Tremor Share Discussion Threads

[holgerbb] 27/12/2023 23:24

Agree I was surprised about the bonus aporoval.
I voted against it as it was obscene in my world how much was paid out in relation to the share price.

Well guess one can see it as a good sign that Tosca and co don t mind

[tapa7] 27/12/2023 18:13

Has anyone done any polling here around how many shares on average you lot are holding? Is that allowed here?

It would be interesting to see what this community holds in total.
Is it hundreads, thousands, tens of thousands of shares?

Its thousands for me.

[ragos] 27/12/2023 14:44

It would if it is.
Knowing what we know, i just wondered if it was a transfer to their better halves! Would not surprise me.


R

[muthadrucker] 27/12/2023 14:41

Will probably mean more non execs possibly nominated by the IIs so they have more month to month influence and control. That would be a good thing

[ragos] 27/12/2023 14:22

Last year the big beasts objected but caved in this year.
Any idea what the transfer from is to?

R

[rupert57] 27/12/2023 13:15

You neglected to mention:

"To increase the maximum size of the Board of Directors to eleven directors"

so more snouts in the trough.

[tsmith2] 27/12/2023 12:29

To increase the available pools of the Company's 2017 Equity Incentive Plan and the Company's Global Share Incentive 15. Plan (2011) pigs / trough comes to mind

[gadgie2] 27/12/2023 12:14

Tractor best ignore filter really works .... I have many filtered ....

Schedule requires 80,000 to be purchased per day keep the Faith all !

[1gw] 27/12/2023 12:11

Ofer goes over 3% and becomes a "major shareholder" (again).

[tractorhead] 27/12/2023 12:00

sickthetech,

We are waiting... you weasel AI/Shill/Bot/Muppet.

Kind regards,
Most of this Board

[amt] 27/12/2023 11:47

Looks like Silk 50p target is no longer on the agenda.

[ragos] 27/12/2023 10:30

Loaf,
Don't understand what you are expecting.
You can write it yourself: All resolutions passed.


R

[takeiteasy] 27/12/2023 10:23

are the MMs ever going to let the price go a bit...

[loafofbread] 27/12/2023 10:22

AGM today.

Any chance of a positive update?

[tractorhead] 26/12/2023 20:04

Sickthetech,

bla bla bla.

"it's nice to have investment decisions proven right so conclusively by events. Read the company/sector newsflow"

Prove you are not AI or payed shill... and tell us why you are bothering to post here. You like to sing and dance about how you sold out at the top. Are you reinvested? Are you thinking of getting reinvested? Are you short? Wanting to go short?

Give us a reason to believe you are human.

Otherwise, your posting is pointless as NOBODY will read them.

Over to you. Say something human.

Happy Christmas.

[sikhthetech] 26/12/2023 19:39

wheeze

" Tremor is funding their litigation, not some opportunistic no win no fee outfit. If the legal team had held out at Nanoco, the payout could have been substantially greater."


As predicted.
I've been quoting company newsflow and posting my opinion based on those facts.
It's amazing how the outcome at Nano was as predicted.
It's amazing the newsflow here has been as predicted. I predicted the profit warnings, ad tech bubble, alphonso court case.

Nano:


Trmr:



Whilst Barky/1gw and their mates were claiming there's no ad tech bubble, there's no profit warning expected, Alphonso won't make much difference etc etc.


it's nice to have investment decisions proven right so conclusively by events. Read the company/sector newsflow

[gadgie2] 26/12/2023 11:39

a must read ...

[wheeze] 26/12/2023 09:16

Digi the salient difference here is that Tremor is funding their litigation, not some opportunistic no win no fee outfit. If the legal team had held out at Nanoco, the payout could have been substantially greater. I am sure Ofer has a number in mind - he comes across as a tough bloke.

[digitalis] 26/12/2023 08:29

Happy Christmas everyone…̷0;

Wheeze……I remember only a few months ago the magic billion number being used over at nanoco to punish Samsung for blatantly stealing their patented ideas…..Samsung could easily afford it yes…..nanoco could not afford an appeal so the share price was smashed at the small settlement figure awarded…..
Let’s not go there with tremor…….lg blatantly did a job on tremor nearly destroyed the company and a settlement will be forthcoming but it will be just enough to cover the inconvenience caused to tremor not a penny more imho……..we cannot afford to be bogged down in appeals particularly after signing off another $20mil on buybacks…̷0;lg also knows this…..another great move by the ceo….cough

Happy new yr and a steady sustained rise would do me….

[takeiteasy] 26/12/2023 07:08

Perhaps asking the same question again, but does anyone with links to the larger investors get a sense that they see the share price move is starting in any way to factor in a) positive legal outcome at all and b) that the settlement amount may be material possibly

[wheeze] 25/12/2023 20:11

In Switzerland speeding fines are punitive - proportionate to your wealth - punitive damages for a company the size of LG should start at one billion if they are to learn any sort of lesson from this case. Anything less and they will take it as a licence to infringe anyone's contractual terms.

[takeiteasy] 25/12/2023 18:55

Very clear indeed and thank you for posting. This has to start being price sensitive as the share price has factored zilch up to now for any TRMR recompense for the seemingly appalling behaviour of the other parties.

It seems incredulous to think this might go to court for reputation reasons so I presume we are at a point of scaling the damages - we have been left so broken share price wise from all this, a few tens of millions (if the scale is in this ball park at all) hardly seems to scratch the surface imvho

[velvetide] 25/12/2023 12:10

Handy plain English background on the case in the first pages here: