ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

MTV Motive Tv

0.00225
0.00 (0.00%)
03 May 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Motive Television Investors - MTV

Motive Television Investors - MTV

Share Name Share Symbol Market Stock Type
Motive Tv MTV London Ordinary Share
  Price Change Price Change % Share Price Last Trade
0.00 0.00% 0.00225 01:00:00
Open Price Low Price High Price Close Price Previous Close
0.00225 0.00225
more quote information »

Top Investor Posts

Top Posts
Posted at 11/11/2016 20:23 by thegrumpster
For interest, seeing that the LSE board is still going.

From Statement of administrators proposals......Link posted on Lse, today 17.31 by PJ159



P 19

Acorn consulting was/is Len's Company. It is apparently claiming that it is owed £320,389 48.
At one stage half his salary was paid to it (Mentioned in Annual Reports from 2010-ish onwards.....Tax reasons?...here or in the US?)


P12

"Report on the conduct of Directors

We have a statutory duty to investegate the conduct of the Directors and any person we consider to be or have been a shadow or defacto director during the period of threee years before the date of our appointment, in relation to their management of the affairs of the Company and the causes of its failure.

We are obliged to submit confidential reports to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills......." ("We" ....being the Administrators)

So any well written complaints from investors about Director's conduct should probably also be forwarded to that Department, as well as to the Administrators.....for their report.

May as well prime them in advance......make sure there is plenty to go on, in the MTV file

They should have a good picture of the goings on of all the AIM companies that have been driven to the wall over the past few years, by persons supposedly looking after shareholder's interests, and they shouldn't be able to fob investors off by saying that it is nothing to do with them.


FWIW.

....Which is probably not a lot.
Posted at 04/8/2016 12:11 by smelgys dad
Here we have a current "Micro-Cap" tech stock, that has fingers in so many pies, the vast majority of them successful.

The newsflow here over the past 12 months has all been very positive, and there are over 4bn shares to be issued.

Not only that, the charts point to a rapid 80-bag rise from here, fundamentals in the form of rising production also underpin the vastly undervalued share price.

More brokers are now noticing MTV and rating them a BUY.

Lots of private investors here are also buying these on a monthly basis, and the amount of stock available to the general public is, piece by piece, slowly falling.

Added together, and with more good news to come regarding production and the possibility of more shares, MTV retains my 2.5p price target by 25th December.

Just saying like.
Posted at 10/5/2016 07:36 by pwhite73
smcl

I agree MTV were not and are not the only company that engaged in that sort of behaviour. Although it was arguably one of the worse on record.

What is important here is not the actions of the company but the actions of private investors. In both companies private investors were given ample warning by other private investors who had been victims of the same con. Furthermore the con was taking place before their very eyes yet they steadfastly refused to accept it until all their money was gone.

It is right and proper that these private investors are laughed at and ridiculed when they lose their money in con outfits like MTV and ERX.

Show them no mercy and no sympathy at all. It is one way they learn along with the loss of their cash.
Posted at 09/5/2016 17:53 by smcl
Pwhite73- with respect forget the rubbish that you or me or anyone on this or any other BB possess any fraction of a monopoly of wisdom whenbit comes to AIM investment. The comments you make could apply to tens or hundreds of shares on AIM.

We have all taken gambles risks to make a few quid for our futures. So what? Have any investors in MTV committed a crime. Maybe we were a bit naive. Perhaps. But not crooked.

Delighting in other peoples mistakes is not an admirable trait.
Posted at 09/5/2016 17:23 by thegrumpster
Pilsworth's new venture he slid over to, in the run up to the World Cup.




"CHRYSALIS was founded in 2014 when four leading media entrepreneurs came together to create a new and independent television production company – building on the success and heritage of the previous music and TV brand.

Mick Pilsworth has developed, produced or distributed some of the most famous brands in the TV business."

----------------------------------------

Don't know at what point Chrysalis decided to try it, but it looks like crowdfunding could be the way to go for MTV?
Perhaps if Len and Mick can prise the "best" bits from the administrators?

Crowdfunding could be the "new way forward" for a few AIM companies that have squeezed traditional small investors dry, and where even sophistticated investors seem not to want to play ball.

-----------------------------------------



"£329,010 raised

Target £200,000 Equity on offer 37.43% ?

Additional equity is issued when a pitch is overfunding.

Days left 0 Investors so far 196
Last investment 4 months ago
Largest £100,000

Join to view full details Login to find out more"

----------------------------------------



"Chrysalis Vision embraces crowdfunding

20 November, 2015 | By Hannah Gannagé-Stewart

Drama indie Chrysalis Vision has turned to crowdfunding site Crowdcube to raise up to £350,000 as the final stage in its investment push."

Final stage.....a year and a half later.




Wonder if Hannah Gannagé-Stewart is aware of his efforts with MTV?
Posted at 08/3/2016 21:24 by thegrumpster
Seems odd that the rabid rampers/company stooges are still going hell for leather on LSE.

Perhaps Len and Co are hopeful of some kind of "continuation" after they've slammed the door on MTV's current investors?

Be nice for them to resurrect such an outstanding gravy train, for a few more years. Maybe that is what they are trying to sort out now.

