ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

STI Stratex

0.425
0.00 (0.00%)
03 May 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Stratex LSE:STI London Ordinary Share GB00B0T29327 ORD 0.1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 0.425 0.40 0.45 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Stratex Share Discussion Threads

Showing 34901 to 34918 of 35200 messages
Chat Pages: 1408  1407  1406  1405  1404  1403  1402  1401  1400  1399  1398  1397  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
19/4/2018
09:38
"Well, this is awkward", Tim Levesey commented in the interview.
shoggoth
18/4/2018
23:28
Excellent drill results from Thani-Stratex Pandora project announced tonight, highest grade 55g/t gold, but most interesting is this statement from David Hall...........

We have received considerable interest from third parties and a number are now under NDA’s for the project. We will seek ways of maximizing the potential of the project for the benefit of all shareholders.”



Stratex owns 30% of Thani-Stratex.

tadtech
09/4/2018
10:38
New coverage and interview with CEO.


'The next 12 months are going to be very, very active’: new Stratex boss Tim Livesey on how he will turn the company around #STI




As Livesey puts it:

‘I think Stratex is greatly undervalued, particularly when you think that if some companies had a deal like the one we have with IAMGOLD, then that would be all they would need to get completely re-rated in the stock market. The low valuation can be put down to a lingering hangover from last year and is not justified. We tried to do something the shareholders didn’t like, we took that on board, we didn’t do the deal, and we have realigned back to where most shareholders wanted us to be. We are now focusing on delivering what shareholders want and need to develop some new projects, partnerships, and acquisitions. The next 12 months are going to be very, very active.’

tadtech
08/4/2018
19:04
Feels like shareholders here will take it up the a:-/$$ as usual! :-/
goldenshare888
07/4/2018
14:30
I have looked in here with only 12 days left to the AGM. The share split is OK by me - as long as there is a reasonable limitation on the pre-emptive rights if there is an (IMO inevitable) fund raising. When I reviewed the paperwork I recall seeing no change (except new CEO TL) to the directors; we have the proposed routine reappointment of CW, aged 56. After the totally unsatisfactory affairs of last Autumn I was IMO looking for greater change; other views please?Cheers, tightfist
tightfist
27/3/2018
10:38
Bending over for the next announcement.........!
goldenshare888
26/3/2018
07:51
Well, here it is. Back we go to Dalafin.
shavian
20/3/2018
08:09
I am bent over touching my toes awaiting the next thrilling instalment from our board of directors.......!

LOL

goldenshare888
17/3/2018
17:03
I suspect it's plain and simple - they need money to keep paying their wages. They'll be talk of jam tomorrow. It's nothing new, it's what these sort of outfits are there for.
steve1905
17/3/2018
16:37
There is nothing unusual about the Capital Reorganisation or the deferred shares. It happens often once the share price falls below nominal value, nothing new for AIM.

Took a look around and I see that XTR and ECR have done this fairly recently (both shares performed well afterwards) XTR rose to 3.9pp from 2p and ECR rose from .50p to 2.1p.

My bet is Stratex are looking at a transaction, they talk about this in the Annual Report, they also talk about a deal that could offer 'significant value uplift'

Looks like a chronic over reaction by the market on Friday.

observer007
17/3/2018
01:30
As a non-shareholder now, I agree, it’s not a worry, as one can wait till the dust settles to appraise the situation, but for all current shareholders it has to be deeply concerning.

Unlikely the ability to buy in the open market post dilution to maintain one’s % will provide any comfort to any current shareholders, even assuming they wish to pursue that strategy.

bo doodak
16/3/2018
16:38
Correct - the deferred shares are irrelevant. Throw them away. They have no value and make no difference to anyone.

The number of shares remains the same. The market cap remains the same.

The only difference is that the company can now raise capital at is current levels by issuing new shares. This may be dilutive, but shareholders always have the ability to buy shares in the market if they want to retain their % holding.

willo
16/3/2018
16:14
I have seen this several times before too and don't think it is a huge reason to worry.It does mean a fundraise is likely coming though and that could be horribly dilutive, but not necessarily.The problem for the company is nominal value. If the nominal value is 1p then you have to raise capital at 1p/share or above. If the market values your shares below 1p then you will find it very difficult to raise cash therefore.By splitting the current nominal share into two shares: one of a nominal value of 0.1p and one of 0.9p then you keep your nominal capital the same.The 0.1p share becomes the ordinary share and the only one that is listed and tradeable. The deferred share has no value other than to balance the books.In this way the company can in future issue new ordinary shares at a price below 1p so long as it is above the new nominal value of 0.1pI am not invested at the moment but it could become interesting if a decent corporate deal arises. I will wait until the dust settles though.
longshanks
16/3/2018
12:50
Bo Doodak
21 Dec '17 - 16:58 - 292 of 433 Edit
Ord Nominal 1p could be another debilitating factor to consider after new year

Seen this type of capital re-organisation many times prior to fund raise, hence earlier red flag comment. Best forget about realising any value from deferred shares. Dilution next.

bo doodak
16/3/2018
12:48
Cheers for the feedback.

Raising capital by placings/issuing shares is usually quite normal though, or at least very common.

What concerns me is the forward sold(and CLN style)placings and placings done at any destructive price just to keep directors in huge pay that is the biggest worry, and all that without creating any company value either.

We've seen alot of that on AIM over the last few years.

nick rubens
16/3/2018
11:51
Given the direction this is taking, perhaps they should make the ordinary shares have a nominal value of 0.01p!
longshanks
16/3/2018
11:43
Isn't this capital reorganisation proposal just some paper shuffling?
nick rubens
12/3/2018
04:30
Someone picked up 3.4m shares in one buy last week, £30,000 worth.

Looks like Stratex Dalafin project is surrounded by operating gold mines, the recent $8m JV with IAMGOLD looks more than just window dressing.

Stratex £4m m/cap is stupid - watch it grow.

observer007
Chat Pages: 1408  1407  1406  1405  1404  1403  1402  1401  1400  1399  1398  1397  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock