We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jubilee Metals Group Plc | JLP | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 6.90 | 08:00:14 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.90 | 6.90 | 6.90 | 6.90 |
| Industry Sector |
|---|
| MINING |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 18/4/2024 08:29 by frogkid Trust. Exactly what I have been saying for months. If you make an announcement you better bloody well stick to it. This is the biggest failing of JLP. Only a small group of shareholders see the vision, myself included, but how can you expect to attract new investors when deadlines are constantly missed. Almost without fail. Meanwhile we will be eyed up by the majors who may already be taking positions under the radar. I still think we will get taken out on the cheap. Maybe the delays are part of it. |
Posted at 18/4/2024 08:22 by kennyp52 I’m not saying Jubilee will not eventually achieve its goals but if you keep missing targets you lose trust. When it comes the Sp is likely to jump substantially imho but the copper production / sales need to happen first ! It’s all going on .. that is undeniable .. but production Leon .. get that copper production flowing !Daft as it may seem this might give investors a top up opportunity 🙄 |
Posted at 16/4/2024 09:49 by sb The issue is Shev that statements are made expressing intentions which are then interpreted, for whatever reason, as deadlines by certain investors who then manufacture negativity around an imagined deadline being missed. We operate in a hugely complex environment and a politically charged one too and most investors can have no clue what is involved in achieving what has and is still to be done and how fluid time can be necessarily. It is only sentiment, and sentiment ALONE, that drives the share price, so constantly chipping away with little negative comments is self-defeating IF you are a genuine investor looking for capital gains. |
Posted at 28/2/2024 09:32 by xow98 Interim Results 2023 Investor Presentation Re-scheduledJubilee Metals Group PLC (AIM: JLP; Altx: JBL), a leader in diversified metals processing, with operations in Africa, announces that due to a technical system failure by the Investor Meet Company, the Company is forced to reschedule the Interim Results Investor Presentation. The Company apologises for any inconvenience caused and will advise on the rescheduled time and day of the presentation. The Interim Results Presentation is available on the website at the following link: |
Posted at 15/12/2023 14:08 by deme1 I hope some serious questions are put forward to the company.Questioning Leon's integrity should be first and foremost. How can you tell investors there is no need for a placing, then then a couple of days later a placing is not only announced but also fully subscribed. This was all planned well in advance and Leon has basically lied to investors. Criminal if you ask me. Also if only £10mil was required, what have they raised an additional 30% ontop. Shares for the boys don't worry about the other investors. Frog must be seething |
Posted at 24/11/2023 09:34 by the skipper I got back in with a small stake yesterday after a very long break,and have had a top up this morning, but way to go yet before I can build a position like I had when I sold in the 20s. To achieve that I will need some decent movement on some of my other stocks but this recent note from Turner Pope provides some reassurance that AIM might have a good year ahead of it:AIM – Is this the Bottom? - Index set for a Strong Rebound in Q1 2024 • London’s Alternative Investment Market (‘AIM’) now appears quite dramatically oversold, following a decline of more than 40% relative to the FTSE All Share over just the past 2 years. • Long-term chart provides exceptional support, producing multiple bounces from the index’s current level over the past 13-years. • Coincident crossover of stochastic indicators reinforces expectation of an imminent and significant reversal from a heavily oversold position. • AIM has displayed surprisingly high sensitivity to UK Base Rates – which is good news, given they now appear to have peaked with cuts anticipated by next summer. • Improved access to capital could revive AIM’s IPO market, while the recent spike in M&A activity suggests consolidators have already started picking off high quality, lowly valued/well positioned enterprises. This may accelerate further during 2024. • Impact of suggested abolition of Inheritance Tax (however unlikely) looks overblown. • Risk-takers might seize opportunity now in order to avoid anticipated rush back into the index early in the New Year. Based on past recoveries, an upward correction that returns the index to around the 900 level during the first half of 2024 appears to be a realistic target. (Risk warning: Financial forecasts and any statements made regarding future performance expectations are not reliable indicators of future results and should not be relied upon to make investment decisions) A Couple of charts tell it all – AIM looks set to rebound sharply As can be seen below, the 13-year FTSE AIM All Share chart (below) displays no less than 10 bounces from the current index level of around 700 (±2.5%), half of which went on to deliver a substantial gain over following months (average 41%) before reversing decisively once again. The Index appears set to repeat this pattern once again in the coming weeks. 