Tlou Energy Share Discussion Threads

[donkey40] 16/1/2018 16:39

wheniamfree - like I said, I dont care if you believe me or not. Somebody shows me a document and I am supposed to say, Hey give me a digital copy so I can post it online, so my 'followers' will believe me. OMG. Anyway, if you are Tidd, you alluded to having seen the same document on LSE months ago. Better still, go ask your mate Sasha at IR to confirm or dent if the RFP said Govt aimed to respond in 6 weeks - rather than having a pop at me (as always). And the best bit - you know I am right, so typing your last post must really wrangle you.
Sekaname - you are also the one posting the tripe about Panama Papers and fracking scandal and losing leases. What the difference is in fracking and stimulation is not of one blind bit of interest to me. Bot are much of a muchness; and both are ok by me. But no doubt the Greenies will violently disagree.

Reserves - no I did not think it up myself. AdrianB on hotcopper posted on excellent post regarding early strategy outlined by TG. WM and TG developed 2 gas prospects before and sold them to the majors for development. I 100% expect them to try do same here; just as I expect Sekaname to do the same, if they are also in this game. The Bid award so give some clarity there - agree ??

But I did raise on LSE and HC that 326m shares in issue are a lot, and they dont have a lot yet to show for the historical spend (ie now about US$50). And I was told this was hugely irrelevant by Tidd, and others on LSE. Well I didn't then, and I dont now, see that as being irrelevant. Oh and also they were fully funded to end 2018, when 306m shares were in issue - but the BPOPF issue is fine coz it makes them a BSE listed local entity. Sure it does and sure it is good business - but I wasn't the one changed my tune to suit the story board as it was being played - Tidd was !!

Am I getting through yet .......

[am99999] 16/1/2018 16:29

Interesting view - And one I believe I have seen you describe elsewhere before when the share price was much lower. Are you interested in holding this share - if it were just for the reserve play as you describe. If not I find it confusing - as you say in your post why would you post to help "a total stranger, make money. Wow." I presume you dont post to save us money either.

Time will tell if your views are correct.

[acrussell] 16/1/2018 16:23

I'm confused. You complain that you have no outlet for raising concerns (or offering different opinions) without being shot down, yet when Money asks you in a reasonable tone for those exact opinions you recoil in horror at the thought of providing them.


It is unfortunate for you that your communication skills impact the way that you are perceived across the bulletin boards.

[donkey40] 16/1/2018 16:07

money4me - so you expect me to post my concerns here just to help you, a total stranger, make money. Wow.

Well - it doubled in the past while on expectation of news. The news was imminent pre-Xmas and is still eminent today. But it will come - when exactly - no idea. Put the retail rampers know only one thing - talk it up all the time !! That is what most of them do here - occasionally someone posts something on some of the boards that suggests they are knowledgeable enough. Their voices sadly are drowned out by the rest.

My view, for what it is worth, is this company is pure and simple a play on Reserves. The RFP is means to an end, which will allow them to publish higher Reserves which in turn hopefully attracts big gas players attention. 326m shares in issue, more likely to follow as and when they finance the 10MW or whatever thereafter - Revenues are 3+ years off being a meaningful number and profits further out again. So it can only be a T/O play - really that simple. Despite all the attendant drama.

[donkey40] 16/1/2018 16:00

Url - read my post, I said I saw the hard copy RFP document.

Sekaname - no idea on that. Why would i. Oh you think just because I post contrarian to Tlou, I have to be a Sekanamian. Well, think again I suppose.

Pretty much all I do know about Sekaname is they were awarded 270MW gas to power years back, that ended up (via many political twists and turns) as the Orapa 90MW. And since then, they have been mostly anonymous. Save that they were invited to respond to the 100MW RFP, the same one Tlou were invited to respond.

