An Acyclic Graph is another form of modeling data, and it has its shortfalls. The traditional Blockchain flows in a linear pattern, and different container blocks of data are linked by chains. However, Acyclic is made up of numbers of transactions in a graph.
Although both Blockchain and Acyclic Graph are somewhat similar in that they both produce unchangeable ledgers displaying consensus information. They both send out, receive and affirm transactions. And, that’s all there is about their similarities.
Furthermore, their difference lies in how their scalability. As it concerns scalability, there are two ways of handling this, one can scale vertically or horizontally. Scaling vertically increases the speed of every transaction. On the other hand, scaling horizontally improves the capacity of the whole platform.
The Usual Blockchain Scales Vertically
The operation of the usual Blockchain can be likened to that of a grocery shop. Let’s say in this store cashier carries out his or her operation by scaling customers vertically. This helps the cashier to be quick in his or her operation. However, horizontal scaling will require more cashiers, and more lanes will be formed.
Scaling Vertically is both more secure and easier to put into use. Nevertheless, this has significant shortfalls. On the other hand, horizontal scaling is more difficult but provides surpassing scalability that of the vertical one.
Positive:
– Miners are absent
– Immediate transactions
– Micropayment
Negative:
– Intricacy
– Demands a large customer base
Reiterating this, None-cyclic Graph hasn’t come to displace the usual Blockchain, instead, it has come to complement it. The Acyclic Graph can be an important instrument for the mass usage of cryptocurrency. But, the usual Blockchain will function in cooperation with it to handle security.
Teach yourself technical analysis: Technical Analysis