We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tinopolis | LSE:TIN | London | Ordinary Share | GB0009365692 | ORD 2P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 45.50 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
28/2/2007 15:11 | The spread is large beacuse the mms dont want buyers only sellers IMHO. Where do you think the mm got all those shares the company recently bought back? They came from the mms themselves who were obliged to the fill the orders and are trying to balance their books now. Put your limit orders inside the offer and see if they will fill them is my advice. They are looking for fools like ludlow to panic sell and so am I. The fall is overdone on the back of general market weakness and the shrewd money would buy on any dips as I suspect the mms want stock. | lbo | |
28/2/2007 14:50 | Why is the spread so large.It doesn't make any sense. Spread on SBT is only .25p whilst TIN is 4p. If the spread narrows I will consider buying but until then I will watch and wait. | lyndus | |
28/2/2007 14:42 | lyndus , if you buy these you lose 12% BEFORE YOU PUT THE PHONE DOWN . | ludlow3 | |
28/2/2007 14:38 | Hope someone took my advice to buy some SBT instead.One of the few shares rising today. | lyndus | |
28/2/2007 14:32 | Scots. - there are not many punters in this one, mainly institutional, and Iam curious to figure out why it is that you are unable to recognise the value that already exists at this price, as I have said there is considerable cash sloshing around in this cos. coffers, instead of buying back shares that they have already made a rather feeble attempt at doing so, they should bloody well hand the money back to shareholders, it would be better spent and appreciated all the more. Share buybacks really have very little effect at sustaining a share price, as it generally only provides an exit for existing holders to get out at a fair price without distorting the market. | bookbroker | |
28/2/2007 14:20 | welsh says it all, good old ann, | ludlow3 | |
28/2/2007 11:42 | ludlow3 ...filtered... If we see TIN down to 30p or so as punters capitulate there will be solid value again... Good luck all! | scotswhaehae | |
28/2/2007 11:08 | its time this management went back to sheep farming.they are not very good at that .help them some one, | ludlow3 | |
28/2/2007 11:03 | down 8% jones is very good ceo. down double therest of the market, | ludlow3 | |
28/2/2007 09:13 | Yeah and Blackrock seem to agree! | robsy2 | |
28/2/2007 08:32 | This stock just gets cheaper and cheaper, all you so called risk takers, where can you buy a co. with stable earnings and one third of the value sits on cash, this valuation is just ridiculously cheap. on a two year view you are looking at single figure PER. | bookbroker | |
27/2/2007 15:01 | With £13m of cash and virtually no debt, Tinopolis is looking to spend money next year and is considering a share buyback. "I only wish companies out there were not overvalued, as there's a definite reluctance to overpay for acquisitions," Mr Jones said. "If we could negotiate the right price we would certainly be acquisitive but in the TV production sector at the moment prices are way too high. "We have to find ways of using our cash that give shareholders value, and if we can't buy then buying back shares could be an option." | igdavies | |
26/2/2007 14:43 | what as temple inland got to do with this , | ludlow3 | |
26/2/2007 14:42 | Plenty of time to make some money elsewhere before then. SBT just bouncing off the bottom. | lyndus | |
26/2/2007 14:06 | good news we will here some news in december,results , | ludlow3 | |
26/2/2007 10:09 | the ceo might as well stop at home for what good he is, | ludlow3 | |
25/2/2007 17:29 | These shares are undervalued IMHO but I have said before the city doesn't seem to have confidence yet in the company.Although the reverse takeover has been successful and the results have been good, I don't think we will see the share price move up significantly until there is more good news.But by then I suspect it will be too late to buy the shares.There is always the posibility that the company could be taken over. | lyndus | |
25/2/2007 12:09 | I think we need an update, a message of intent from the tinopolis board. Have had these shares for 12 onths now and they haven't budged much. Thought that after a consolidation period post- TV Corp buy these shares should have rocketed. Looking at the broadcastnow website and c21media, there has been no announcements or rumours for well over a month: no possible further acquisitions no talk of the buy back scheme (although this seems well on the way) no rift of commissions Looking at the other 'Super-indies' they are on the aquisitions trail. All3media in less than 5 years is worth more than £300m. RDF (another listed company) is over £100m. Shed over £50m. Tinopolis after getting a foothold in the London market should be pressing home this advantage - and investors start seeing value for thir shares. | igdavies | |
24/2/2007 10:07 | ibet i could do a better job than jones, | ludlow3 | |
22/2/2007 15:39 | Ludlow - I'll buy them off ya! How about 33p. That's fair seeing as you are deperate! | sat69 | |
22/2/2007 14:43 | just tried cant even sell 20000,over limit, | ludlow3 | |
22/2/2007 14:28 | sat 69 , thanks for your post, | ludlow3 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions