We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Pay. | FPS | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.45 | 01:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.45 | 0.45 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 20/6/2009 10:55 by hena79 Hi HugePants, I got the below reply from Mr Tony FitzSimmons yesterday. Ogg Lay Ann is happy to take my shares of me at 0.20p but I'm going to hold out now for more than 1p which was the cash in the accounts at minimum. Keep my 487,000 shares tuck away. They are looking to do an acquisition and I believe if so will return to the market at well north of 2p.'You may not have noticed that the EGM in May approved the delay in the deadline for a suitable acquisition until 2012. The accounts and an update to investors are being worked on at the moment'. Tony |
Posted at 18/6/2009 21:02 by hena79 Anyone else who thinks around 1p per share should have been returned by now?Cc:tony@ruton.co.uk Cc:layann.ong@westsv I've sent an email to the above email addresses as per below:- 'I have gathered over the last few days that the website for investors is also now down'. 'I think the silence treatment and lack of communication to all investors has not been fair when a clear indication to return the balance shown in the accounts in the absence of an acquisition was due to happen in January 2009 as per the last set of accounts'. |
Posted at 21/7/2008 16:33 by tiredoldbroker HP, I've no reason to WANT to see FPS announce more write-offs; but 30 years as an investor and former stockbroker tells me to look on the cautious side and to ask what the risks are. I've listed them all above, but when you say there are no possible future liabilities or write-offs mentioned, you're ignoring p5 "contemplating issuing proceedings" and "the uncertainty inherent in Chinese litigation", assuming the China cash can be extracted at no cost, and ignoring the trade creditors shown in the b/sheet. You're also ignoring the gap between the stated Renminbi deposits at 31.12 and the best estimate of realisable cash now.Ther must be some reason why Mr Ong got chucked off the board when he did; this, and his subsequent coup against the other directors has never been satisfactorily explained. Even the company secretary quit, and while it doesn't prove anything, it all suggests that it is a (l)ong way from anyone claiming that this has been a successful investment. Maybe you're guessing/hoping that there is no more bad news to come out and that nothing further goes wrong. Maybe you'll even be proved right. But until then, it isn't a success, and you can't cash it in. |
Posted at 02/7/2008 12:11 by hugepants tiredoldbrokerSDOO was a success for the investors who bought at the low point before delisting. |
Posted at 02/7/2008 10:51 by tiredoldbroker And there, in a nutshell, you have the problem with Cancer6's approach to investing: he/she/it will pretend none of their previous posts, saying the results would be out, the quote restored, and the share price rocket, ever took place; ignore the inconvenient truth; ignore the collapse in a share price caused by the announcement of delisting; ignore the management who've lead the delisting then profiting at the expense of private investors; and call it a good post, or a success. |
Posted at 02/7/2008 10:03 by tiredoldbroker But HugePants, in what way was that a success for the average private investor ? In the days before cancelling the AIM quote, they drove the price down from over 8p to 1.5p, and after the land sale they had 8p per share in cash - and you're calling a 5p buy-out a success ?Likewise, the probability is that FPS holders will get shafted, and the point is, Cancer6 the cancerstick has ramped dud stock after dud stock, and tells a pack of lies every time in an attempt to snag a few hundred quid profit before the roof caves in. |
Posted at 20/6/2008 09:07 by seanmiller Total novice. She is banging on about cash values etc etc, but ther great thing in this sorry story is that this will unfold and we will get a solid decision about what chancer is saying. The RNS does not look good at all, and shows that this company is really in trouble. The investors will be lucky to see anything in this one. All this talk of 1.5p blah blah blha is cuckoo land stuff. But hey, why argue about it, news will follow soon (saying that this company takes it's time in a big way!!) No NOMAD wants to touch it, and if it does the fees alone are huge. Add to that no forward business plan and you have a share price that if, and only if, they bother lifting suspension will plummet to fractions of a penny. I'm just glad these are suspended, stops chancer being able to mug other noivces into her naff share picks. Notice she don't hold any other shares at the moment!! all her savings locked up in FPS and about to get burnt lol. She deserves every bit of this............ |
Posted at 19/5/2008 15:58 by tiredoldbroker Quite unbelievable - we have "Lord" Santafe, whose track record is so crushingly bad over a number of years that on his own thread he's be parading the fact that he's gone bankrupt (and is now probably in breach of the law by using his poor old Mum to buy shares on his behalf and on his advice), allied to serial loser Chancre6, the one-man-stroke-woman curse of the investing community, the "Jonah the Nautical Nightmare" (of Beano fame, © Ken Reid, 1958) of all penny stock investors, both telling the world that the suspension of the shares because the NOMAD has quit is somehow a good thing.Come on Chancre6, scratch that itchy scab and confess to the world that your track record (LNX, MGP, PARO) is almost unique and quite outstanding - cripplingly bad and lossmaking, but so extreme that you have to look on in horrified disbelief. |
Posted at 13/5/2008 11:35 by seanmiller WINS not bidding aggressively for stock, if they were being aggressive they would lift the bid - even the most basic novice knows that!!!If they were being aggressive they would see no stock coming in on current bid, so they would up it to entice investors. So another lie there then. There is no aggressive bidding going on here, by WINS or anyone, it's anothe rlie by chnancer6 to ramp the stock to encourage buyers in so she can exit at 0.70p, which is her break even. This stock tanked soon after she tipped it. |
Posted at 13/5/2008 09:08 by seanmiller Oh dear, mm's up to old tricks again. Upping the bid to make the shares more attractive to the un-suspecting punter lol. This share is such little volume (The 4.5m totalled £16,875!!! lol) that the mm's are probably just seeing who they can get to buy for fun!!Bid up to make the spead shorter and encourage buying from novices. Sellers may take the chance to get out (the non-novice investors anyway!) |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
