We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Totally Plc | LSE:TLY | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BYM1JJ00 | ORD 10P |
| Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.03 | 0.57% | 5.25 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 5.25 | 5.25 | 5.25 | 49,910 | 08:00:00 |
| Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Newspaper:pubg, Pubg & Print | 135.7M | 1.78M | 0.0091 | 5.77 | 10.32M |
| Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26/12/2018 20:20 | STT - while on 10th August we could reasonably have different opinions about whether TLY shares were low-risk or high-risk as an investment opportunity going forward, we now have some data with which to revisit those opinions. I'm arguing that the near 50% fall in share price since that date, without a "black swan" event to explain it, means I can't see how, in hindsight, a "low-risk" assessment, as of 10th August, could possibly have been correct. To me it is just transparently wrong, with the benefit of seeing subsequent share price movement. If you are arguing that your assessment of "low-risk" as of 10th August was correct, how do you explain the near 50% fall in share price since that date? Or do you see that as normal for what you think of as "low-risk" investments? | 1gw | |
| 26/12/2018 18:53 | 1gw, You're the one who is asking about my risk/reward assessment... Why should anyone base their risk/reward opinions on what YOU say? Don't you like posters having their own opinion... I see you still got NOTHING to say about TLY STRATEGY or NHS PLANS - just targeted, loaded posts... EVERYONE SHOULD FORM THEIR OWN OPINION... | sikhthetech | |
| 26/12/2018 18:44 | On the basis of what information would I change my risk assessment? It is very definitely still high risk in my opinion. High risk but potentially high reward, like a number of my holdings. Do you not understand that someone can believe a high risk investment is still a good one for them, especially as part of a portfolio of similar investments? I have a number of (what I believe are) high-risk investments and quite possibly 1 or more of them won't make it, or if they do make it will only do so after significant dilution. But I try not to mislead other posters into believing that a high-risk investment is actually low-risk. | 1gw | |
| 26/12/2018 18:28 | 1gw, "Have you thought about reconsidering your risk assessment?" Were you looking in the mirror when you wrote that... You claimed to buy 5 times because the potential upside outweighs the risks.. Don't you believe in your own conviction... 1gw22 Oct '18 - 14:26 - 5898 of 6905 Moderate | Ban 0 1 1 As I believe I have tried to explain at length stt, there are positive and negative aspects to an investment in tly (and to most if not all investments). I have invested because on balance I believe the potential upside of a multibagger if they get Vocare right outweighs the potential downside of it going under or needing to raise more finance on dilutive terms if they get Vocare wrong. | sikhthetech | |
| 26/12/2018 16:08 | sikhthetech 24 Dec '18 Could GDPR Consent String Fraud | football | |
| 24/12/2018 14:06 | STT - your "low risk" investment has lost close to 50% of its value in 4 1/2 months. Have you thought about reconsidering your risk assessment? 25.0p close on 10th August (source: Yahoo! Finance) 13.2p close on 24th December -------------------- sikhthetech - 10 Aug 2018 - 14:35:26 - 4770 of 6904 "Wouldn't you say it was just a little desperate to present Totally's cash balance relative to market cap as somehow indicative of a low risk investment?" No...to me it's low risk...as I've explained/asked.. look at last year's placing and their prior fy2016 accounts.. But it is desperate for you to imply that the balance sheet is a major issue without referring to the previous accounts and successful placings... risk/reward... -------------------- | 1gw | |
| 24/12/2018 11:49 | Debts: then ad up assets and revenue/profits, lol. Also, provide figures if so knowledgeable... This is pure manipulation. TLY is worth at least 30% more than 13p... | alamaison5 | |
| 24/12/2018 11:30 | Own or owe? | the big fella | |
| 24/12/2018 11:10 | Cash in the bank but they own MORE THAN That! | football | |
| 24/12/2018 11:06 | TLY: A true bargain. Trading at cash value in the bank. Grotesque... | alamaison5 | |
| 24/12/2018 10:45 | NHS commissioning ‘needs period of stability to transform’ | sikhthetech | |
| 24/12/2018 10:43 | Merry Christmas all genuine posters... | sikhthetech | |
| 22/12/2018 15:49 | GPs reporting 'scandalous' extra costs and workload under new GDPR rules and that must be adding to totallys costs here aswell and don't forget the wage rises eating into any profits here not looking good is it STT | football | |
| 22/12/2018 14:49 | #paranoiddelusional #livinginthepast #onthewrongthread | 1gw | |
| 22/12/2018 13:41 | 1gw, You mean you, Shroder, Football etc found the posts disruptive... BBs exist to discuss and form opinions, don't they? If YOU find someone disruptive then filter them... but then again, why didn't Shroder and why don't Football and you??? Blnx (now Rthm) bought Zango and were alleged to been involved in malware through their subsidiaries... Their accounts showed that revenues, cash, profit/loss dropped sharply after they closed the subsidiaries down and several posters still think rthm are not out of the woods yet...then why did Football create a new thread and ban them? Everyone can form their own opinion on whether that is a coincidence or not.. I think the revenue drop was because they closed Pinball Corp website... The point is everyone is entitled to express an opinion, if they so wish. why do you get upset if someone posts and opinion which differs from yours? Unless of course you are #paranoiddelusional ;-) rthm accounts - FORM YOUR OWN OPINION.. Jan 2009 - Blinkx buys 'certain' Zango assets after it's foreclosure increasing revenues, cash, becoming profitable... fy2009 $13.9m, $21.3m, ($8.8m) fy2010 $33.6m, $14.5m, ($8.5m) fy2011 $66.1m $52.8m $7.6m fy2012 $114.4m $38.4m $3.9m fy2013 $198m $55.9m $17.4m fy2014 $247.2m $126.9m $12.2m Q4 2014. Jan 2014 Blog. Pinball website closed Feb 2014.. July 2014 profit warning. Decreasing revenues, cash and now losses... fy2015 $214.9m $95.7m ($20.8m) fy2016 $166.7m $78.4m ($92.3m) Zango: "A spokesman for video search engine company Blinkx said that although Blinkx had purchased some of Zango's technical assets such as servers, Zango was shut down after the consortium foreclosed.[21][22] 100% of Zango's assets were sold to Blinkx, in what the Zango CEO characterized as a "fire sale".[23] When asked about employees, a Blinkx spokesman said "As Zango was insolvent, we believe all the employees were laid off."[20] It was later announced that ZangoCash was to become Pinball Publisher Network, part of the Pinball corporation, though it would still be operating under its own name with no change to its services.[24]" Form your own opinion.. | sikhthetech | |
| 22/12/2018 09:29 | Ancient history, but if you insist on dredging it up stt, then only fair to give a flavour of how disruptive your behaviour was even then. -------------------- Shroder - 11 Dec 2014 - 09:57:06 - 4776 of 11771 sikythetech, I have no intention of trawling through 10,000's of your posts thanks very much. The fact is you post obsessively with a total disregard for facts or other posters opinion. This is the main reason why I decided to step away from posting here because of the noise you generate. Looking at your posting style I am not sure if it's intentional or just obsessive behaviour, either way it's had the same effect. I have posted 1gw's reply to you a week or so ago. You still seem to respect his opinion, so please pay close attention to what he has written. I am sure many posters on here share his view. ____________________ 1gw 4 Dec'14 - 14:11 - 4569 of 4573 4 1 STT I'm not disputing that leadimpact exists, is owned by blinkx and has staff. What I'm questioning is whether the revenue you quote is at all up-to-date or accurate. It may be, it may not be. Given what the same source says about zango, my suspicion is that it is not. This is what posters mean by you being disruptive. You are convinced there is a conspiracy to hide relevant information about blinkx. But it seems to me you have become just as blinkered as the posters you despise - refusing to consider rational counter-arguments and just repetitively posting the same stuff and trying to provoke others. | 1gw | |
| 21/12/2018 23:25 | a definition of paranoid delusional = sikhthetech i think that's about right sikhthetech21 Dec '18 - 18:06 - 1174 of 1175(premium) 0 2 0 "How about a definition of paranoid delusional?" | football | |
| 21/12/2018 19:03 | #paranoiddelusional | 1gw | |
| 21/12/2018 18:44 | you mean Shroder stopped posting AFTER he was outed for his BS ramping posts and deliberately hiding the big RED flags about blnx (now rthm) subsidiaries, Pinball Corp, Leadimpact, Verti Tech etc... His posts were also well written and sounded plausible.. As you discovered much later, Leadimpact was a subsidiary, wasn't it? rthm (ex blinkx) subsidiaries... sikhthetech 31 Mar'15 - 15:46 - 7545 of 11757 0 0 edit Shroder, what's your view on LeadImpact... You seemed to have forgotten to mention them as part of your posts on Blnx businesses... Shroder 31 Mar'15 - 15:52 - 7548 of 11757 0 0 <...> stt, I have no idea what that company is or does, only the current blinkx business model which is complicated enough. | sikhthetech | |
| 21/12/2018 18:27 | Stt - seriously - ask a good friend to read that post 6887 of yours and ask him or her to tell you honestly what they think of it. | 1gw | |
