits), which can exist in several states simultaneously, these machines promise an exponential leap in processing power—potentially undermining current encryption standards developed for classical computers.
According to the QRAMP proposal, once a specific block height is reached, nodes running the updated protocol would automatically reject any transactions attempting to spend coins from addresses secured with ECDSA cryptography. This measure is designed to preemptively mitigate vulnerabilities to future quantum-based attacks.
Debating a Hard Fork: Quantum Threats and Bitcoin’s Future
Bitcoin’s security currently hinges on cryptographic algorithms like SHA-256 for mining and ECDSA for transaction signatures. According to Agustin Cruz, unspent legacy addresses remain shielded by extra cryptographic layers. However, once a public key is revealed through a transaction, those coins could become susceptible to theft—especially if highly advanced quantum computers become a reality.
Addressing this risk would necessitate a hard fork—a significant change to the Bitcoin protocol that makes older versions incompatible with the new rules. Convincing the Bitcoin community to support such a move, however, is expected to be a formidable challenge.
Critics on platforms like Reddit have already voiced concerns. “I appreciate the initiative, but this still leaves coins belonging to non-migrated addresses—like Satoshi’s—at risk,” one user commented. Another added, “Bitcoin could adopt quantum-resistant measures for all coins, but doing so would require a hard fork. Given Bitcoin’s historical resistance to such changes and the maximalist belief that any hard fork creates a new coin, it might no longer be considered ‘Bitcoin’ by purists.”
A Preventive Strategy Against Quantum Risks
The newly proposed Bitcoin migration plan introduces a deadline after which funds remaining in older, less secure wallets would be effectively locked unless moved to quantum-resistant alternatives. While not prompted by any immediate quantum breakthrough, the proposal arrives shortly after Microsoft unveils Majorana 1—a quantum processor designed with the potential to scale up to a million qubits per chip.
Under the proposal, users would have a grace period to transfer their funds freely. During this migration window, wallet providers, block explorers, and other critical infrastructure are encouraged to implement tools and alerts to guide users through the transition.
Once the deadline passes, nodes that haven’t adopted the update may split from the network by continuing to accept legacy transactions, creating a potential fork.
This isn’t the first attempt to tackle Bitcoin’s vulnerability to quantum computing. BTQ, a startup focused on quantum-resistant blockchain solutions, recently proposed an entirely different path. Their research introduces Coarse-Grained Boson Sampling (CGBS)—a method that leverages bosons (light particles) to generate distinctive blockchain state samples, replacing traditional hash-based puzzles used in Proof of Work.
Like QRAMP, BTQ’s idea also demands a hard fork—one that would require miners and node operators to abandon current ASIC-based equipment in favor of quantum-compatible systems.
Learn from market wizards: Books to take your trading to the next level