No doubt the URLs drones will now direct everyone to Panama Papers and Wikileaks and forfeited leases and other such 'drama news'. Thats as maybe, but if they had no leases, why on earth did Govt invite them to respond (oh yes, to make it appear a competitive tender prices - priceless). Some guys posted on Twitter recently that I was told are the ones who helped Sekaname submit their bid for the RFP. And they were bidding for a lot more than 'up to 10MW initially'. Sorry I can't direct you to a URL to validate all this - and I dont give a toss whether you believe me. And just becoz I can't - dont label me a liar ! I do have better things to do with my time than make up stories here just to amuse myself.

[money4me] 16/1/2018 15:40

i would be keen to hear about any concerns that are relevant. i am here to make money so if there is something to tell then please get on with it

[wheniamfree] 16/1/2018 15:16

Donkey with reference to your ties to Sekaname, can you confirm how they are progressing? That they started on their process to acquire an environmental impact approval?

[wheniamfree] 16/1/2018 15:12

Donkey three times I’ve asked now, if you wish to make a factual point and not mislead and offer more spin then please - here is your chance to give other posters some information.

Provide a url to a copy of the document you are referring to.

[someuwin] 16/1/2018 15:04

...If you've got valid points to make about the company, then make them. Ignore other posters.

[ferris_bueller] 16/1/2018 14:47

fwiw:-

Response to Government Request for Proposal Submit
Wed, 20th Sep 2017 11:30

RNS Number : 2979R
Tlou Energy Ltd
20 September 2017


Key Points

.... Ø An indicative date for receipt of a response on whether the proposal has been successful or unsuccessful is not yet known;




Only other reference I can find is in the StockTube interview
where TG says it would be nice to hear something before Xmas. (which didn't).





Any chance we can grow-up and stop the school playground bickering?

GLA

ferris

[wheniamfree] 16/1/2018 13:44

Any news on a URL to this document you have been peddling?

[am99999] 16/1/2018 13:15

What downbeat issues would you like to discuss? Perhaps you could source your 6 weeks for reply to bid as previously posted. I like to discuss the pros and cons of any share I'm in. Currently I see far more pros than cons here - that is why despite being in profit I will continue to hold - adding if we get closer to the price our bots investment fund took 6% (on behalf of a bots gov pension fund - Fact). That is my personal opinion though with all the facts that are on the table. Good luck with your investing/trading.

[donkey40] 16/1/2018 11:46

It is a constant trend when anyone dares post anything mildly downbeat about the company prospects. A certain 3 or 4 posters see to that. There is zero point posting on LSE since 1 or 2 there hold court and dictate bullish noises. They been peddling same ‘bull’ish noises since May/June last year - Bid Submission and Reserves upgrade. How can anyone be stupid enough to sell the shares - duh really, coz it doubled perhaps. Who is stupid enough to take profit. Or trade the shares.

[ernestsyngen] 16/1/2018 08:44

I see this board has degenerated

[ginko3] 15/1/2018 22:49

Guys, if you don't like each other just use the filter button, there's no need for the board to degenerate into a slag off.

[mgellie] 15/1/2018 21:38

I think it's GtP on the Hotcopper board as well. Sad life

[wheniamfree] 15/1/2018 18:55

“But hey - you decide - you think I know a little of what I am talking about re gas in Botswana or just a sh1t-stirrer.”

Having read a large portion of posts from LSE and Hot Copper, i can only interpret you know very little of what it is you are talking about and if memory serves me correctly made reference to some indirect association with Sekaname therefore your motive/agenda may be somewhat clear and perhaps why you feel the need to post on every medium you can.

As for being misunderstood and playing the victim. I have seen many posts made my yourself stated matter of factly which happened to be wrong. Whilst you may argue you did not lie and perhaps did not mean to do so intentionally an opinion should be made clear, to post in such a manner can be deemed as misleading.

Whilst I would normally give anybody the benefit of the doubt and suggest others the same, the above points leave no room to tolerate. I have seen your mannerisms before.

Perhaps if things are very easy to obtain I can hand on heart state that nobody everybody will have access to contacts within Bots such as yourself. Why don’t you image or scan the document and provide a URL so that others can verify the comment you made on the 6 weeks or, like most other things I have read you are again misleading.