We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
---|---|---|---|
Partnership | PA. | London | Ordinary Share |
Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
---|---|---|---|---|
125.75 | 125.75 |
Top Posts |
---|
Posted at 06/11/2015 11:16 by 18bt Pretty strong results from JR yesterday and similar signs of life at PA. Money Marketing reporting that 240 jobs to be saved quickly on the merger, which does look as though it will complete in Dec.Intersting article from Towers Watson on DB De-risking market at: hxxps://www.towerswa The Taylor Wimpey scheme mentioned was done by PA, but this article highlights the opportunities in the market. |
Posted at 12/8/2015 16:39 by scrapheap I sold out all my remaining PA early on too in initial burst thank goodness but am keeping JRG.What genius decided to flag the substantial capital raising to follow post merger as part of the actual merger announcements? You have institutional shareholders facing a consolidation if they hold both stocks likely to think they need to cut their exposure (and which I did selling all PA at the 'premium' rise whilst it lasted) AND/OR they know some form of big dilution is coming too and at a placing discount. So I'm expecting some of these institutional holdings RNS to start showing some sales ahead of 2 becoming 1. Talk about creating headwinds. |
Posted at 11/8/2015 08:34 by topvest Sounds a sensible way forward albeit I'm disappointed PA. could't stay independent. Sold out at 168p. |
Posted at 05/6/2015 07:12 by 18bt Panmure are holding an annuity conference on MOnday and reitereated their buys on PA. and JR yesterday in a morning note. |
Posted at 24/2/2015 16:48 by scrapheap No pressure PA. but you need to match JRG's resilience when reporting next week! |
Posted at 16/1/2015 08:44 by scrapheap Given Mr Groves comments on the sub-optimal capital structure, it's all the more clumsy to now not be proceeding.the implication is the investors wanted too high a coupon for the risk they felt they'd be taking. at best this is a PR own-goal.... at worst, this could unsettle confidence in the business. Hey ho.... soon be April and unlike Mr Rodger, I disagree with his judgement. Value protection on annuities is likely to increase and more business will be written than in the current 'hiatus' year. This growth should help PA and JRG as year on year numbers start working in their favour. The risk of these reforms however may be some advisers putting people in to drawdown as you can charge ongoing fees for those which you don't on annuities.... throw in the investment charts over the last 5 years looking so 'rosy' and there's a risk of mis-selling in my opinion. |
Posted at 02/1/2015 09:02 by scrapheap Exactly.... 3 more months of iffy trading and then I expect a lot of business to be written.I'm also told to expect soon new product(s) from PA. being launched. |
Posted at 14/10/2014 13:18 by ochs JRG announced a good deal today. If PA. were also in the running for it could that be why they were marked down first thing? |
Posted at 06/10/2014 14:15 by scrapheap I bought more JRG last week, not put more in to PA. as I view this one as higher risk. |
Posted at 06/10/2014 13:25 by ochs I was holding JRG and PA. but decided to switch out of PA. last week and only hold JRG going forward. Got out at 105p and into JRG at 123.7p. I prefer JRG as I get the feeling management are more on the ball and it also seems to have higher regular trading volumes on the market.Would you average down your PA. holding at current price or could there be further to fall? |
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions