We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ridge Mining | RDG | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 87.25 | 01:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87.25 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 27/7/2012 18:13 by buywell2 Aquarius .... not done too good has it ?DavidHP 28 Jul'09 - 01:49 - 14974 of 14999 Why? Because we're now living through the greatest financial catastrophe in financial history... more money is going up in smoke, a bigger percentage of the world's wealth is subliming at this time than ever before. IMHobservation 1929 was smaller & less catastrophic (and yes I HAVE read Galbraith AND Kindleberger FYI!) than this and as equities were then, so they are now; ie. CHEAP! And then, as now, few could take advantage of that obvious bonanza of cheap stocks since most investors had had 22 shades of shab knocked out of them... I want as many AQP as I can get my pauperish mitts on for as little additional outlay as is humanly possible. If a few pennies now makes me a couple of quid 2yrs later... I'm filled with joy! As for the rest... In my experience, given the general level of hollowheadedness apparent in so-called official and financial services, perhaps the only sector of UK industry where those with the IQs of garden furniture can truly excel, it's the "strangers on a BB" who; a) seem to know more about whats going on than those paid to know... (must be the DYOR ethos + the 22 shades!) b) have little to gain/lose from the advice and so it tends to be more honest. Other than pouring for hours over largely unintelligible reams of corporate gibberish which was written to be unintelligible, I find asking "strangers on a BB" *IS* DoingYOR... where the Y is *your*, as in that which you have discovered and, from the kindness of your claret-hardened heart, wish to share with mere me! How do you DYOR? Remote viewing, perhaps? As a shareholder of RDG, I only waste one share (or so it appears)... since my holding is amost exactly divisible by the conversion ratio. The so called 'arbitrage' was a temporary affair and has now largely evaporated. np I will become, as we all will, Aquarius shareholders and so all is good in the world... Rejoice and sing for the British summer is upon us. My wellies are drying by the door as I write... DYOLaundry Been a bummer if you kept the shares |
Posted at 04/12/2010 18:52 by drbeng Let's get RDG up and running again. Come on guys, don't lose heart, I think they can get over whatever difficulties it is they're suffering :) |
Posted at 01/12/2010 22:12 by drbeng How's RDG doing. Thinking of buying some |
Posted at 31/7/2009 09:23 by laserdisc i reckon 86.25p rdg website now gone |
Posted at 31/7/2009 08:36 by rich1967 What was the closing price for RDG ? |
Posted at 30/7/2009 16:59 by drewz Goodbye RDG and thanks to all long-term RDG enthusiasts for your comments and contributions over recent years. The end of a long frustrating saga with RDG, but the opening of a new and hopefully exciting chapter with AQP. See you all over there. |
Posted at 28/7/2009 01:49 by davidhp Why? Because we're now living through the greatest financial catastrophe in financial history... more money is going up in smoke, a bigger percentage of the world's wealth is subliming at this time than ever before. IMHobservation 1929 was smaller & less catastrophic (and yes I HAVE read Galbraith AND Kindleberger FYI!) than this and as equities were then, so they are now; ie. CHEAP! And then, as now, few could take advantage of that obvious bonanza of cheap stocks since most investors had had 22 shades of shab knocked out of them... I want as many AQP as I can get my pauperish mitts on for as little additional outlay as is humanly possible. If a few pennies now makes me a couple of quid 2yrs later... I'm filled with joy!As for the rest... In my experience, given the general level of hollowheadedness apparent in so-called official and financial services, perhaps the only sector of UK industry where those with the IQs of garden furniture can truly excel, it's the "strangers on a BB" who; a) seem to know more about whats going on than those paid to know... (must be the DYOR ethos + the 22 shades!) b) have little to gain/lose from the advice and so it tends to be more honest. Other than pouring for hours over largely unintelligible reams of corporate gibberish which was written to be unintelligible, I find asking "strangers on a BB" *IS* DoingYOR... where the Y is *your*, as in that which you have discovered and, from the kindness of your claret-hardened heart, wish to share with mere me! How do you DYOR? Remote viewing, perhaps? As a shareholder of RDG, I only waste one share (or so it appears)... since my holding is amost exactly divisible by the conversion ratio. The so called 'arbitrage' was a temporary affair and has now largely evaporated. np I will become, as we all will, Aquarius shareholders and so all is good in the world... Rejoice and sing for the British summer is upon us. My wellies are drying by the door as I write... DYOLaundry |
Posted at 26/2/2009 10:48 by perfect choice Exactly rootcodd, additional shares to be placed or extension of debt arrangements and I expect RDG to take the majority of the $40M since Imbani will have limited scope for refinancing to generate funds fot the 50/50 joint venture.Well it looks like euro has wound up a few posters here! He has been a long trem holder of RDG in substantial numbers but certainly seems to have changed attitude recently. I take the view that the risks with RDG are not really being appreciated by some posters I have to say. I saw RDG as a relatively safe bet with little cash risk long term. That has now changed with BR needing an additional $40M and further risk moving forward IMHO. Still plan to buy in again at a suitable time but will do on a higher risk view to RDG fortunes. |
Posted at 18/2/2009 13:50 by the metal man If you were planning to, it doesn't make sense for investors wanting to buy AQP to do so directly at present if they are prepared to take the risk with RDG. However, as GS points out, both could drop back in the face of a deal collapse, that's the market for you. It might be better to fathom the bottom of AQP with RDG lagging behind, before buying RDG. For instance, should AQP retrace to around 150p and you considered that was the bottom, in the event RDG would presumably retrace to around 45p or so. If that was so then yes, you would buy RDG. |
Posted at 18/2/2009 08:17 by perfect choice Like AD I will be accepting this offer. As a long standing RDG holder I'll be disappointed RDG could deliver on its own the BR and SR assets. But in today's market and SR some way off (around 5 years I would say with price recovery for nickel), I would much prefer to have some of the eventual value RDG assets can deliver today rather than waiting at least 2 years from now (I would say DG will not be above £1 again until 2011). I can therefore understand why RDG management have agreed to this offer in principle.The position of Zijin would have been crucial in this announcement and they must have been consulted as RDGs largest share holder. For all the views of the PIs on this BB, the major holders will decide whether this is an acceptable offer or not, that is just how it goes. If AQP gets its debt plan sorted adequately, they're not a bad investment anyway, I've had them on my watch list for about a year now. In the mean time, there is actually a good short term opportrunity for a 15% profit on RDG with the current share price being lower than the offer. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