| 21/12/2018 18:15 | In actual fact stt, isn't that post (in your post 6886) from several weeks after shroder stopped posting regularly - driven away by the ridiculous conspiracy-theory posting by you and barkboo? He came back for that 1 day as far as I can see because you and barkboo kept quoting him in your posts and he wanted to set the record straight. | 1gw | |
| 21/12/2018 18:13 | EVERYONE SHOULD FORM THEIR OWN OPINION.... SHOULDN'T THEY, 1gw? EVERYONE SHOULD READ THE POSTS - many more... same message... BOTH same message - inconsistency in my posting.. Brassneck say "I'm STILL struggling with.." ONE WEEK after 1gw's post... 1gw_ on lse 1gw: RTHMRE: Stt consistency 12 Jul '18 <...> But the inconsistency of stt's positions on the 2 companies is breathtaking. brassneck on lse: brassneck: RTHMRE: GDPR 18 Jul '18 Stt, <...> I'm still struggling with why you post incessantly on here where you don't hold and yet never post on TLY where you do hold and there are all sorts of challenges to worry about. Even about the DataXu litigation... same day, same message...poor quality research/throwing mud... condescending posts.. phrased slightly differently... Brassneck on LSE Usual Stt research 1 Aug '18 I see Stt and Jonc on ADVFN continue with poor quality, ill researched statements and moronic posts after borgioli confirmed the Â&Acir Do read the annual report, page 63, which clearly states: On 2 February 2018, the Group acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of YuMe, Inc. (YuMe), a Redwood City, California based company for a consideration of $163.4 million which consisted of $61.6m in cash consideration and 26,048,596 of RhythmOneÃ&ce Clear and unambiguous. 1gw on advfn 1gw 1 Aug '18 - 21:11 - 7874 of 10008 Moderate | Ban 0 4 1 I thought the litigation settlement was old news and nothing to do with dataxu? Still throw any old mud and hope some sticks? -------------- loafofbread 14 Jun '18 - 08:38 - 14649 of 15707 0 6 2 J4, $10M acquisition costs and a further $5M of exceptionals not to be repeated this year. I also read that we got $42M in cash from YUME so that's better than we thought. (There is a $0.9M litigation cost in there which came across from Yume. I wouldn't want anyone to think it was for another case!) A solid base to move up from. Both 1gw and brassneck mention UT on the same day.. Brassneck: RTHMRE: Late Post 26 Sep '18 Instadeth, no need to worry, those 2 trades were yesterday, 25th Sept not today. Given the UT distorted the close I would expect an open around 232 though. 1gw - 26 Sep 2018 - 15:44:02 - 9032 of 10009 RHYTHMONE - new Name, new Beginning??? - RTHM Not that I'm complaining, but how did they get the UT to 240p? so you and brassneck decide what to post about before you start posting.. Cash/revenue.. same message...revenue isn't volatile/cash is Brassneck RTHMRE: TU / Cash 18 Oct '18 Instadeth, Iâ&acir 1gw - 28 Sep 2018 - 08:10:41 - 9074 of 10009 RHYTHMONE - new Name, new Beginning??? - RTHM Revenue isn't as volatile. They should be able to make a reasonable estimate, perhaps with a bit of sandbagging, a short period ahead of time. Cash all depends on whether bills get paid or not between now and the end of the half. You should be able to make a reasonable estimate of what bills you're going to pay yourself, but you have very little control over whether some of your bigger overdue or about-to-be-due accounts are going to settle before or after period end. They could have reported the latest known cash balance but chose not to. Perhaps they decided with net cash as of year-end and a good adjusted EBITDA estimated for the half-year, the precise cash balance as of some date before period end wouldn't be a very significant metric for investors? | sikhthetech | |
| 21/12/2018 17:55 | Your post.. when Shroder was ramping rthm, was blnx... Notice he was also ramping Byot, a share you and football both own and thread you both post on 1gw - 09 Nov 2015 - 15:14:17 - 10868 of 11771 blinkx - BLNX Somewhat wary of doing this, but if it helps, I can confirm that I do now talk fairly frequently to shroder about blinkx and other investments that one or both of us may hold. As it seems very difficult to have a sensible and balanced conversation on these blinkx bulletin boards about common investing questions of interest, we have reverted to the more time-consuming but ultimately more effective method of direct communication for some discussions. What's the definition of working in Cahoot? In most contexts, it describes the conspiring activity of people up to no good. | sikhthetech | |
| 21/12/2018 17:50 | Resorting to bare-faced lies doesn't help your credibility stt, I would suggest. I don't post as brassneck on lse and I do post independently of other posters. | 1gw |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