13-year FTSE AIM All Share Index Plotting the same FTSE AIM All Share chart against the FTSE All Share (below) highlights surprising resilience of UK larger caps over the past two years, during which time UK Base Rates spiked from next to nothing to their current peak of 5.25%. As can be seen, the performance gap between the two indices (with AIM chalking up a relative decline of c.57% over the period) has never been wider in its history. Being a useful technical tool for identifying significantly oversold (<25%)/overbought (>75%) situations, AIM’s stochastics have also been plotted underneath in order to assess price momentum and predict trend reversal. As can be seen, a crossover of the fast stochastic (%K) line above the slow stochastic (%D) line in an oversold region (and vice-versa in an overbought region) has, on a number of past occasions anticipated an important turning point. Having already seen the two lines kiss back on 30 April, they now appear set to cross on the 20% level within the coming days. Investors have historically played down the influence of macroeconomics on the AIM index. Yet although the above chart demonstrated the surprising resilience of blue chips during the extended phase of base rate hikes that commenced in December 2021 as the Bank of England attempted to control rampant inflation, AIM’s contrasting collapse over the same period is quite stark. Perhaps we should not be too surprised, given that AIM comprises mostly cash hungry, young and innovative businesses that require regular access to new financing. The fact that interest rates now appear to have peaked (both here and in the US), along with a wide expectation that a series of consecutive cuts will kick off from early summer 2024 in an effort to ward off recession, however, suggests both value investors and consolidators will now be prepared to take advantage of the index’s exceptional decline. In terms of forward multiples, the index most certainly looks cheap. AIM 100’s 12-month price/earnings (‘P/E’) ratio, for example, has now fallen below its long-term average of just over 20 times, a level it last reached at the start of the Pandemic (December 2019), but well below the almost 28 times it achieved late summer 2022. The only other time it plunged to such depths over the past decade, was when the resource-heavy index was hit by a collapse in commodity prices early in 2015. At the smaller end of the market, where many early-stage businesses remain loss-making with weak balance sheets, forward multiples such as EV/sales have been hit even harder, in some cases more than halving from the levels seen less than 18 months ago. Corporate activity now also looks set to rebound The dire level of corporate activity seen during 2023 also looks set to rebound. To date, there have been just 11 new issues (IPOs) on the junior market this year, which is the lowest number for 24 years, down 27% on last year, and an exceptional 80% below on the same period in 2021. A total of just £50m was raised in the process, some 95% below the figure of two years ago. The extent of the bottleneck created over this period suggests that such activity levels are poised to rise significantly in coming months simply in response to a modest recovery in confidence, in tandem with a flurry of attractively priced, much deferred secondary offerings which, year to date have raised only around £1.1 billion (or about a quarter of what was achieved in 2021) despite an obvious and widespread need to bolster balance sheets. Takeover activity which, in the past has also provided something of an underpin for AIM valuations, was almost non-existent during the first nine months of the year, but interestingly has picked up quite significantly in the past six weeks with a number of generous takeovers proposals, including Recommended Cash Offers and hostile approaches being confirmed. These include Tribal Group (AIM: TRB, recommended on 5 October at a 70% premium to its previous closing), OnTheMarket (AIM: OTMP, 19 October at a 71% premium), FireAngel Safety Technology Group (AIM: FA., 26 October at a 252% premium) and Hotel Chocolat (AIM: HOTC, 16 November at a 170% premium). Low valuations along with an expectation that the cost of funding will reduce quite significantly in coming months suggests such predatory activity will remain an ongoing feature for AIM, with improved access to capital generally bolstering sentiment and trading liquidity for ‘risk-on’ |
