Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Minds+Mach LSE:MMX London Ordinary Share VGG614091012 ORD NPV (DI)
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  +0.00p +0.00% 8.75p 8.50p 9.00p 8.75p 8.75p 8.75p 434,022.00 07:30:06
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Media 4.3 -6.8 -0.8 - 61.14

Minds+Mach (MMX) Latest News

More Minds+Mach News
Minds+Mach Takeover Rumours

Minds+Mach (MMX) Share Charts

1 Year Minds+Mach Chart

1 Year Minds+Mach Chart

1 Month Minds+Mach Chart

1 Month Minds+Mach Chart

Intraday Minds+Mach Chart

Intraday Minds+Mach Chart

Minds+Mach (MMX) Discussions and Chat

Minds+Mach Forums and Chat

Date Time Title Posts
24/3/201709:05MIND MACHINES GROUP72.00
21/3/201723:43Minds & Machines a pure play for TLDs3,529.00
25/9/201614:09Minds+Machines Group Limited32.00

Add a New Thread

Minds+Mach (MMX) Most Recent Trades

No Trades
Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type
View all Minds+Mach trades in real-time

Minds+Mach (MMX) Top Chat Posts

Minds+Mach Daily Update: Minds+Mach is listed in the Media sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker MMX. The last closing price for Minds+Mach was 8.75p.
Minds+Mach has a 4 week average price of - and a 12 week average price of -.
The 1 year high share price is - while the 1 year low share price is currently -.
There are currently 698,753,809 shares in issue and the average daily traded volume is 0 shares. The market capitalisation of Minds+Mach is £61,140,958.29.
milesy: Seems we have acquired a few folks here who joined ADVFN very recently and then post solely on MMX BB...strong troll tendencies I suspect especially when repeating ad nauseum that they expect the CEO to assuage their insecurities just because the share price does what shares prices always do, move up or down.
hjb1: "without news we have nothing to support the share price" Must be the daftest comment ever written on any forum...that prize goes to BRAINDEAD CAAAAPTAAAIIINN....LMAO!!
simonsaid1: hotpotato, not sure why you're addressing USA investor domain as he no longer posts here, he got in trouble with ADVFN for a lot of very poor attempts to damage MMX's stock price by spreading misinformation. As for MMX, today's volume was lower than average, but the pattern is quite suspicious if you check the last few trades: Time/Date Price Volume Trade value Type 16:47:38 9.50 150,000 14,250.00 O 16:20:42 9.50 150,000 14,250.00 O 16:20:21 9.50 150,000 14,250.00 O I've long suspected some shenanigans on the part of the market maker for this stock. Seems a large investor (likely institutional) is divesting a holding in dribs and drabs, with large whole-number sells (assuming these are sells as they're closer to the bid price). It's effectively acting as a near-daily cap on the share price.
ftangftang: 18.75p share price target .... performance conditions apply The options granted to the Directors ("Director Options") are structured as nil-cost options and, subject to the achievement of vesting conditions, will vest on the publication of the accounts of the Company for the year ended 31 December 2019. The Director Options will vest on a straight line basis, based on total shareholder return from a base price of 9.375p per share up to full vesting at 18.75p per share. This condition will be measured against the volume weighted average price of the Company's Ordinary Shares over the 20 trading days prior to the vesting date ("VWAP"). cheers ft ft
simonsaid1: Any positive sentiment from an upbeat results call should help. There was a huge buyer this last few weeks suppressing the share price, and I highly doubt the timing was coincidental. Somebody was getting ready for something.
simonsaid1: Apologies to anyone who saw this on the other thread, but an observation: I have noticed a number of large trades in MMX the past few days, which keep bringing the share price down when it starts to spike. These are generally for 250k shares at 9.25 and all have the trade type 'OK', meaning delayed publication. I don't have level 2 so I can only spot these as they fly by, but I've noticed a few and I'm fairly sure they're buys not sells. This suggests to me a 'tree shake' is going on, with the market maker attempting to shake out enough PI's to fill a huge buy order. The volumes have been high this week, yet the actual number of trades pretty low, another indicator. Can somebody with level 2 check volumes and see if there's anything to this? If it's true then it's a great buy signal. I've been bullishly topping up, fully accepting that I may have to do some hat-eating at some point. Cheers
maywillow: Minds + Machines completes tender offer 08:02 12 Oct 2016 As Elvis might have said had he been a Londoner, "I love m'tender". Pound and share price The shares were purchased at a small premium to the prevailing market price Minds + Machines Group Ltd (LON:MMX) said it has completed the tender offer and subscription it unveiled alongside its interim results last month. In all, £13mln was spent purchasing 100mln shares, of which 57.7mln have been cancelled, with the remainder being snapped up by a subsidiary of Chinese investment group Hony Capital, which now holds 7.2% of the Aim-listed internet registry business’s enlarged share capital. The company revealed that tenders for the regular entitlement of one ordinary share for every 7.56 shares were met in full. Shareholders who wanted to sell back even more of their holdings sold extra shares on the basis of one for every 22.09 shares held. Shares in Minds + Machines opened 0.1p lower at 12.27p on Wednesday morning.
glasshalfull: As a holder of CNIC I keep an eye on MMX. Found the undernoted blog this evening from AVC, departing CEO, that I felt should be highlighted to MMX holders, alongside one of the comments from a former Director. I've no position & no comment to make on the company. Posting as a courtesy. Kind regards, GHF --- Http:// Home / Blogs I Got Fired Feb 22, 2016 12:00 By Antony Van Couvering It's a story told a thousand times: founder of a company ousted by investors. It's a story so common you can find it any day of the week as a minor headline in a tech blog. Not much of a story at all really, until it happened to me. Minds + Machines, the company I founded in 2009, informed me last week that I was no longer wanted as CEO. Without going into details, which I can't, there were differences and disagreements. Still, it was a surprise. All the plans, the hopes — pfhhht! into thin air. It sucked. Now what? New gTLDs are barely birthed. The industry is very young. Twelve million new gTLD names have been sold in just about two years. That's nearly 5% of all domain names out there. What reasonable person doesn't expect that to rise to 20% or more within the next few years? There's a lot of opportunity in the field. And yet there are some signs of desperation out there. Demand for new gTLDs hasn't been what anyone expected. Many single-TLD registries, though not all, are hurting. Many registrars still do not fully support new gTLDs that aren't plain-vanilla .com clones. ICANN continues to treat registries and registrars as unpleasant necessities despite the fact that its sky-rocketing budget is underwritten by domain name sales. No breakout awareness of new gTLDs has yet occurred and until it does marketing new gTLDs may feel as useless as pushing a piece of string. Even so, the larger players in our industry continue to be very bullish: .shop went for more than $40M, .app went for $25M and a secondary market in new gTLDs is heating up fast. Existing registries, and companies outside the space, are on the prowl. Despite the perceived lack of demand, some people are clearly seeing a lot of value in new gTLDs. Why the disconnect? It's a matter of perspective, and cash. Owning a registry, or even better a portfolio of them, is a fantastic long-term business. Those who can't think long term (no cash) or won't (no vision), will not be well served by what's to come. What kind of registries are out there, and how will they fare? Below I've listed some of the major types of commercial models (non-brand) that exist today, and what their prospects are; there are also hybrids of these models. Registry as a technical function, concerned with infrastructure and service levels; this is what ICANN would prefer, but it's a commodity function with little on-going value. Increasingly, this will be an outsourced service with lower and lower prices. Registry as a domainer play: the registry is essentially an unlimited portfolio of names, and like a domainer you can price your inventory, park it, and wait for the right buyer to walk through the door. This model is concerned with understanding the value of each name and pricing it for maximum return. It also requires staying power and self-sufficiency; impatient investors are going to have a hard time with this model. Registry as supermarket. Sell it super-cheap or give it away and try to win on large volumes with low margins. Because low prices disproportionately attract fraudsters, this approach is problematic but in the short term at least it seems to be profitable. In terms of resale, however, it may be a poisoned well. Registry as small business. Make some nice signs, tell some friends, try to get good shelf space at the local store, take out some stands at trade shows, get some testimonials, keep the costs down, and build the business over time. This can work if there are no investors, or if they are angel investors looking for a nice ongoing income in the future. Having a single TLD instead of a portfolio is actually an advantage here. Registry as part of a bigger plan. Naming is part of a vaster ecosystem that includes the branding, positioning, marketing, selling and licensing of companies, goods, and services on the Internet. And, importantly, it includes Internet governance. It takes no great power of observation to see that being a big registry, essential to commerce and communication on the Internet, contributing substantial amounts to ICANN, gets you a privileged seat at ICANN, at the center of things when it comes to deciding what the Internet will look like in 10 years. That's actually worth a lot, but it's only available, or useful, to the biggest players. 2016, I predict, will be filled with new gTLD acquisitions. Buyers of new gTLDs see bigger players coming to gobble them up down the road, paying a premium for size, diversity of portfolio, and market leadership. They think TLDs are still a bargain, even in the aftermarket, and they are out there trying to make deals. If a registry, of any size, is not a buyer, then pretty soon they will either be a seller or a small player. Existing portfolio registries have basically two ways to go. One option is to build up the TLDs in the existing portfolio, treating them as a collection of small businesses, and hope that they become self-sustaining and will fetch a decent multiple of profits in an eventual sale. A better option would be to treat today's highly fragmented ownership of new gTLDs as an opportunity to continue the portfolio-building that began with the first applications, acquiring good TLDs that are selling cheap now, keeping focused on the long-term value. Back to me getting fired. It still sucks, but I'm seeing some silver linings already. I'm going to take a break, re-connect with friends, and consider what's next. If you have condolences, thoughts, ideas, or just want to reach out, my new email address is [email protected] By Antony Van Couvering ---- Keith Teare – Feb 22, 2016 7:45 AM PST I like this article-a lot. Like Antony I too am an ex-MMX board member. Perhaps I am a little less diplomatic. The investors who have conspired (that is the right word) own over 50% of the public company. They have forced stock buy-backs, fake share price support, inclusion of non-qualified board members, exits of highly experienced domain experts (Elliot and myself and now Antony). Their actions are probably illegal under AIM rules about conspiracy of investors, which is deemed to be a back-door takeover. And now they have hired a PR guy (I love you Toby but good as you are at investor relations you are no MMX CEO). Its a disgrace that no journalist has dug into this....and that no lawyer or regulatory body has seen fit to expose these highly illegal maneuvers. And all that aside, they are highly unlikely to be able to sell the asset or grow it. This is activist investors in toy town playing at being in control, but with no knowledge of the market they seek to prosper in. It makes me ashamed to be British!
finethings: I confidently predict the MMX share price will rocket back up to 16.5 this afternoon!
Minds+Mach share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange
Your Recent History
Gulf Keyst..
FTSE 100
UK Sterlin..
Stocks you've viewed will appear in this box, letting you easily return to quotes you've seen previously.

Register now to create your own custom streaming stock watchlist.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P:40 V: D:20170325 19:49:38