26/11/2015 15:56:45 Cookie Policy Free Membership Login

Blinkx Share Chat - BLNX

Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Blinkx LSE:BLNX London Ordinary Share GB00B1WBW239 ORD 1P
  Price Change Price Change % Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  +2.50 +11.90% 23.50 23.00 23.25 23.50 20.00 20.00 1,217,492 15:34:57
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Software & Computer Services 144.9 -16.7 -3.5 - 94.76

Blinkx Share Discussion Threads

Showing 241426 to 241449 of 241450 messages
Post New Message
Chat Pages: 9658  9657  9656  9655  9654  9653  9652  9651  9650  9649  9648  9647  >>
looks like a blue day! the buffoons dont like it up 'em! apart from hotpants lolgeheimnis2
i wouldn't be surprised to see a large lump of rg's stock go through after the close in the unknown column. it could put jarvis into an after hrs trade frenzy!rocket fuel
It's pathetic childish goading posts like that, which is why people respond...If you can't take it don't dish it...Try engaging your brain before posting...sikhthetech
Seismic waves being sent throughout the share world with aborigines feeling in Australia and inuit Indians wondering what's shaking all the snow off the trees in Canada as blinkx share price soars back to where it was yesterday Or We are up 2.5p which is good news for holders and it's nothing to go filling up a message board with all day unlike leluot3 and friends did yesterday on a 1.75p drop glafootball
1gw, they get in they get out, long term short term, >28% and <28%,they make gains and take losses and it seems they have a cult following every time they decide to pass thru any small/med cap mug punter AIM stock when they are busy buying, but fade into oblivion when they do one of their many sharp exit stage left routines.rocket fuel
Rocketfuel - please expand on your rene (ReNeuron Group) analogy. As far as I can see Toscafund got to a maximum holding of about 14% (108m shares) in April 2012. They then made some disposals to fall to 11% (84m shares) in September 2012. The big change was that they were diluted down to around 5% because of placings in 2013. They then held for a while further but sold out in May 2015. So completely different from the blinkx (or Redrow, Daisy, Pheonix, Findel) example in that they never seem to have got close to 30%. When they did sell out it seems to have been from a position of only about 5%.1gw
Its a funny old world, one minute the share price is down 10% then it's up 10% I suppose this is just the vagaries of the stock market.................sk02457
1gw, good post..Tosca do sometimes sit on their holdings and other times exit fairly quickly, QPP being an example when they bought and sold within weeks...No one knows for sure what they will do with Blnx..they may just sit at these levels hoping someone else bids...they may exit at a loss or wait for a profit...sikhthetech
i must say one has to laugh at this obsession with 'toscafund meets blnx' its like the underwater holders grasp at every straw when in fact their holdings in blnx is less than 1% pounds sterling value of their total managed funds (over £2.5bn) and a pebble in their shoe right now i would think. they dont need blnx, blnx need them. they could write off any loss in blnx at a stroke in relation to their entire managed funds.rocket fuel
STT - your commentary on the news flow and the deteriorating numbers is correct ... the market caught up with that and the share price is now more realistic and aligned to the numbers. My point is that the activities of the so-called family have had no impact ... like King Canute, they could not stop the tide from coming in ... the comedy is that they think they could!alex1621
My reading is Toscafund build towards 30% to give themselves optionality. If they can find the right inorganic move they promote it, otherwise they may exit. However, they may sit in the high 20's for some time. They sometimes partner with other big shareholders. Redrow - they got to 27% in July 2008 but waited until 2012 and their interest had fallen to 17% before they tried to buy it with the then chairman/biggest shareholder (who had 40%). Daisy - they got to 27% in May 2013 and had 28.5% in August 2013 when news of a possible bid (in a consortium with the Daisy boss who had 23% and Penta Capital) emerged. Pheonix IT - they got to 28% in July 2014 but it was May 2015 before news of talks on a possible bid emerged (Toscafund together with Daisy Group) Findel - they got to 29.7% in November 2012, fell to 25.9% in August 2013, back up to 29.2% in June 2015 and more recently down to 20% - possibly to let Sports Direct in and possibly because they think this may ultimately lead to a bid from Sports Direct. So yes they seem to like to acquire a stake in the high 20's and yes they sometimes sit on that stake for quite a period, but sometimes a bid follows. Errors excepted. Please do your own research.1gw
1gw, really...Then why were the smooth talking gang using the same tactics against a thread or posters when those posters were positive...Read the newsflow over the last couple of years...has it been great and consistently positive or have there been lots of 'jam' tomorrow posts...Deflecting away from newsflow won't change the way the business is operating...sikhthetech
tosca would only need 5m to pass the 30% threshold and they could have picked that up from the rg reduction if they wanted. guess why they didn't? because they dont want to make a bid for blnx! go do a bit of research on toscafund and especially the pegasus division. they have a policy of acquiring a 28% stake in small/mid cap companies and holding on for 12 to 24 months before offloading the lot, usually in one fail swoop of a sell like they did at rene for a loss. they then jumped stright into the the Bismarck Blnx the very next trading day. lolrocket fuel
STT - they want the share price to go up and hope that the business returns to growth and profitability. That part, I've no problem with. Why would they not?What I find amusing about them (and sorry to say this, you) is their belief that anything on this bulletin board matters ... it makes no sense to ridicule someone that doesn't believe in Blinkx, or try to swamp their posts. Blinkx future will not be determined by anything written here. If you can get a decent debate going it is interesting, but other than that it's just comedy!alex1621
Possibly any who "deflect" could be long blinkx and hoping not to lose any more money, STT? I have to say I find "smooth talking" a rather inaccurate description of some if not most of the bullish posts on here.1gw
why do you think the smooth talking gang try and deflect from anything which might show where blnx are going wrong...sikhthetech
Industry started moving towards mobile 4-5yrs ago, blnx buy RhythmMedia 2 yrs ago... a little late... Move towards Ad Exchanges/Programmatic started around 2 years ago... Companies have already setup shop and are promoting themselves for the Presidential Elections.... where's 1R? There's an industry move towards OOH and back to legacy TV... where's 1R? Blnx are not innovators/visionaries but always seem to be chasing the pack...sikhthetech
I've put a longer post on LSE but I think you've got a trade-off in buying blinkx because of Toscafund's stakebuilding: Upside - they might launch a bid or get a third party to bid; Downside - share price weakness from continued selling when Toscafund can't buy without triggering a bid. Recently it appears the downside fear has been winning out.1gw
alex, The newflow changed... RG 1st bought last year... Sept 2014 was the 1st rns... last year the bod were talking about bouncing back from the profit warning, the 'inflection' point, how mobile was doing well etc... promises of 'fig' jam tomorrow... someone posted that RG didn't seem happy at the AGM... in Oct TU the bod's outlook mentioned profits within 6-12 months... Yet a month later, the timescale disappeared - it's not in the H1 results... Maybe RG felt that the bod were clueless as to where 1R was heading.... Maybe he didn't get the clarity he wanted.... Now there's a thought...sikhthetech
Me too Lance, would have expected some movement upwards.alex1621
Trends towards Private Exchanges... https://www.exchangewire.com/blog/2015/11/25/programmatic-video-twos-company-threes-a-crowd/sikhthetech
Stocky. The board of directors have no say about who buys shares in the market. I'm surprised there isnt more speculation about a takeover with Tosca sitting at 29%lance corporal winstanley ash
Lance/Alex, none of us know their true intention. However, it does seem strange that they have been allowed to build such a large stake with no resistance. Board incompetence/collusion, corner or bid?stocky
Lance - if you want to be cynical you might expect them to sit on their holding and wait for the time period when they can make a low bid. They sit on paper losses but are in a strong position. If a third party bids they can block it or lever up the bid in their favour; or they can wait a few months and bid at a small premium to the current share price. If the business turns-around in the short term they will benefit from a rising share price. Fascinating! In other words, I have no idea! That qualifies me for "family" membership! Not sure about RG ... did he just reconsider the investment case in the light of losses, cash burn and write-offs? What changed?alex1621
Chat Pages: 9658  9657  9656  9655  9654  9653  9652  9651  9650  9649  9648  9647  >>

Your Recent History
Gulf Keyst..
FTSE 100
UK Sterlin..
Stocks you've viewed will appear in this box, letting you easily return to quotes you've seen previously.

Register now to create your own custom streaming stock watchlist.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

1 site:2 151126 15:56