Tlou Energy Share Discussion Threads

[donkey40] 17/1/2018 11:44

So wheniamfree is indeed the great Tidd - having said he wasn’t. I have claimed no credit for anything - your words, not mine. All this company really has is the play on their Reaerves.

You trot out the long list of great partners - for 10 miserable MWs as a starting salvo. Leading industry players making a splash in a new country/market, having looked at the project for 2+ years - and they go for 10MW first up. And to prepare that Bid for Govt was a ‘monumental task’ in the words of TG and GG, from announcements.

And someone told me to stop smoking the whacky backy; ‘oh the irony’.

Anyway, I now realise the same posters that have ruined LSE as a board, are largely the same clowns here. And some also on HC - and I am criticised by them for being on multiple boards. ‘Oh the irony’ again.

Keep posting your inane promotional tripe on this company - yes, longer term it should do well or much better. As for listening to most of your groundless senseless regurgitation of Tlou announcements - go do some real research on the ground, in the country. Learn about the real politics of the place - maybe then some of your eyes will open.

Hurry up and announce the Bid outcome please Mr Govt - that should settle once and for all you actually knows what they are talking about here.

Cheers, DYOR, hope that helps and all the other senseless pointless donkey doo doo you can think of. Maybe it is the donkey Pooh that smells bad round here - and maybe it isn’t !! Time will tell .....

[satsuma1] 17/1/2018 11:04

Hi Donkey, long time reader, first time poster. Reading through everyones comments here, i can't help but wonder why you are here? Given you don't approve of the companies method for developing and don't believe in the project, what drives you to post on all the boards? I ask because I like to take everyones views into consideration but I'm struggling with yours. I can understand peoples positive views if they are invested, perhaps being overly optimistic can happen. However if you dislike the company and prospects and their methods, presumably you haven't invested and so have no reason to post? Albeit anyone is free to comment on anything online, I just don't follow why you'd go to so much effort? If i understood that i'd find it easier having faith in your views along with others. thanks.

[wheniamfree] 17/1/2018 07:56

Correct ferris, there is a deadline which should be met to respond to.

If donkey has genuine questions, he’d do well to actually contact the company and they would be more than happy to discuss I am sure. Having spoken to them myself on numerous occassions they don’t shy away to questions.

The fact this user moves from LSE, HC and now here posting the same questions and given the same answers speaks volumes. If he was a genuine holder he would contact the company and discuss and then decide whether this investment was for him.

That isn’t the case and has never been the case. Ask yourself why.

[ferris_bueller] 17/1/2018 07:42

fwiw

This StockTube interview with TG, give an explanation on the gradual program for 2, 10, 20, & 50MW.

Its to do with preventing/managing energy loss over the existing poles & cables.



for those that don't want to watch the whole interview jump to 4 mins in.

TG also updates on RFP response period to anytime during Q1 2018.

regards
ferris

[wheniamfree] 17/1/2018 05:53

10mw is explained in my earlier post. As usual, given an answer and completely ignore it.

You’ve posted the same thing on every forum on numerous occassions. Ever heard the phrase “get some new material” ?

Very apt.

I’d suggest users begin to report, there is no discussion to have with someone who never listens and regurgitates the same diatribe.

[katiegos] 17/1/2018 03:57

eye yore eye yore 5p/6p investment goes to 18p drops back to 15p big deal

still got a big smile on my face thanks very much

[coley15] 16/1/2018 22:53

Please please stop replying to the bellend. Was bad enough on LSE.

[donkey40] 16/1/2018 22:51

Fantastic list of Advisors and partners. How come all they can deliver in the first up Bid is around 10MW?! How come you just don’t get it ?

After all this time - 10 miserable MWs of electricity by middle 2019 earliest. Strong partners, capable advisors and fund raisers, only company with certified reserves, EIA and ML approved and issued - for a first up 10MW. Why not 50MW??

These are the kind of questions that should be being asked. Not constant repetition that transformational news is imminent - we have been hearing that for 6+ months - and frankly I’m bored reading that same drivel.

[cdawg] 16/1/2018 22:31

wheniamfree - thanks for so eloquently expanding on my point - very well said, and the links to back your points up too... Cheers

[donkey40] 16/1/2018 22:20

How this company is going to develop - now there is a good question. Bid outcome and reserves upgrade are the 2 pieces of next expected news - so where does share price go when both are known ?

Another double or treble form current levels? Maybe both already in the share price?

Ft ft - come on, play just this once

[wheniamfree] 16/1/2018 21:57

Just to help carry the above statement;

[wheniamfree] 16/1/2018 21:43

“Every time lads, every time. Criticise criticise and criticise - it’s all seem to know.”

Oh the irony.

[wheniamfree] 16/1/2018 21:40

By your own admission you acknowledged that reserves would be the major key to this project. You were told as much on HC and you claimed the glory here earlier (despite having had it spelt out to you).

A firm 10mw staged approached sounds plausible, it’s a new industry so offsets Risk and gives the ability to raise debt based finance at a favourable rate whilat still allowing for economy of scale.

Just to elaborate on cdawgs point, you have Tlou a Company leading a gas to power project from CBM the first of its kind in country taking a sensible and manageable approach despite being somewhat 3-5 years ahead of any competitor. You have a strong management team of people who have completed these projects before, in principle financial backers including infrastructure funds such as Quantum Global. Project management of Tome international and IPC to carry out the upstream and midstream developments. Notable names in the industry all behind this project along with input from the likes of General Electric the global conglomerate who have been closely working with Tlou for some time. Countless heads, hands and minds of proven world wide projects all pushing forward in an agreeable manner. You have the recent injection of around £2.4m from a Pension fund local to Botswana.

And then, then you have donkey who things nothing is right and everything is wrong.

[donkey40] 16/1/2018 21:36

Every time lads, every time. Criticise criticise and criticise - it’s all seem to know. Eeyooore

[donkey40] 16/1/2018 20:27

Here comes the followers in the harem. Predictable - been there, seen that.

Have a good night.

Oh Tlou - what do other people think if Bid lands and their up to 10MW is awarded, with nice encouraging words about more as and when and as soon as you can supply BPC? How about we discuss those kind of scenarios now, coz we’ll thats really why we are all here. Remembering no revenues earned from the 10MW probably before H2-19 calendar year - hard to see earnings prospects blasting the share price in that scenario. Seriously happy to be persuaded otherwise - honestly I am !!

[donkey40] 16/1/2018 18:09

Agree that Tidd has got a lot on Tlou correct - no doubts on that. As for easing off on whatever I am smoking - pot is increasingly legal these happy days.

He isn’t the only one that knows something about CBM in Botswana; maybe he should be less rash about disrespecting others.

Sadly the Tlou board on LSE is just petty rubbish now - why is that. Because anybody with anything else to say, that doesn’t blend with the in-crowd, are not welcome.

Tlou is still very much a wannabe company with potentially a bright share price performance ahead. But the blue sky BS and news just around the corner mantra 10 times weekly just isn’t necessary either !

[wheniamfree] 16/1/2018 17:39

To be quite frank Donkey, Tidd has gotten a hell of a lot right in comparison to what you have and he has corrected you on numerous occassions so whilst he may not be infallible (who is) I’ve invested on a number of stocks that he has and he generally has a keen eye. Needless to say it is absolutely irrelevant, I’ve made my own decisions on Tlou and I have also seen you post some horrific and misleading statements which is why it is clear you have an ulterior motive to go to the extent that you have.
Where is your bull case and why not provide it?
I’d also ease off on whatever it is your smoking, i am not even on HC so that’s two paranoid statements made which like everything else you post are incorrect.

[money4me] 16/1/2018 17:28

Donkey i wasnt asking you to do research for me. you seemed to want to discuss concerns. i am always happy to listen to valid concerns where it could impact my views. why else do you think i post on here. i have no time to spend arguing the toss about stuff. i am not the inside man as many may seem to think they are.2 things are comingnews on reservesnews on Rfpi am positive on both. do you have a view

[ernestsyngen] 16/1/2018 17:19

I am dissatisfied that we are yet to have news although to be fair, my expectations were derived from posters here.

I hope it won’t be too much longer , I don’t like red days.

[wheniamfree] 16/1/2018 17:03

Donkey if this share isn’t for you as it wasn’t on LSE and wasn’t on HC why do you have such an infatuation? You have been corrected countless times historically and as an avid reader of most forums have seen you post the same things time and time again. I pointed out two points which showed the clear lack of grasp you had on the fundamentals of Tlou and it’s strategy. I remember reading back on LSE where for weeks you questioned the reserve certification and a CPR produced by an Independant third party. (Now that really was the cherry on the cake on how to solidify your lack of understanding.)
I have liaised with Tidd and many more on LSE but in that regard you have guessed wrong with my alias. I do not post on LSE as often as I have historically but I do recall reading your posts and was glad to see the back of you following your ban before you tried to evade it on two occassions (yes I have a good memory).

You are regurgitating the same old rubbish time and time again skipping from one thing to the next with no solid basis. Had I not read all this before (and seen the answers supplied to you) I would entertain you but you have no appetite to invest just to try and derail a forum and find fault with Tlou.

Most of what you post needs correcting and is wrong and then, you attend a new forum and post it all as though your researched having been informed elsewhere of the actual fact.

Embarrassing isn’t the word.