We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lon.Forfaiting | LFC | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | - |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 28/5/2019 08:00 by joe say hasin - Ye gods - you clearly don't know we are property investorsOr as you like to call us - rent boys |
Posted at 17/8/2012 05:24 by vig009 Dear Fellow InvestorsI've created a league in Fantasy Premier League called 2012-2013 Share Traders. Joining the league couldn't be easier. Simply use this link and you'll be added automatically after you've entered the game: You shouldn't need the league code, but just in case here it is: 1546655-344987. Enjoy the game! VIG009 |
Posted at 01/2/2011 08:47 by jailbird ok this my feelings on thisfirstly Torres - do not blame him wanting to leave...Pool cannot offer a chance of Champions Leagye until at last season sep 2012. We did not get a super rich investor, but a shrewd one, i am sure. The problem is his head had already gone last year, and he stayed until the club got new owners. He came to 'pool expecting to at least to be fighting for trophies on all fronts, but gillet and Hicks saw that the club would not be able to compete...Rafa lost it last season. But it upsets me, as the club pays his wages and for the fans, he gave it is all upto this point. When on form and focussed, he is the best, and i am sure, pool could have been nearer 4th spot now, if he had been on fire. However that means pool, would have also be fighting for 4th spot with chelsea... but instead he played like a sulky lost boy, and lost respect. if chelsea do not win champions league, and miss 4ht spot, then it would be a terrible mistake for torres. But i can see him getting alot of goals, as he will get the service. This is what he did not get at liverpool. Liverpool themselves are re-building..and there is plenty of potential to come from the forwards, if they work well. However they are still missing a couple of good players to be up there again. I am sure we will see more signings in the summer. However Chelsea could be a force again. |
Posted at 24/10/2010 21:19 by jon827 Because of the new owner, he's a legendary investor that follows trends (something close to my hart), im just following the smart money... :-) |
Posted at 13/10/2010 11:49 by abix74 It's not yet certain NESV will be the new owners but obviously most likely.You seem to miss the point that NESV is made up of 17 wealthy investors. That's £17.5 million each. Small change. |
Posted at 11/10/2010 17:50 by abix74 Son of fishmonger became successful stockbroker for wealthy Indonesian clients; nicknamed King of the Remisiers (Singapore term for stockbroker). Stopped managing other people's money in 1996 to become full-time investor. Held on to stock of winning palm oil producer Wilmar; his initial $10 million investment now worth $700 million. Also second-largest investor in distributor FJ Benjamin. |
Posted at 09/10/2010 07:27 by 5benny Chelsea - Chairman Buck defends foreign ownershipBeing held for the third successive years in the corridors of powers at Stamford Bridge, the Leaders in Football conference in West London this week has provided some interesting talking points. The conference heralds the coming-together of the good and the great of the footballing world to talk about the latest issues affecting the game. This week, rather aptly seeing as what has been going on in Merseyside, talk turned to foreign ownership, and the floor was taken by our very own Bruce Buck, the Chelsea chairman. Buck has worked under Roman Abramovich as a member of the Chelsea board for over five years, since the Russian's takeover in 2003, so is positioned better than most to give the positive side of foreign investors into the Premier League. 'I don't think foreign owners per se are bad,' he started. 'Of course I would say that, but it depends on what the objective of the foreign owner is in buying a club. If it is to make a quick few dollars, or if it is long-term profit, they are probably barking up the wrong tree.' 'If they are in the position to recognise the history and the traditions of whatever club they are buying I would say let's welcome the new owner with open arms.' It's a fairly good point. Abramovich has clearly never had any intention of making money out of Chelsea Football Club - his purchase of the club was purely driven by his love of the beautiful game. However, up in the North West, at Liverpool (still the biggest club in the country, Joe?) and Manchester United, American owners have saddled the respective clubs with debt after purchasing. On the subject of debt itself, a term which has so many different meanings in today's business landscape that it's difficult not to confuse even the most financially-savvy fan, Buck attempted to explain, 'I think everybody supports financial fair play but it depends how you do it. It is the fine print that is really the issue.' He went on to differentiate between the kind of debt that Chelsea have (or had) to Abramovich, and the type of debt that Manchester United and Liverpool have to the banks. Our debt, which has steadily been transferred into equity by Abramovich over recent years, offers no worrying problems for the football club. In fact, at the end of the last calendar year, the Russian transferred the remaining £340m owed to him by the club into equity, effectively making the football club debt-free. The new financial fair play rules, which Uefa are expected to roll out over the coming years, are related to not only debt but also loss-making. United, who published their latest accounts this morning, recorded a record £83.6m loss while Manchester City revealed in their accounts last week that they're currently spending more on player wages than they're recouping across the entire business. Chelsea, who are expected to announce their results in the next month or two, recorded a £44m annual loss at the end of 2009, although that was a £21.3 drop on the previous year and, after another year of more frugal spending coupled with domestic Double success, the results for 2010 could prove yet even more promising. Read more: |
Posted at 07/10/2010 13:01 by rb5 excellent if you are 4 years old you mean and don't understand muchI stopped reading at this point The latest act in this farce is the refusal of the owners to leave quietly and without taking the usual profit that investors rightly expect when they trade shares. Oh dear! |
Posted at 16/8/2010 10:23 by pomp circumstance CRA gang days are long gone for me! The grand national coverage was the funniest!Im an investor these days Rodney! Given wil be sent to Celtic on loan with a call back clause! they wont sell him for any money to us! Maybe we can get Reina for a million of two! |
Posted at 05/2/2010 11:43 by percy flage Not sure why this appeara at the bottom of an article about Wayne Bridge, perhaps it's not worthy of an articel all on its own, but...."Financially strapped owner Tom Hicks is exploring a possible sale of the Dallas Stars. The Hicks Sports Group said on Thursday the NHL team has retained Galatioto Sports Partners to look for new investors and explore the idea of selling a majority stake in the Stars. Team president Jeff Cogen says a sale is not a certainty. Last year, Hicks defaulted on a loan backed by the Stars and baseball's Texas Rangers. Hicks recently reached an agreement to sell the Rangers to a group led by Pittsburgh attorney Chuck Greenberg. The sale awaits approval from Major League Baseball. Hicks also co-owns Liverpool." |
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
