We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| China Food Co. | CFC | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 5.50 | 01:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.50 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 29/12/2016 05:07 by ny boy Jeez, talk about a well supported thread, obviously not many plastic CFC fans are investors lol |
Posted at 26/3/2014 10:21 by pomp circumstance Success is only just around the corner, the 10 year plan of building a new stadium with no external financial help is almost complete. Money generated will now be spend to increase the quality of the the squad to enable to more rotation as its pretty obvious that when the first XI are all available we one of few clubs who can win the premiership as was seen by them leading the premiership for long periods when all were available. I guess one of the few team who have a successful future to look forward to without the exposure to the freezing of assets of a single investor. |
Posted at 16/10/2013 11:06 by boffster I'm not surprised there has been 'additional investor demand' when paying 20% p.a.! Is this even legal? |
Posted at 24/9/2013 16:31 by serge gnabry "discourage foreign ownership" why?the only reason the PL is the best league in the world is because of foreign investors and players, |
Posted at 08/5/2013 06:05 by flateric Sir Alex Ferguson considering retiring as Manchester United manager before end of the weekSir Alex Ferguson's Manchester United future was shrouded in doubt on Tuesday night with the Scot understood to be giving serious consideration to ending his 26-year reign as manager. As rumours of the 71-year-old's imminent retirement swept Manchester, senior figures at the club failed to respond to repeated attempts to confirm or deny the story, which emerged following United's player versus coaches golf day at Dunham Massey on Tuesday afternoon. With United now forced to adhere to the strict rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange in terms of the release of significant information relating to the running of the club following last August's partial flotation, any change of management would fall within those requirements. As of Tuesday night, no statement over Ferguson's future had been issued by United. However, with sources close to the players confirming that the squad's golf day had been overshadowed by suggestions that the Scot would be making an announcement ahead of Sunday's clash with Swansea at Old Trafford, any ongoing uncertainty is unlikely to be allowed to continue to the point where it would affect the confidence of investors and, in turn, United's New York share price. When United's owners, the Glazer family, issued its prospectus for the club's £500m bond issue in January 2010, the prospect of Ferguson leaving the club and potentially jeopardising future success was raised by the Americans as one of the risk factors attached to investing in the club. Full story: |
Posted at 13/12/2012 10:06 by azalea One of a number of 'flakes' morphing around on threads. Even an amateur investor would make such a crass statement. |
Posted at 17/8/2012 05:22 by vig009 Dear Fellow InvestorsI've created a league in Fantasy Premier League called 2012-2013 Share Traders. Joining the league couldn't be easier. Simply use this link and you'll be added automatically after you've entered the game: You shouldn't need the league code, but just in case here it is: 1546655-344987. Enjoy the game! VIG009 |
Posted at 16/8/2012 11:08 by mrphiljones LOL....And your debt free and have investors who only care about the well being of Liverpool football club......PS....Have the painters finished in the new stadium yet? |
Posted at 31/7/2012 20:05 by flateric Manchester United share sale causes controversy among fans and investorsManchester United fans aren't happy. And looking at the terms of the proposed share sale in New York announced last night, it's not hard to see why. The Glazer family, the club's US owners, want to raise up to $330m (£210m) on Wall Street, having shelved plans to raise $1bn in Singapore. The problems lie with the terms of the sale, and what the Glazers intend to do with the money raised. Only part of the proceeds will go towards paying down the club's $680m debt, with a significant chunk going directly to the Glazers themselves. And the structure of the sale means the Glazers' Class B shares will have 10 times the voting power of the Class A shares sold to the public. "Supporters are going to be very angry about this," says Duncan Drasdo, chief executive of the Manchester United Supporters Trust. "The Glazers have already cost United more than £550m in debt-related fees and now we have another slap in the face as they help themselves to half of the proposed [sale] proceeds. 'No value' But it's not just the fans that are unhappy. More worrying perhaps for the Glazers, given their need to raise cash fast, some investors appear equally sceptical. "Shareholders are getting a shoddy deal," says Michael Jarman, chief equity strategist at H2O Markets, an ex-professional footballer and a United fan himself. "Investors are not idiots and there is simply no value in the company. The Glazers want to have their cake and eat it - the share structure shows they want to retain complete and utter control." He says there are plenty of other more attractive investments, where shareholders get a dividend and the chance for capital growth. While conceding that, "debt free, Manchester United is a good business", Mr Jarman sees no such value at Old Trafford given its current debt position. In fact, he argues the club is massively overvalued. At the upper range, the upcoming share flotation values Man Utd at more than $3bn. This is almost 50% more than the value placed upon it by Forbes magazine, which recently pronounced United, at $2.2bn, the most valuable club in world sport. But many analysts believe even this figures is vastly inflated. Less than two years ago, a group of investors led by the respected chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management, Jim O'Neill, valued the club at about $1.5bn. With two years of global economic stagnation since then, the club's value will not have risen significantly, if at all. Factor in operating profits - minus transfer activity - of $150m, and Mr Jarman argues investors are better off buying shares in Tesco. Full story: |
Posted at 11/7/2012 14:35 by flateric Has Batesy done it again...?Bahrain Sheikh in Leeds frame The mystery group of Middle East investors set to take control of Leeds is reportedly headed by Sheikh Abdulrahman bin Mubarak Al Khalifa. Sheikh Abdulrahman is a lifelong Leeds supporter and was previously linked with a failed takeover of the club in 2003. Bahrain-based newspaper Gulf Weekly has reported that friends have confirmed he is currently in Europe and unavailable for comment. According to the newspaper, Sheikh Abdulrahman told reporters in 2003: "I fell in love with the club when I was 11-years-old when Leeds played Chelsea in the 1970 FA Cup final. "Leeds mean everything to me, I was born to support them. Those who are closest to me, my friends and my family, know what Leeds United mean to me." Leeds confirmed at the end of last month that they had granted permission to an unnamed group of potential investors to conduct due diligence. |
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
