
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ukraine | LSE:UKRO | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B0HW6117 | ORD USD 0.01 |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.45 | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
The Ukraine Opportunity Trust PLC
(the "Company")
Result of AGM
The Company announces that all of the Resolutions put to the Shareholders at the Company's Annual General Meeting held at 34 Brook Street, London  W1K 5DN on 18 June 2015 at 2:30pm were taken on a poll.
Resolutions 1 to 5 related to Ordinary Business. Resolutions 6 to 9 related to Special Business.
A poll was called on Resolution 1 (to receive, and if thought fit, to accept the Strategic Report, Directors’ Report and the audited Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2014). The results of the poll were as follows:
For | Against | Votes Withheld |
|||
Votes | % Votes Cast | Votes | % Votes Cast |
||
Resolution 1 (Approval of Accounts) Â |
470,384 | 23.46 | 1,534,424 | 76.54 | 0 |
Accordingly, Resolution 1 was declared not carried.
A poll was called on Resolution 2 (to receive and approve the Directors’ Remuneration Report for the year ended 31 December 2014). The results of the poll were as follows:
For | Against | Votes Withheld | |||
Votes | % Votes Cast | Votes | % Votes Cast |
||
Resolution 2 (Approval of Directors’ Remuneration Report)  |
470,384 | 23.46 | 1,534,424 | 76.54 | 0 |
Accordingly, Resolution 2 was declared not carried.
A poll was called on Resolution 3 (to re-appoint KPMG LLP as Auditor to the Company and to authorise the Directors to determine their remuneration). The results of the poll were as follows:
For | Against | Votes Withheld |
|||
Votes | % Votes Cast | Votes | % Votes Cast |
||
Resolution 3 (Re-appointment of KPMG LLP as auditor) Â |
1,091,353 | 54.44 | 913,455 | 45.56 | 0 |
Accordingly, Resolution 3 was declared carried.
A poll was called on Resolution 4 (to elect Ms Holland as a Director of the Company). The results of the poll were as follows:
For | Against | Votes Withheld |
|||
Votes | % Votes Cast | Votes | % Votes Cast |
||
Resolution 4 (Election of Ms Hollond as a Director of the Company.) Â |
465,000 | 23.19 | 1,539,808 | 76.81 | 0 |
Accordingly, Resolution 4 was declared not carried.
A poll was called on Resolution 5 (to re-elect Mr Chernobay as a Director of the Company). The results of the poll were as follows:
For | Against | Votes Withheld |
|||
Votes | % Votes Cast | Votes | % Votes Cast |
||
Resolution 5 (Re-election of Mr Chernobay as a Director of the Company.) |
470,384 | 23.46 | 1,534,424 | 76.54 | 0 |
Accordingly, Resolution 5 was declared not carried.
A poll was called on Resolution 6 (To authorise the Company to make market purchases of the Company’s shares pursuant to Section 701 of the Companies Act 2006). The results of the poll were as follows:
For | Against | Votes Withheld |
|||
Votes | % Votes Cast | Votes | % Votes Cast |
||
Resolution 6 (Authorisation to make market purchases of the Company’s shares) |
470,384 | 23.46 | 1,534,424 | 76.54 | 0 |
Accordingly, Resolution 6 was declared not carried.
A poll was called on Resolution 7 (To authorise the Directors to allot shares pursuant to Section 551 of the Companies Act 2006). The results of the poll were as follows:
For | Against | Votes Withheld |
|||
Votes | % Votes Cast | Votes | % Votes Cast |
||
Resolution 7 (Authorisation to allot shares)Â Â |
465,000 | 23.19 | 1,539,808 | 76.81 | 0 |
Accordingly, Resolution 7 was declared not carried.
A poll was called on Resolution 8 (To empower the Directors to allot equity securities pursuant to Section 570 and 573 of the Companies Act 2006 otherwise than in accordance with statutory pre-emption rights). The results of the poll were as follows:
For | Against | Votes Withheld |
|||
Votes | % Votes Cast | Votes | % Votes Cast |
||
Resolution 8 (Authorisation to disapply pre-emption rights)Â |
465,000 | 23.19 | 1,539,808 | 76.81 | 0 |
Accordingly, Resolution 8 was declared not carried.
A poll was called on Resolution 9 (To authorise the Directors to hold general meetings on 14 clear days’ notice). The results of the poll were as follows:
For | Against | Votes Withheld |
|||
Votes | % Votes Cast | Votes | % Votes Cast |
||
Resolution 9 (Authorisation to call a general meeting on not less than 14 clear days’ notice)  |
991,955 | 49.48 | 1,012,853 | 50.52 | 0 |
Accordingly, Resolution 9 was declared not carried.
Copyright e 19 PR Newswire
1 Year Ukraine Opportunity Trust Chart |
1 Month Ukraine Opportunity Trust Chart |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions