We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sunrise Resources Plc | LSE:SRES | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B075Z681 | ORD 0.001P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.0475 | 0.045 | 0.05 | 0.0475 | 0.0475 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 08:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Misc Nonmtl Minrls, Ex Fuels | 0 | -391k | -0.0001 | -5.00 | 2.05M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
12/8/2020 09:24 | No Sam it's not me on LSE. I presume someone else taking the hand out of you now.I'm VERY bullish. All shares intact and waiting a contract next week???! ;) | theaviator | |
11/8/2020 16:49 | The risk is zero here now. No idea why they all talking about it! | theaviator | |
11/8/2020 16:48 | Ps forget SVS. They clueless and went bust! | theaviator | |
11/8/2020 16:43 | Hi Jon,Hope you're well. Any crypto these days?I'll PM you over next few days if you can assure me it won't go on the Twitter group or LSE.Thanks | theaviator | |
11/8/2020 15:56 | You mentioned the other day that nobody understands the profit margin. The January 2019 SVS research note suggests 29-30%. Do you have reason to believe that it may be different? An final question, if you don't mind me acquiring some knowledge from you. In your experience, when is a firm of this size likely to be in the radar of institutional investors. I'm not sure the £500-£1000 purchases that are going through this week are going to move the share price that much. I think we need a big player to want to get in on the action. Your thoughts would be appreciated, jonboy | jonboycider | |
11/8/2020 15:45 | Hi Aviator, I had calculated that from year 4 onwards, profits would be £20m + per year. Do you agree? Also, why do you prefer a sale now rather than PC taking this forward. Don't the longer term revenues provide potential for a greater MCAP than the price that PC could get for a take over now. For example, would a sale now price in the value of expanded perlite? I'm note sure it would because the machinery to allow this isn't on site and won't be until phase 2. | jonboycider | |
11/8/2020 14:46 | For the few that have thumbed me down let me explain as it seems the penny hasn't dropped.Currently 6ml MCWell if Pat takes the project himself imagine profits between 10-15ml a year if you can keep your nerve. Dyor on valuation. ;)If a buyout then happy to take the price offered but it'll spike larger prior anyway :)Win Win whatever way you look at it. | theaviator | |
11/8/2020 14:41 | Ahhh looks like it's Bluehorseshoe trying to be a smart ass. A dud and a nobody. | theaviator | |
11/8/2020 13:52 | I absolutley mean it when say no shares of mine going to be sold until value comes. Not a single one!! | theaviator | |
11/8/2020 13:51 | Contracts will drop and deals galore now to come. This is only beginning | theaviator | |
11/8/2020 13:51 | Who is Sampoll on LSE? Whoever he is he is clueless. | theaviator | |
10/8/2020 13:58 | It's a relatively easy ten bagger from here really | theaviator | |
10/8/2020 13:50 | It's just the start. | theaviator | |
10/8/2020 13:10 | 5,500,000. | regandharry5 | |
08/8/2020 23:22 | Or they mean 5ml and put am extra zero by mistake!?! Which would seem to add up correctly with the other warrants. | theaviator | |
08/8/2020 23:21 | The decimal I'm wrong place lol They will have to reissue rns | theaviator | |
08/8/2020 23:17 | "a total of 5,000,0000 warrants over new Ordinary Shares, representing 0.15% of the Company's issued share capital after issue of the Fee Shares, to employees of Tertiary Minerals plc ("Tertiary") working on the Company's behalf and to a non-executive director of the Company in connection with their remuneration as follows:"This has to be a typo!! 50ml doesn't equate to .15% | theaviator | |
08/8/2020 22:58 | They really haven't a baldy on LSE re profit. Kind of puts me at a bit of an advantage I think. Think will keep it to myself too LOL | theaviator | |
07/8/2020 18:51 | Quicker than you may think though. Kirkland didn't take v long at all. | theaviator | |
07/8/2020 18:51 | Rise Sir Lancealot! Spot on! | theaviator | |
07/8/2020 18:17 | bsg. The directors will only be OK if the shares they take ilo salary are ever salable at a decent price. They will look for a complete takeover of the company in due course, as Patrick has done before. That's why he is wealthy enough not to take a salary. Might take a while but it will be worth waiting for imo. | the_beagle | |
07/8/2020 16:12 | Debt is less of a drag on share price than doubling the amount of shares in issue. Sensible borrowing for investment is a perfectly reasonable way forward when you have clearly quantifiable revenues to stem from it. The cost to extract these minerals is minimal, its sitting around on the surface. | loot2309 | |
07/8/2020 16:00 | Debt causes a long term drag on share price. The BOD will continue paying themselves in share I imagine, plus bonuses etc so they'll do OK. So will we hopefully. A JV could be the best way to go. Plus they have other projects to explore further. They'll need cash from that as well. So double seems a good estimate. | bsg | |
07/8/2020 15:49 | Any science behind that double estimate? There are many other ways of raising finance once you have a viable project and I am not sure the Directors, who have been paying themselves in shares, will chose to halve their value rather than seek a joint venture partner or raise finance once they have off take agreements. | loot2309 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions