Bioseek Share Discussion Threads

[and then] 20/4/2012 07:30

moving on...

[buywell2] 19/4/2012 16:52

Waiting for the axe to fall ??

Asterand PLC
Daily Commentary


Our system posted a WAIT today. The previous SELL recommendation was made on 09.03.2012 (40) days ago, when the stock price was 5.6250. Since then ATD has fallen -17.78% .



Our WAIT tag says all that is to say. Stay at cash or check the other stocks while waiting the next signal. Do not bother with buying or short selling this stock as long as the WAIT tag stays.

[spaceparallax] 19/4/2012 12:17

I'm interested to see where things stand and am happy to take an objective view.

[buywell2] 19/4/2012 11:19

Are you expecting good news ?

19 April 2012
ASTERAND PLC
('Asterand' or 'the Company')
Notification of Final Results
Date: Monday 30 April 2012

Asterand plc ("Asterand" or the "Group" - LSE: ATD), a leading supplier of human tissue based solutions to pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies engaged in drug discovery research will announce its Final Results for the year ended 31 December 2011, on Monday 30 April 2012.
- Ends -

[tpaulbeaumont] 18/4/2012 08:37

tpaulbeaumont - 13 Jan 2012 - 15:19:15 - 853 of 1307
dunno if you meant me b4 AT but i mentioned yday i thought your wave labels on that graph were highly unlikely, just an opinion, as someone whos used them for many years.

im made differently you see, cos when i was first using waves i asked the ppl who had experience for help, i would of asked why if someone suggested my analysis was wrong, instead of letting my ego get in the way and dismissing it saying things like you dont know what youre talking about/100% guaranteed/nailed on etc, but it makes no difference to me.

[nesty1760] 17/4/2012 20:02

We await the finals then!

[medingdong] 17/4/2012 16:26

What's with all the edits, fraid I'd go to the cops with all the threats of violence was it ?

I'll meet up anywhere in the world, as I told you before, seems to be a bit of an overreaction to a perfectly legitimate (and potentially profitable for you) suggestion that C down or 5 down, can't equate to a 1 or an a up. If anyone looking saw the threats of violence before the hindsight corrections - over an incorrectly annotated flippin Elliott chart of all things - be very easy draw their own conclusions. Another mouthpiece who is so eager to validate the ego in the ether, only conclusion to draw is that the equity curve from trading isn't sufficient in the real world to satisfy.

For someone who knows sod all by your assertion and his own admission when it comes to Elliott at least - that's pretty grim reflection on you Mr. market is trapped and going to do what I tell it to.

Let me know where you want to try take a piece of me, I'm free any time.

Regards.

Beaumont, I assume you're over 18 to have a credit card to turn blue, no law against acting like someone still in junior infants though I suppose :0)

[tpaulbeaumont] 17/4/2012 16:21

I was gonna say if you use the search function you can read ppl that are filtered without having to go through filtering and unflitering etc AT, so considering weve been discussing the intricacies of waving i thought id see what MDD had to say and you know what, hes come out with his most astute comment yet:

Medingdong - 17 Apr 2012 - 15:51:14 - 1302 of 1304
I'm not even any good with Elliott!


hes talking sense there :) been some great calls last few days btw, still waiting for the 5 wave correction though... thank me later ;)

[tpaulbeaumont] 17/4/2012 15:34

None of those examples are relevant to what we're discussing AT.

What youve circled are subdivisions within a 3 WAVE CORRECTION. The small c wave sudvisions are not a correction, merely the last part of a 3 WAVE CORRECTION.

I await an example of a 5 WAVE CORRECTION with bated breath.

[and then] 17/4/2012 15:18

Seems strange to me

[tpaulbeaumont] 17/4/2012 15:04

this was the only reason i mentioned it. no such correction as far as i know, looking forward to being proved wrong ;)

[tpaulbeaumont] 17/4/2012 15:00

please AT, can you provide a single example from any of their literature/sites etc, as although ive been (correctly) using ew for many years, one of us appears to have the wrong end of the stick, and id love to be surprised :)

by all means use their book, heres all relevant info from EW principle;

[tpaulbeaumont] 17/4/2012 14:39

Well i go by ralph elliotts rules, same ones as frost and pretchers EW principle, which dont have any 5 wave corrections, but if you have found a new one you like fair play.

[and then] 17/4/2012 14:22

Funny really, cos i thought it would be so more sensible to be asking how the targets are generated etc, but obviously everyone is making enough money already!

[tpaulbeaumont] 17/4/2012 14:13

you cant simply have a 5 wave move on its own AT

[and then] 17/4/2012 13:26

Interestingly had already triggered long before the employment figures, once again proving that its all preplanned...

[and then] 17/4/2012 11:17

update;

.