After all they now have hoovering out investors pockets down to a fine art, and it would be such a shame to waste those hard won skills, or such shallow thinking, blinkered, foaming at the mouth posters....or stooges that are so committed to their cause.

What a waste.
Posted at 19/11/2015 20:03 by thegrumpster
Re: The lunacy of over-reliance on charting, particularly with AIM shares:

Lse Post 09:09

Extract:

"It is not saying buy just showing that investors were apparently very bullish in that week. Click on the 5 year chart. You will see there was a nice 300 odd % spike from 1p to 3p way back at the end of November and beginning of December 2011. Look what happened at the end of January beginning of February 2012. The share turned bearish and plunged down to the depths of sub 1p and flat lined as a dead dodo for nearly 4 years until August 2015"

Motive has NEVER been anywhere near 3p, whatever any chart says. Certainly not in its current incarnation since October 2010. And far from plunging there has been a slow but steady destruction of shareholder value by our dear leaders.



25 October 2011

Placing to raise £1 million and trading update

"Motive Television PLC, the digital television technology, software and services provider, announces that it has conditionally raised £1,020,000 (the "Placing") through the issue of 728,571,429 new ordinary shares in the capital of the Company at a placing price of 0.14 pence per share (the "Placing Shares").

The Placing Shares have been placed with investors on behalf of the Company by XCAP Securities. The Placing is conditional upon admission of the Placing Shares to trading on AIM ("Admission"). The net proceeds of the Placing, amounting to approximately £950,000, will be used for working capital and growth purposes."




An excuse from another poster 09:25

"To be fair to Lefkosia, I pointed MTV out to him as a possible share to buy s/t and he would not have known about the consolidations (without going though 20+ RNSs) but agree just looking at any LSE chart may not give the full picture especially with AIM since so many shares have regular placings and occasional consolidations."


You do not need to look at 20+ RNS.

The spike was on 27th August, any normal investor would spend 20 seconds seeing if there was an RNS in the day in question, or any other news to justify the increase. (In this case there is an RNS clearly stating a capital restructuring is taking place).

They could then waste minute or two having a quick look at what is being said on the relevant bulletin board, to help judge whether the rise is justified, and of interest, or not.

It is as easy and as quick as that, and it is almost unbelievable that any investor, successful or otherwise would not do that, particularly with an AIM share which is mainly news and sentiment driven.

Charts may have their place with AIM shares, but not at the expense of basic common sense.



(Something we all clearly lack, otherwise we would not be here).


Print a shed load more shares very soon? Before the MCap goes completely down the pan?

I'm not sticking my arm down to retrieve it.
Posted at 13/11/2015 07:40 by pwhite73
tookers

"Why do ex-investors continue to flock here to spout non-sense in the belief they are 'saving' new investors?"

Because not everybody crosses the road when they see a group of youths mugging an elderly couple.

Children In Need starts today. Why do so many contribute when they have no children.

Sorry this world is not all about "its nothing to do with me therefore I'll keep myself to myself". This company has been deliberately destroying shareholder value for 10 years.

It is right and proper that it is taken to task whether or not you are an investor, an ex-investor or never having invested at all.
Posted at 13/11/2015 06:50 by tookers
Induna. Why do ex-investors continue to flock here to spout non-sense in the belief they are 'saving' new investors? Alterior motives i believe.
You categorise investors as all being stupid, thats based on your opinion of the company, so don't place everyone in the same box as you. Investors here saw reasoning through their research.
Most investors still here will call it quits when their aspirations for the company are not met, and you will likely not hear from them again because they are a lot more savvy than you and the boiler room crew.
Posted at 09/9/2015 19:28 by thegrumpster
"I beg to differ tookers."

Not to mention the article/ blog that was supposed to be an interview with Len stating that TabletTV would be in HD for the World Cup. HD was something that supposedly set it ahead of any other offering.
The BOD read the boards but it was six months before they got Craib to correct that convenient piece of misinformation, with his HD or not HD waffle on the blog page. By that time we all knew it was well past the World Cup, and that it was just something else put into the system to string investors along.

Before that, if you read the ii+i archives they used to feed something in every time they wanted a spike. One example in 2013, was a short video that appeared and disappeared as if it was something released by accident. Think there were extracts from Nickelodeon and popular series owned by the same group Warner/Viacom. Always within a couple of days there would be a placing.

Freeview?...they knew there was no Freeview standard for tablets for them to meet all along.....just string investors along.....normal procedure.

The photographs from outside the Apple store in New York......pure coincidence? Or devious scumbags trying to lead investors up the garden path.....again?

They are experts in keeping investors on the edge of their seats. It is all well practiced over years, and quite deliberate.

They might not actually be crooks and con artists as has been suggested by some on here, but IMO they are seriously, seriously sneaky, even by the world beating standards of dodginess of the "self regulated" AIM circus.

Doubt if there is anywhere else they could pull this off. Even as an OTC share in the US.

Why is it that Fertive with all his apparent top tier contacts in the media world, can't even get one of them to invest in MTV? Even a tiny, tiny amount?

Perhaps they know there isn't a barge pole long enough, to deal with MTV.
And have done all along.

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock