Triad Share Discussion Threads

[arthur_lame_stocks] 01/2/2019 13:58

I'd have to agree with you Valhamos. I haven't sold my shares yet, but I couldn't ever bring myself to buy more with this uncertainty hanging over the company.

The lack of communication from the board is very worrying.

I tried to phone Nick Burrows today, but i'm not expecting him to return my call.

[valhamos] 01/2/2019 13:52

Netcurtains


"You clearly haven't a clue"

Agreed. But I don't think I am alone here. I was expecting Triad's RNS of 3.1.19 to shed some light on the matter of substantial shareholdings. After all it was entitled "Statement re substantial shareholdings" But it doesn't do that which is very concerning.


"X has the shares back again minus some to pay off some debt."

What's with the "X"? Do you mean Mira Maker - if so why not say so? But is what you say true? If Mira Maker has a disclosable interest (or her holding restored on the company's shareholder list) why hasn't it been disclosed - the last accounts do not disclose any substantial holdings and there hasn't been an RNS about it since.


"so 100% forget the court case."

But it wasn't me that brought it up it was Triad in their 3.1.19 RNS. As I have said their statement is misleading and I want answers.




It all very well thinking there is tremendous value here but the words from the company tell a different story. Something does not add up.

[valhamos] 01/2/2019 09:12

Netcurtains

"With the court case as I understand it"

Which court case would that be? Are you referring to the RNS of 3.1.19? The one that says

"It has come to my attention that there are various degrees of confusion and uncertainty in public surrounding substantial shareholdings in Triad. I refer shareholders and any other interested parties to a recent claim lodged in the High Court (High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Media and Communications List, Claim Number QB-2018-000581"

If so have you managed to find out anything about this alledged court case? I ask as you suggest you have come to some understanding about it.

The RNS acknowledges the existence of confusion and uncertainty but it has done nothing to enlighten us. If fact it has made matters worse. We are left with the impression of the directors being deliberately secretive. There is also an allegation that the RNS is inaccurate and misleading.

I think we need the directors to be replaced. Until such time as we have a board that is competent to communicate with shareholders the company is uninvestable.

[netcurtains] 31/1/2019 17:21

At this price I almost feel like selling the house and bunging the entire lot into the company.

[valhamos] 31/1/2019 09:14

netcurtains- What's the point of your posts? You would be far better served by agreeing that TRD directors need to start communicating with shareholders. Until such time as they do this company remains uninvestable to many because as your thread header says the company is unbelievable.

[buywell3] 24/1/2019 13:48

macd in header not looking very nice

[valhamos] 22/1/2019 13:03

Still no clarification from TRD about the 3.1.19 RNS - Nick Burrows was supposed to be sorting this out further to Wilmdav's enquiries.

The company needs to start providing some answers, otherwise you are left with the impression that TRD is cheap for a reason, in other words 'too good to be true'. Posters saying this is cheap were saying the same when it was twice its current price.

Disclosure: I have a small holding but I am looking for the company to start communicating in a responsible fashion.

[pride23s] 20/1/2019 19:49

classic Ben Graham stock.

[netcurtains] 20/1/2019 08:50

Since it should be trading at over £1 (cash pile getting bigger each year). Its already about a 3 bagger.

It cant really go much lower because it cant really trade below its cash pile because then it will be worth MINUS MONEY which is ridiculous.

Be honest how often do companies have a share price (market cap) lower than their cash pile?

Cheers Net.

[pride23s] 19/1/2019 16:43

In that case don't invest and move on to your next idea....

[owenski] 19/1/2019 15:07

Things that go down don't always go up - they often go even lower and then sometimes disappear.

Things that go up tend to go up even more.

Buy high and sell even higher.

Cheap usually implies rubbish, quality always costs more.

[s34icknote] 18/1/2019 22:14

Buy when there is fear on the streets !Sicknote

[netcurtains] 18/1/2019 17:54

owenski: But why not? Surely this is just the time to invest when its down?
You're meant to buy cheap and sell high..
This is ridiculously cheap.