Transglobe Energy Share Discussion Threads

[1399peter] 07/8/2018 13:10

Well if indeed we have given anything away it will be included in the end of year results.

Demanding answers from this lot, that's the funniest thing I have heard for a while.

And it wouldn't change anything anyway.

[singray105] 07/8/2018 11:53

Yes that’s it, 3 years from launch of the product. So we should be ok there with that, unless of course this is not the CQC quantum key and something different.

[mark10101] 07/8/2018 11:08

FB it was 3 years from commercialisation.

[firefly bill] 07/8/2018 10:38

I thought it was once it was commercialised and was being sold. I could be wrong though as it was so long ago!

[singray105] 07/8/2018 09:54

Did we not have those rights for a limited time though, 3 years rings a bell. But the quantum key was due to be launched 2 years ago of course.

[firefly bill] 07/8/2018 08:56

How do you know that Smart? Also where does that leave us with the distribution rights of selling the quantum key in Europe?

[smart_investor] 07/8/2018 08:39

Some of you guys should ring up the company and start putting pressure on these guys in charge. Demand answers.

My understanding is Intelicrypt do not own as much as 2% in CQ anymore. We apparently have given some of that to Shanhill to pay some debts we owe them.

[danieldanj] 07/8/2018 07:26

Key date approaching for TransGlobe Energy’s (TGL) shareholders

[mark10101] 06/8/2018 18:05

Thanks Peter, I remain hopeful and it certainly seems that things are getting interesting whether we are allowed to capitalise on it or not. Thanks for your posts.

[1399peter] 06/8/2018 17:08

Singray

Obviously we don't know as yet. We can only assume the possible outcomes.

I seem to remember the wording of our investment in CQC giving us the rights to distribute anything that CQC produced. So there would be a good legal point.

I am thinking along the lines that JSR will take Itelicrypt out for as little as possible and get those rights and the 2% stake in CQC. They clearly have an interest in CQC, but $10m investment is petty cash for a company worth over £3billion.

If Ironbridge is creating a stir in the right places then we could see things hotting up a bit.

You could even see Google wanting a stake.

[singray105] 06/8/2018 16:31

Likely outcome will be to screw us all over, a leopard does not change it spots. We might have to group together and get some legal advice sooner or later, I’ve had it from this lot now, being taken for a cu...!

[1399peter] 06/8/2018 15:04

1)

JSR Corporation increases its shareholding in CQC
Cambridge Quantum Computing (“CQC”) is pleased to confirm that JSR Corporation has increased its ownership of CQC to approximately 5.5%

(Crunchbase shows that was $10m investment)


About JSR Corporation

JSR Corporation is a multinational company employing over 7,000 people worldwide and a leading materials supplier in a variety of technology driven markets. JSR’s global network is headquartered in Tokyo (Japan) and has factories and offices in Japan, Europe, US, China, Taiwan and Korea. JSR is a research-oriented organization that pursues close collaborations with leading innovators in a number of industries that are a key to the present and future welfare of human society: electronic materials, life-sciences, synthetic rubbers, display and optical materials. For more information about JSR Corporation, please go to www.jsr.co.jp

And valued at £14 per share, 226m shares in issue

July 24, 2018

And


2)

Cambridge Quantum Computing integrates Google’s CIRQ framework into proprietary software stack
Cambridge Quantum Computing (CQC) and Google are pleased to announce collaboration in quantum computing. As part of the collaboration, CQC will utilize the open source CIRQ framework developed by Google and the state-of-the- art 72-qubit “Bristlecone” quantum processor to develop software designed specifically for quantum computers. The potential of such technology is difficult to overstate, promising to revolutionize fields ranging from chemistry to finance, from encryption to AI.Read the full article…

July 18, 2018


Looks like Ilyas is flying high and perhaps going to give the distribution of Ironbridge to JSR.

Or because the distribution had already been given to Intelicrypt, JSR now has to make us an offer to get those rights. And of course our share of CQC

Orrrrrrr as Stanhill have already hinted at we only had that deal with ticket, so perhaps we could see some slippery action from Ilyas and CQC to screw us all over

[darola] 25/7/2018 23:18

I’m out for the moment. Q2 update didn’t really dazzle. Expected volumes and the bad news of a $1m duster. I’m sure this will push forward again when it’s taken a breather....

[shakeypremis] 25/7/2018 18:46

I think a nice buying opportunity is going to present itself here in the coming weeks.

[moormoney] 21/7/2018 18:07

I am trying to move away from Aim shares now having had enough of the tricks they pull I too have quite a list! Luckily tern is helping balance my losses and I am holding tight for the ride
My new picks are both Main market oilers. UOG and UPL. A safer bet I hope.🤞ԍ10;

[singray105] 21/7/2018 14:01

Has anything that they have ever said to us amounted to much Mark?

[mark10101] 20/7/2018 22:05

Ok thanks Peter

[1399peter] 20/7/2018 21:27

Mark,

Sorry i can't pin it down to either of those possible scenarios. I think it will just be the year end results and a look into the future positive statement which as we know doesn't really amount to much

[firefly bill] 19/7/2018 21:21

I to bought in a big ish way when this was a gold company. I to believed all the hype and didn’t pull my money out then. What I don’t understand at the moment is why communication is coming from Stanhill and not an Intelicrypt employee such as Idris or Trevor? Surely they would be better equipped to provide the detail to the questions asked?

[mark10101] 19/7/2018 20:19

Hi Peter, was that said in a possitive way or a official you are toast way?

[1399peter] 19/7/2018 19:33

Well I was told by the man a Stanhill to wait until Sept for an official statement.

So lets see what comes with the final results.

[chesycustard] 19/7/2018 18:28

I think the land lease just lapsed unfortunately. Only the research and study had tangible value as I understood it.

[singray105] 19/7/2018 15:40

You too then cheesy, yes they have kept very quiet about that research and what did they do with all the land that we bought too?

[chesycustard] 19/7/2018 12:42

I bought in TGL gold originally on broker recommendation. I never found out if we sold on our exploration research which had value

[singray105] 19/7/2018 12:23

Talking about stinking to high heaven, I had in fact already been an invesor in the old tgl, the gold explorer that went from close to 30p a share when coming to market to under 1p. They kept turning up high grades of gold and the share price just kept falling, no one could work out why this was. They didn’t even issue the widely expected apx 1m oz maiden resource before things went sour and no reasonable explanation was ever given. So you can see that I have been cought out twice with the IK mob.