Stanelco Share Discussion Threads

[bulgarianpropertydoteudotcom] 14/5/2010 07:57

NO RNS AGAIN!

barnie 50/50 imo

[barniebear] 14/5/2010 07:46

Simple Q Will this c/o still be trading in 12mths time.

A Yes or No will suffice.Anyone with the technical skills care to run a "Poll"

[parsnip884] 14/5/2010 06:27

maestro

Isnt it about time you were put in a straight jacket ?

[thecrownsucks] 14/5/2010 06:18

eh hampster..time you were put down with the rest of the vermin

[thecrownsucks] 14/5/2010 06:14

is this the bottom?

[rajstar] 14/5/2010 06:13

they already have..difficult path, ambitious goal but achievable.

"i'd suggest they take a leaf out of M&S' book and choose their most commercial products"

[runnett] 13/5/2010 23:51

Hi Doctor,

If your comment, "SEO is fund raising to survive!" is a true snapshot of SEO's position, then we are in real trouble. With revenue increase and PM being upbeat, i find the comment difficult to believe. On the other hand, using a M&S model of takng on Europe a few years ago as an example, the comment is feasible.
The difference: M&S management drew back M&S growth plans in Europe to concentrate on their British interests, rebuilding their brand and profit. If you remember the share price went South then after they began closing none profit parts of trading (i.e. european stores)the profits were again realised after a few years.
We cannot compare like for like on products, but we can look at management technique protectng the company. The weakest link with SEO is management quality. I'm not blaming the management, i just think they need to be stronger and make the tough decsions when realising their growth strategy.

btw, i'm very pro SEO. The products are insightful, their operating market is ripe for the taking. I just hope management can position the company in the right direction. In a decade the promise of a profitable company had fallen short, this coupled with the changeable management has given us mmore uncertainty and vague direction. Interestingly, the RF side of SEO has long been steady - its in a very specific market and SEO are one the best in this area. Perhaps, they should look hard and long why the RF business model is solid. I wonder why they keep trying to get 'multi-stream' bio products to the market with mixed success, especially when considering they are non -profit and cash strapped. The roulette of risk isn't working, i'd suggest they take a leaf out of M&S' book and choose their most commercial products and hold the IP's in the wings or sell them on.

[rajstar] 13/5/2010 22:19

Dr J - rgds to LGB, i never held it, but it seems there was a good samaritan on the BB who took up everyone's case with a solicitor based in london "no win no fee". some recd 50-60% of their investments back via cheque. something better then nothing was the motto of this small group. GL

[thecrownsucks] 13/5/2010 22:04

why doesn't Mines comment about the fall? he did last time..is someone pulling his strings...like told him to keep stum so they can buy in cheap

[grax] 13/5/2010 21:15

DJ
Probably best I don't give my opinion on the whole sorry LGB saga.Yer man can get a bit frivolously litigious.

I think the expression 'we've all got to take a haircut here' sums up SEO pretty well.We just need to know whether it's a trendy cut or whether it's a number one all over.

[dr jekyll] 13/5/2010 19:29

Grax,

I am quite pleased that you were not in LGB for your sake but also because that means you are not who I thought you were. I sorted things out with the guy who took the court action against many posters after I had apologised. I was in the wrong but he had caused a lot of grief and concern to many investors there. All done with now and LGB shares should be coming back onto the market at some point so I may get some or even all of my money back. Your comment brought all those memories back and it was a very bad time for a lot of investors including me. Some lost their houses over it and a few were suicidal. Apart from that life is looking up apart from these SEO shares of course.

[lwaxf13] 13/5/2010 19:14

Is this the lowest this stock has ever been? If I was responsible for this disaster I would be embarassed. Not so the elite at SEO :-) Oh before anyone says the elite at SEO are not responsible for this, yes they are. They are responsible for steering the company's fortunes and should have the experience and foresight to charter it through good and bad times. Looks more like this was just a cash cow. Looking forward to the annual meeting. If nothing else it should be interesting to hear how to put a positive spin on this crock - inline with expectations. FFS if this is inline then Jeeeze .........

[eajxg19] 13/5/2010 16:50

or should I say 0.185p

[eajxg19] 13/5/2010 16:47

I pick up a few at .00185

[bulgarianpropertydoteudotcom] 13/5/2010 16:42

yes van i see what you mean although it has to be a sell at 0.18p as far as i know until now the cheapest buy has been 0.19p

crown if it gets to 0.1p its over and out mate

[thecrownsucks] 13/5/2010 16:19

SATURN BOYS WORKING HARD TODAY

[thecrownsucks] 13/5/2010 16:18

BIG BUY ORDER AT 0.1P FOR ME... 3,000,000

[vaneric] 13/5/2010 16:03

It doesn't say in the table what sort of sale that was bulg. O, AT, or something else? V.

[grax] 13/5/2010 15:55

Yep, brace yourselves folks.Looks like we might have been done up like kippers today.
Now .16 to sell.

[bulgarianpropertydoteudotcom] 13/5/2010 15:45

that 10mil sell sure worries me thats a large trade compared with the normal market size. Are the mm's working a large sell order?

Tightned my stop so probably be out again soon!

[brando69] 13/5/2010 15:37

I did apply to be Gordon Brown's fluffer, but the job - a part-time gig, Fridays only - had already been taken by some bloke called Mines.

[the_doctor] 13/5/2010 15:32

Good honest post Dr J