Sky Share Discussion Threads

[barefoot1] 25/5/2006 15:14

Hi Sky....

[energyi] 11/11/2005 10:17

Roca has its mining permit!:

[blueflame] 31/10/2005 23:02

Has anyone tried out any of the online directories that provide links to Live premiership footy on your PC? News at Ten have just told the whole country that they can get it - not sure that Sky will be happy with that.
Anyway if anyone has any trusted links and views please post them.

[energyi] 11/8/2005 23:07

not yet, I havent

[ianwc] 11/8/2005 22:38

what goes up, must come down. I wonder what happened to the fundraising? Did you hear anymore on that front today E?

[energyi] 09/8/2005 21:58

"Time Boxes" apply here



Notice that there were two big collapses as unfavorable drill results were announced. Then the share slide gradually down/sideways for over two months. What is particularly interesting is that the slide to the eventual low took almost exactly the same amount of time.

So Box 3 looks like a re-run of Box 1.

Interestingly, the rise to the high in Box 2, also required a similar time period.

Purely an accident? I dont think so

[ianwc] 09/8/2005 21:18

indeed. will be interesting to see what price they do it at now.

[energyi] 09/8/2005 21:03

No cheap financing then?
There's a gap to fill up there

[ianwc] 09/8/2005 20:56

motored today! Looks like that will mess up Cannacords plan!

[energyi] 09/8/2005 15:01

THE BULLBOARD IS SCEPTICAL

1/
SUBJECT: RE: Sky Humour Posted By: AuContraire
Post Time: 8/5/05 15:09
We will shortly see if they can go to the well one more time with this Sully story. I'll bet they can. Personally when they start talking about moving the drill around in distances like many thousands of feet, it's a bit much. More geo guess work ??

2/
SUBJECT: re-priced options! Posted By: oldgoldman
Post Time: 8/5/05 15:25
what the heck! Why would they not try another run at it! They repriced their options down to $0.10 so all the need is to get it back to .20 with volume to make some cash.
They need to spend $1 million more to get vested in the property..then they can talk about it for the next 10 years.
There are better old dogs than this around!

3/
SUBJECT: if I have it right Posted By: Iskyhigh
Post Time: 8/5/05 19:00
Essentially, they figure they drilled sd2 too far to the east. I wonder how far?
SD2 was 1.3km's NE from SD1, if i recall correctly. Now they are going to try to convince us, that the deposit is located along the fold they hit in SD1? Basically, in an area they couldn't interpretate properly in the first place.

Anyway you look at, it the deposit just got decidedly smaller, imo.


4/
SAYS: Nindge
they made a mistake in the news release:
"Mr. Ransom concludes that the central part of the Sullivan Deeps target has not been tested by drilling completed to date and that the strata and sulphides intersected in SD1 and SD2 correlate with the east edge and barren sulphide sheet to the east of the Sullivan Mine, respectively."

should read:
"...correlate with the west edge and barren sulphide sheet to the east of the Sullivan mine, respectively..."

This is similar to the dyslexia demonstrated in the news release I quoted from December interpreting the UTEM results, regarding "looking east."
Ok, so if the SD-2 drill hole was "barren" how did it provide a focus such of interest and a source of information from the standpoint of analysis?

So if they JV with another company, they essentially give a major percentage of a percentage away, why should we not invest in the JV partner instead?

4/
SUBJECT: RE: Bible Posted By: Nindge
Post Time: 8/8/05 10:32
I agree on that point of view. If they drilled northeast into the weeds that means they probably missed by a couple of hundred meters. This is based on very rough calculations drawn from the technical report, using the diagram provided on the Old Sullivan deposit.
But they will not have to repeat the excercise in the future.

So now they are proposing drilling north 1km. I am uneasy with the large stepout. Not only that, but if the deposit is lined up north-south, then they are likely to encounter the same as SD-1. We were supposed to get a technical report, but that didn't happen.

The thing that really bothers me is how they can have a private placement and that simply disappears in the next quarterly report.

[ianwc] 09/8/2005 14:02

yes seems to be the way things are heading. I am tempted to add at this price.




Fri Aug 5, 2005
Sullivan Deeps Project Review

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SKY #16-05

Vancouver, British Columbia: Stikine Gold Corporation ("Stikine" or the "Company") announces that a review and interpretation of Sullivan Deeps geology has been completed by Mr. Paul Ransom, P.Geo., a recognized expert in Sullivan mine geology.

Mr. Ransom concludes that the central part of the Sullivan Deeps target has not been tested by drilling completed to date and that the strata and sulphides intersected in SD1 and SD2 correlate with the east edge and barren sulphide sheet to the east of the Sullivan Mine, respectively. This interpretation suggests that the centre of a new system may exist primarily north and west of the holes drilled by Stikine to date and remains consistent with downhole geophysical information collected from both SD1 in late 2004 and from DDH6465 in 1996. That work demonstrates a large-scale conductor that remains 'open' to the north.

Based on Mr. Ransom's interpretation of the geology and geophysics a new target area is located approximately 1,000 m (3,280 feet) north of the SD1 site. Based on the elevation of the site and projection of the Sullivan horizon, an estimated depth to target for a proposed SD3 drill hole is 2,500m (8,200 feet).

The Company is currently reviewing its financing options including joint venture proposals for the project.


STIKINE GOLD CORPORATION

"Scott Broughton"

Scott E. Broughton, P.Eng. - President and CEO

[energyi] 09/8/2005 09:20

MOVING BACK UP

Rumour has it, they may have another go at Sullivan deeps

[energyi] 20/7/2005 18:55

not much action here...

SOME COMMENTS

1/
SUBJECT: RE: News? Posted By: Sparkletooth
Post Time: 7/19/05 16:09

There's no news because it's over...next comes the roll-back, the new financing, the new properties...it's an old story...this was a l o n g s h o t . . . . .

2/
SUBJECT: RE: Warrants Posted By: Nindge
Post Time: 7/20/05 13:39

7 million warrants probably, change the date and place an extension for another year? That would say a lot. Shareholder meeting just the day before.

[ianwc] 23/6/2005 09:13

Will be interesting to see how they are going to raise capital if they decide to drill again.

[energyi] 23/6/2005 00:00

STILL THERE??

1/
SUBJECT: e-mail from Scott Posted By: sharmouth
Post Time: 6/16/05 19:19

Got an e-mail from Scott yesterday regarding future plans. He said the consensus was that there is still compelling evidence of a deposit and they were re-evaluating their strategy for future exploration. He said news would be out soon regarding their plans. I'm not sure what soon means but the response did seem positive that they were going forward with the project :

EMAIL
Shar

We will have news sometime soon in the form of a technical report describing what our plans for Sullivan Deeps are?I believe that a compelling target remains and look forward to describing this in more geological detail soon, along with plans developed for further exploration. This takes time to interpret and report upon.

Since the wedge at SD1 is a part of the overall project it also needs to be reassessed in context with a new interpretation.

In due time?

Cheers, Scott

2/
SUBJECT: RE: GO SKY GO!!!!!!!! Canonball. Posted By: AuContraire
Post Time: 6/17/05 11:48

Re Westy .. he's O K. I really don't get offended at what he writes even though he may be wrong on some of it. I guess we all are on some things from time to time. But he's a bit naive in this stock game about thinking how hard some guys work and how ethical and honest they are. The MAJORITY DON'T AND AREN'T. Scott however does and is. The big list of executive compensation in B.C. came out to-day in the paper. In most cases their annual salary was semi normal and reasonable. Their huge scores came from bonuses and exercise of options ALL RELATED TO THE STOCK MARKET. Meaning YOU and I indirectly paid these guys. In a lot of cases the companies LOST money but the execs did quite well thank you very much. I guess Nortel was the all time classic a year or so ago. And of course the perennial loser Air Canada. But not the execs. So get off the goody-goody pious kick Westy. The game is called M O N E Y. Get real. And yes .. SKY will be extremely difficult to resurrect now. The spec bloom is off it.

[energyi] 16/5/2005 23:26

SUBJECT: RE: And yes i got filled at .11 cents Posted By: vicsmith3
Post Time: 5/16/05 16:46

You`re crazy. Dead cat bounce? Maybe if you are covering a short but the Sully Deep story is over.
Vic

2/

[energyi] 16/5/2005 16:56

looks like it.
pity.
I have plenty of wts, and a few shares left.
Had planned to dump all the shares last week- didnt quite get there

[ianwc] 16/5/2005 16:29

not really. always has been a small holding.


I am not selling. I will wait and see what they decide to do next. But Sullivan is a dead duck.

[energyi] 16/5/2005 15:58

Have you many?

[energyi] 16/5/2005 15:57

SUBJECT: Project may be dead- Not the Co. Posted By: ukboard
Post Time: 5/16/05 10:49

The project may or may not be dead.
SKY still has some cash, and a management that is alive, and able

[ianwc] 16/5/2005 10:27

Silver at $100/oz....LOL!


What would that put gold at? I can't remember the historical ratio between gold and silver.