Posted at 15/11/2023 09:14 by sb “I’m convinced that there is much inefficiency in the market. These Graham-and-DoddsvillSUPERIOR INVESTOR PRINCIPLE #1: The stock market is, in fact, very INEFFICIENT (…and these inefficiencies can, and should, be exploited by the superior investor) SUPERIOR INVESTOR PRINCIPLE #2: “Always buying the business, not buying the stock” SUPERIOR INVESTOR PRINCIPLE #3: Buying with a Margin of Safety Well worth reading at times like these.... |
Posted at 02/11/2023 10:24 by kennyp52 “Anyone looking at that from the outside won't touch it with a bargepole”Except a bid .. the technology / science they have developed alone is worth the MCAP . If the board can’t get the market support then they could find themselves being taken over cheaply the way the share price is going . But they can only put the information out there and investors run at the first sight of a drop .. natural. Companies are always at the whim of the market and are the PI’s. The problem could also be that investors are already “all in” so existing are reluctant to top up . That means finding / appealing to new investors . Leon’s stated objective / target is a billion $ MCAP .. or is £ … happy to give him the chance but frustrated with the share price performance which is not inconsistent with many other mining companies even thought they are progressing expansion. Metals prices are the real issue |
Posted at 25/7/2023 10:22 by sb It says that the the company is still under the radar of many sophisticated investors and that many of the the investors that know about it don't see the big picture because the company doesn't paint it and is too obscure and lacks transparency in its communications. I come from a sales background and there are two key factors in sales that always win: quality and trust. The market always appreciates and pays for product quality, and the company is getting this right, and indeed maintaining the quality of the product is as Leon has said with the copper, one of the reasosn why the ramp up has taken longer then expected. Trust is a bigger issue, and there is still a legacy of the old times lingering in that respect and, I feel, that Leon is too stretched to really pay enough attention to the detail of what is presented to investors/potential investors which always leaves questions hanging in the air. He needs to appoint a comms professional to revamp the image of the company and handle all corporate comms both outgoing and incoming to/from investors. We need more polish and proactivity. The good thing though is that from an innovation and production perspective we are world class; we just need to tell the world about it. |
Posted at 20/6/2023 10:25 by jourgen talewsitall An Inconvenient Truth About ESG Investingby Sanjai Bhagat As of December 2021, assets under management at global exchange-traded “sustainable&r How have investors fared? Not that well, it seems. To begin with, ESG funds certainly perform poorly in financial terms. In a recent Journal of Finance paper, University of Chicago researchers analyzed the Morningstar sustainability ratings of more than 20,000 mutual funds representing over $8 trillion of investor savings. Although the highest rated funds in terms of sustainability certainly attracted more capital than the lowest rated funds, none of the high sustainability funds outperformed any of the lowest rated funds. That result might be expected, and it is possible that investors would be happy to sacrifice financial returns in exchange for better ESG performance. Unfortunately ESG funds don’t seem to deliver better ESG performance either. Researchers at Columbia University and London School of Economics compared the ESG record of U.S. companies in 147 ESG fund portfolios and that of U.S. companies in 2,428 non-ESG portfolios. They found that the companies in the ESG portfolios had worse compliance record for both labor and environmental rules. They also found that companies added to ESG portfolios did not subsequently improve compliance with labor or environmental regulations. This is not an isolated finding. A recent European Corporate Governance Institute paper compared the ESG scores of companies invested in by 684 U.S. institutional investors that signed the United Nation’s Principles of Responsible Investment (PRI) and 6,481 institutional investors that did not sign the PRI during 2013–2017. They did not detect any improvement in the ESG scores of companies held by PRI signatory funds subsequent to their signing . Furthermore, the financial returns were lower and the risk higher for the PRI signatories. Why are ESG funds doing so badly? Part of the explanation may simply be that an express focus on ESG is redundant: in competitive labor markets and product markets, corporate managers trying to maximize long-term shareholder value should of their own accord pay attention to employee, customer, community, and environmental interests. On this basis, setting ESG targets may actually distort decision making. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
