ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for monitor Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.

MCO Martinco

145.00
0.00 (0.00%)
10 May 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Martinco LSE:MCO London Ordinary Share GB00BH0WFH67 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 145.00 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

2nd UPDATE: Memo: SEC Didn't Return Kolchinksy's Calls

30/09/2009 6:25pm

Dow Jones News


Martinco (LSE:MCO)
Historical Stock Chart


From May 2019 to May 2024

Click Here for more Martinco Charts.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission didn't respond to an ex-Moody's Investors Service analyst who complained that the ratings agency might be inflating complex securities ratings, a Republican congressional memo said Wednesday.

Eric Kolchinsky, the former Moody's employee, separately testified at a U.S. House committee hearing that he was contacted by the SEC only after he went public with his allegations last week.

House Oversight Chairman Edolphus Towns, D-N.Y., at the same hearing, said he was concerned the SEC failed to properly respond to a second ex-Moody's employee. That former employee, Scott McClesky also testified about problems at the company.

"I am concerned by the Securities and Exchange Commission's inaction after receiving Mr. McCleskey's letter containing serious allegations of wrongdoing at Moody's," Towns said. "Mr. McCleskey's allegations indicate troubling behavior that requires oversight."

McCleskey, a former Moody's compliance officer, sent a letter to the SEC in March alleging Moody's had failed to update municipal ratings. The letter also said Moody's had replaced compliance officers in 2008 with analysts and managers who were previously involved in rating structured-finance and mortgage securities. He said he was forced out at that time.

Republicans appeared equally concerned about the possible lapses at the SEC.

The SEC's failure to return Kolchinsky's calls "is unfortunately not surprising given the SEC's failure to respond to concerns raised about the Madoff Ponzi scheme," the Republican memo says. "It also raises serious questions about the wisdom of current Democrat proposals to entrust the SEC with increased regulatory authority."

The SEC declined immediate comment, but a spokesman said the agency has "established an examination program for credit-rating agencies" and is "focusing carefully on the tips and complaints" it receives and "following up, where appropriate."

At the hearing, Kolchinsky alleged Moody's gave a high rating to complicated debt securities in January 2009, knowing that it was planning to downgrade assets that backed the securities. Within months, the securities were put on review for downgrade.

He said he had reviewed internal Moody's memos showing executives had approved ratings methodology changes in December 2008 that they expected to lead to large-scale ratings downgrades.

Moody's Chief Risk Officer Richard Cantor on Wednesday said an internal review showed "the claims of misconduct are unsupported." But he added the company has separately hired an outside law firm to investigate Kolchinsky's claims.

Moody's Investors Service is a unit of Moody's Corp. (MCO).

Later Wednesday, the heads of Moody's, Standard & Poor's, and Fitch Ratings will separately testify about a new U.S. House proposal drafted by Rep. Paul Kanjorski, D-Pa., who is a senior lawmaker on the House Financial Services Committee.

That bill goes further than an Obama administration proposal by imposing stronger legal liability standards on credit raters to hold them more accountable for the accuracy of their ratings.

The legislation would change the pleading standards in private securities litigation cases to make it easier for investors to sue. And it would allow the SEC to take civil action against raters. A controversial component of the bill would create a collective liability regime that would force nationally designated firms to be held responsible for each other's actions.

All three of the companies are planning to criticize that section of the bill, saying it would be harmful and unfair to the industry.

-By Sarah N. Lynch, Dow Jones Newswires; 202-862-6634; sarah.lynch@dowjones.com

 
 

1 Year Martinco Chart

1 Year Martinco Chart

1 Month Martinco Chart

1 Month Martinco Chart

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock