We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neos Resources | NEOS | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.415 | 01:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.415 | 0.415 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 10/5/2017 23:27 by g1g4lo Sent to Mr Tainton and will respond if I hear anything. I suspect not as he has not responded to my 2 recent emails.Dear Mr Tainton I can only assume why you have not responded to my emails as this document seems to confirm everything. I last spoke to you in March 2016 but it looks like you planned to leave NEOS investors with nothing. I suspect it was Bryan Myerson that caused the problems but I would appreciate an explanation. You passed the PSC from NEOS on 28th March to SCB & Associates Limited prior to your resignation on 31st March. This is where all the tax losses are. As you know, I had a reasonable holding of over 2.5% in NEOS and suspect I own nothing now. It looks like you gave the tax losses away to SCB & Associates and this was planned last year on 6th April 2016, just after I spoke to you last year. This in my view was done to prevent Principle gaining anything but unfortunately I lose everything also. Can you at least confirm that all NEOS shareholders have lost everything as per the confirmation statement issued today. An email will be fine but by all means, call me on +44 xxxx xxxxxx. I feel after our multiple discussions, I at least deserve an explanation after I was trying to find other investors to invest further for a reverse takeover. Regards Xxxxxxx |
Posted at 25/2/2016 17:27 by g1g4lo AS119 - I have not spoken to Mr Tainton recently but has been working on it for well over a year.Clearly, I assume Stephanie has also done her own research. I understand from another investor that hopefully some news may come out in Q2 but I cannot confirm that. May well have a chat with the BOD at the end of March to see how things are going. |
Posted at 27/2/2015 11:47 by g1g4lo If you look at my posts 6337and 6339.I have spoken to Mr Traynor and there is no link and will be no link between NEOS and Ausinox. If people do their own research, they would find out themselves. He is the lawyer and the registered address is common as some one has to be a director or secretary to sort the legalities out. These will change in due course. NEOS has to stay in the bio-fuels industry and will not be in mining to utilise the tax losses. I have also spoken to Mr Tainton and Australia is not on the agenda for NEOS. Firstly, the finances have to be sorted out as Nicholas Myerson resigned and they found he had wasted money trying to get a few RTOs sorted and now NEOS has to sort the finances out first which will go into probably Q3. Only then can they look for a reverse takeover suitor. The suitor is likely to be from Africa I have tried to inform this board from my discussions with Mr Traynor and Mr Tainton and gave a brief overview of our discussion and straight from the horses mouth. In the future, I feel it best for me to keep my research and discussions to myself as clearly my posts are ignored. Keep on with your ifs buts and wherefores. Adios from a large investor |
Posted at 24/2/2015 19:51 by jojo_jo AUSINOX, Australia are beginning to make waves.Perhaps a dual AU/UK listing of some sort is the plan? Pure guesswork of course. Dragon sells Weld Range shares to new investor Published 05 Jan 15 By: Esmarie Swanepoel PERTH (miningweekly.com) – ASX-listed Dragon Mining has restructured the share sale agreement of its 39.95% interest in Weld Range Metals, which owns the Weld Range project, in Western Australia. In July last year, Dragon agreed to a share buy-back agreement with Weld Range Metals, with Weld Range expected to buy back more than 48.22-million of its shares, for a A$1-million consideration. However, Dragon said on Monday that the company had instead executed a share sale agreement with Ausinox, at the request of Weld Range Metals. Ausinox would buy about 10.3-million Weld Range shares from Dragon Mining, while the A$3.78-million debt Weld Range owed to Dragon Mining would also be assigned to Ausinox. Consideration payable to Dragon Mining is A$1-million. “At Weld Range’s request, this is a change in structure to what was originally proposed, but the outcome for Dragon Mining remains the same,” said Dragon executive director Brett Smith. There were no conditions precedent to the new agreement, and the transaction would likely be completed by the end of January. -------------------- Not sure about the Atomaer connection though ... Atomaer Australia Pty Limited L 10 256 Adelaide Tce Perth WA 6000 Phone: (08) 9218 8833 Category: Oil and Gas Exploration and Development IMPO DYOR NAI Jo |
Posted at 01/12/2014 00:58 by g1g4lo I have given up on Neos since July and this is the first time I have had a look on this board since then.And so pleased a few posters have done all the research and much appreciated. Yes it looks like things are happening and just hope existing investors do not get done over. Off on hols for a fortnight but may get an update by the end of December as the next set of accounts are due. News could reverse the feeling felt by many last December. GL to all investors here |
Posted at 31/10/2014 11:30 by mrbee83 Today I got a share certificate from HSBC sent recorded delivery with my share amount & investor code etc etc... and at the bottom it reads "This document is valuable and should be kept in a safe place" -So is it still valuable? Can I still exchange shares for cash? |
Posted at 01/7/2014 12:39 by jojo_jo 1st July today, and still no announcement - so if the 6 month rule did perhaps work on a calendar month basis we're still over it. They must be doing something important behind the scenes and got an extension from the LSE to finalise it, whatever it is. The most likely things are a financed business plan, a new cornerstone investor or a full RTO. IMPO/DYOR/NAI Jo |
Posted at 30/4/2014 13:33 by jojo_jo Not looking great admittedly, but better than I expected, all things considered. The main assets after all are the LSE Listing itself (in the sought after fuel sector) and b/forward tax losses, which should be available until the Indian division is fully wound down over the next 12 months. I would say the directors have lowered expectations as far as they can now, so anything they say will be deemed a positive. This is pretty normal strategy when you want to take control for little or nothing. I reckon in these circumstances they could get away with returning to market with a free float below the usual 25% minimum, perhaps around the 15% - 20% mark. That way the major investors (Myerson & Co) would retain over 80% of any 'new' company company thus created. It would be silly to give up the two major assets... the listing and the tax losses. The listing alone is worth c.£500k. I don't see them doing it and think all this is about lowering co-investor expectations ahead of the dilution that will come with a cash injection. However, any such dilution (perhaps 50%+) will be more than compensated for by the survival of the company in its new, viable form. It's all academic, as smaller investors have no say in it. Accordingly all comments here (bullish/bearish) are pure speculation. I remain hopeful that common sense will prevail. IMPO/DYOR/NAI Jo |
Posted at 21/2/2014 10:25 by stockonomist LOLI can see investors queueing up to invest in a Company where the two largest shareholders don't seem ready to fund the Company and it isn't a Going Concern. PMSL Even the numpty trading chimps on Topinfos thread wouldn't fall for that b.s. |
Posted at 19/1/2014 19:35 by tomboyb I think investors need to get onto the management ( if they can contact them) see what the issues are if they go beyond 31st Jan. Secondly - If they delay speak to the house broker - The problem is the house broker can well be supportive of their actions regardless of shareholders.If they go beyond - then it is possible that this management have something to hide - speak to house broker in that case and see what they are doing - Aim regulations seem to be easily flouted. As investors you need to hope that this is not a crude bunch - |
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
