ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

ZIOC Zanaga Iron Ore Company Limited

6.83
-0.43 (-5.92%)
14 May 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Zanaga Iron Ore Company Limited LSE:ZIOC London Ordinary Share VGG9888M1023 ORD NPV (DI)
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -0.43 -5.92% 6.83 6.68 6.98 7.00 6.98 7.00 1,162,606 16:35:13
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Offices-holdng Companies,nec 0 8.1M 0.0128 5.45 44.18M
Zanaga Iron Ore Company Limited is listed in the Offices-holdng Companies sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker ZIOC. The last closing price for Zanaga Iron Ore was 7.26p. Over the last year, Zanaga Iron Ore shares have traded in a share price range of 3.80p to 18.40p.

Zanaga Iron Ore currently has 632,989,909 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Zanaga Iron Ore is £44.18 million. Zanaga Iron Ore has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 5.45.

Zanaga Iron Ore Share Discussion Threads

Showing 9051 to 9073 of 13825 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  373  372  371  370  369  368  367  366  365  364  363  362  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
09/3/2018
13:04
that is very enlightening tidy !!!
petebarnes1
09/3/2018
12:56
Extrader......I think your comparison is a strange one in any event.
The NHS is spending public money,something the public sector has never been very good at!

It is relevant because of any potential taxes as and when they appear,a shell company with decent recorded losses has value.....

aja5
09/3/2018
12:56
thanks tidy
petebarnes1
09/3/2018
12:53
i actually think glencore will want to sell & also zioc to a third party. And are just advertising the asset and its quality to the market. Rio tinto would be a prime buyer. I think the small development is just to show whats for sale. not glencores thing really
petebarnes1
09/3/2018
12:53
Great news mate, wish you all the best , i to feel we will multi bag this year
petebarnes1
09/3/2018
12:52
Pete.....just a few months.
I hope I have chance bed and isa some of my holding and will increase in the new tax year as well.The wife will all so become a share holder too in April

aja5
09/3/2018
12:50
Glencore back to profit in iron ore trade for 2017London (Platts)--21 Feb 2018 1039 am EST/1539 GMTCommodities group Glencore said Wednesday iron ore trading volume increased marginally in 2017 as it rebounded to profit for the business among a widening in pricing by grade with less low grade demand in China expected.Glencore traded 47.7 million mt of iron ore in 2017, up from 47.1 million mt in 2016, the Swiss trader said in a report. Glencore booked adjusted EBIT of $7 million for iron ore, from a loss of $9 million in 2016 on the same basis.Iron ore reference prices averaged 22% higher at $71/dry mt CFR China in 2017, on 2016. While the benchmark rose last year, higher quality grades such as 65% Fe fines, some concentrates and feeds, pellets and other products won higher relative price premiums, especially through to October, while lower quality ore discounts widened.Glencore said while the overall supply of iron ore may increase in 2018, a decrease in low grade cargoes exported to China may be seen, as steel margins incentivised purer less-polluting grades."In 2017, we believe iron ore prices decoupled from iron ore fundamentals, by following steel margins instead," Glencore said."Iron ore split further into different market segments: the price of low grade iron ore continued to decrease throughout the year, while higher grades benefited from improving steel markets, hence overall prices remained at fairly high levels," the report said."Discounts for lower grade and high silica cargoes have now reached a level that is starting to elicit a supply response."Glencore's prepayments to iron ore suppliers to be repaid through future iron ore deliveries over two years as of December 31, 2017, totalled $1.172 billion, down from $1.571 billion in 2016. A total $1.092 billion of the amount prepaid is provided by the bank market. "The repayment terms of which are contingent upon and connected to the future receipt of iron ore contractually due from the counterparty."--Hector Forster, hector.forster@spglobal.com--Edited by Jonathan Loades-Carter, jonathan.carter@spglobal.comhttps://www.platts.com/latest-news/metals/london/glencore-back-to-profit-in-iron-ore-trade-for-26895783
tidy 2
09/3/2018
12:49
Hi aja5,

Whatever.

The historic 'spend' is irrelevant to the buyer, tho' obviously the seller would like to get at least his costs back.

To show you why this is the case, consider the following (I'm approximating the numbers, but the principle holds) :

Two organisations spend £ 6 billion on hardware and £ 6 billion on software, for a total 'investment' of £ 12 billion.

One organisation - Google - developed a thing called a search engine. It was only one of a number on the market at the time, remember HotBot, Excite, WebCrawler, Ask Jeeves, Ask.com, Yahoo, Dogpile, AltaVista, Lycos, MSN Search, Bing, ...?

The other - our beloved NHS - invested in a system ( 'SPINE') to automate accessibility to patient records. It was a complete failure, ended up costing £ 20 billion and is considered one of the worst IT investments ever.



Google's investment of £ 12 billion was worth every penny and would be worth many multiples to a buyer. The NHS investment was written off.

Moral of the story ? Amounts already spent are completely irrelevant to the investment case.

HTH and ATB

extrader
09/3/2018
12:47
aja5 hope your well, looks like we could have a blue end to today al being well who knows. But the future is very bright. How long have you been invested here
petebarnes1
09/3/2018
12:43
Yes 2014
Either way it’s in the past!

aja5
09/3/2018
12:38
aja5 Extraders comments are out of date and wrong IMHO the rns was a game changer for us. Lets deal with the now and the future not the past.
petebarnes1
09/3/2018
12:14
I think your wrong.....but it’s really irrelevant in the long run,but I am of 5he opinion that glencore have spent $350 million to date and your saying $100 million
aja5
09/3/2018
12:11
Hi aja5,

No, I'm not : GLEN never invested $350 million (at least you're not stating £); GLEN acquired Xstrata, picking this project up in the process; Xstrata and ZIOC state this as their combined figure.

The ZIOC presentation I've already shown you re 'project costs' make this quite clear.

Quoting as your 'proof' another BB poster relaying an alleged comment by AT (of ZIOC) about the accounts of GLEN is laughable by comparison.

ATB

extrader
09/3/2018
11:42
Extrader......your coming round !!
Glencore have in their accounts the monies they have invested circa $350 million,then add on Jumelles/zioc costs into the mix......guess what it’s in excess of $700 million

aja5
09/3/2018
11:37
The very thing that sunk the share price was the decline in iron ore prices. The project was mothballed for this very reason. What we are seeing now is a shift to higher grade ore to help clean up the pollution in China. This is pushing the price of high grade ore ever higher. How long before India have to follow suit? It's called progress. As these large countries become more affluent then people demand better living standards. It's only 60 years ago our main cities especially London used to get smog due to pollution
1fox1
09/3/2018
11:27
tidy, I agree, the project value has increased in value due to 84% premium being paid for 65% grades, and Zanaga has 66.6%

Also, the cost of Stage One has decreased quite a bit.

topazfrenzy
09/3/2018
11:26
Who cares what people think, this project is progressing again and Glencore are fully on board, if people fail to see this then it's their problem, the real money will flow in here soon enough. PIs are lucky in the sense that they can get in now at this silly share price

Some are hoping it will go down further for them to buy back cheaper but it's looking like it may move up again by end of day, see them scramble to get back in if this suddenly moves up 20% lol

topazfrenzy
09/3/2018
11:24
Surely the value of the asset hasn't decreased in value in fact yesterdays RNS states its value is increasing in the current climate.
tidy 2
09/3/2018
11:15
with a much improved ore price
petebarnes1
09/3/2018
11:13
fox todays price is barmy IMHO , we are going to production of high quality resource with the big boys. !!!!
petebarnes1
09/3/2018
11:13
Hi tidy2,

Talking to AT he says Glencore still have Zanaga at the ipo price fwiw.

If true, they must have a different auditor to ZIOC, which took significant impairments - about $158.5 M worth - in 2014, the year their equity fell from US$ 230 M to US$ 60 M.

ATB

extrader
09/3/2018
11:09
Extrader. Yes I accept your point. The main news for me though is the project was mothballed three years ago due to the decline in iron ore value. The company made the correct move to conserve money doing the bare minimum to keep the project open. What we are seeing now is the project commencing to the original plan. Let's not forget the company floated at 160p late 2010 rising to 210p in early 2011. The difference is the project has since come a long way from the float. Hence in my view at today's price it is very undervalued.
1fox1
09/3/2018
11:06
The clock is ticking
topazfrenzy
Chat Pages: Latest  373  372  371  370  369  368  367  366  365  364  363  362  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock