ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

SHG Shanta Gold Limited

14.76
0.00 (0.00%)
17 May 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Shanta Gold Limited LSE:SHG London Ordinary Share GB00B0CGR828 ORD 0.01P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 14.76 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Gold Ores 114.06M -2.3M -0.0022 -67.09 155.2M
Shanta Gold Limited is listed in the Gold Ores sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker SHG. The last closing price for Shanta Gold was 14.76p. Over the last year, Shanta Gold shares have traded in a share price range of 8.70p to 14.85p.

Shanta Gold currently has 1,051,467,684 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Shanta Gold is £155.20 million. Shanta Gold has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -67.09.

Shanta Gold Share Discussion Threads

Showing 38651 to 38674 of 57750 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  1554  1553  1552  1551  1550  1549  1548  1547  1546  1545  1544  1543  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
18/11/2020
09:01
POG circa $1900 . SHG stuck at 15.25p . My frustration is what if we lose all of this bonus by under performing on production and still settling the hedge up to January then risk on comes back and POG starts falling . That happens then where does this share price go ?? If it cannot rise at this POG then I am struggling to see all the optimism . Fingers crossed 🤞🏻
kennyp52
18/11/2020
00:20
Yes, could be stagflation in the west. But they're going to have a damn good go at the green revolution. That's why it's being cast as a war, to ward off an existential threat. That'll be the source of demand - infrastructure and other "essentials" for a green economy, rather than just conspicuous consumption. Meanwhile, the rest of the world has plenty of growing still to do, and as they come up to parity the west will import inflation rather than deflation. [That'll be mitigated somewhat by deglobalisation, which will reduce efficiency but will provide jobs. And it's another kind of 'war', against cheap foreign labour and polluting shipping/transport.]
swanvesta
17/11/2020
22:18
Swanvesta, looking at past history, I'd have to agree with you. But I've a feeling we're in for a period of stagflation.

For over half a century we've seen virtually continuous year on year growth and over the last 25 years interest rates have progressively reduced to keep that growth going. I remember mortgage rate spike at 14%. Bank base rates today are near zero. They were near zero before the pandemic. The pandemic has made the economy worse, but when it's under control, the world's economy is still going to need free money to try to get demand going.

I see a 2020 decade of high unemployment and weak demand. Factories will need to adjust to that and no doubt there will be heavy investment in automation. But a factory running at less than capacity, making less stuff is going to struggle to make a profit. Globalisation supporting slick JIT supply chains with cheap Eastern labour got us to a very high state of efficiency. It's going to be difficult to restore the system let alone reduce unit costs further.

No, my bet is that helicopter money and monetising debt is going to have to ramp up but it will ultimately fail to stimulate sufficient demand. At the same time, the debt mountain will accelerate and force interest rates to remain very low.

The US Fed is already targeting more than 2% inflation, and you can bet that they will always politically understate inflation. Inflation is the only way that debt can remain sustainable.

So for me, and we can see prices rising already, we're going to see price inflation but demand deflation.

12string
17/11/2020
20:49
Juju, AIUI inflation can't happen while the economy is relatively depressed. The money printing is just keeping things going. People need to have the money and want to spend it (increased demand), or else (the opposite) there has to be a supply crunch, before inflation can kick in. At some point, perhaps after we come out of covid and govs/CBs kickstart a big green infrastructure boom, or when China decides its economy doesn't depend on western consumption any more, and/or the dollar collapses, that's when we'll see inflation.
swanvesta
17/11/2020
18:54
This article purports to answer why gold and silver have not already gone to the moon. After all, the amount of bullion needed to back the cash pouring into precious metals ETF's this year is relatively huge. So why hasn't there been a precious metals supply shortage????

Read on ...

hxxps://silverseek.com/article/return-precious-metals-leasing

... and realise that Shanta's past loan involved "hedging" 50% of their production at the gold price prevailing at the time - $1240/oz. Shanta's accounts show that the hedging was actually short selling. Every 6 months, Shanta entered into short contracts that were bound to lose shedloads of cash. This agreement was disguised as insurance against the price of gold falling, but thee banks behind it had a different purpose. Short selling puts downward pressure on gold and silver prices, and crucially enables the likes of JPMorgan to release physical gold and silver to the institutions that run the precious metals ETF's.

We should be grateful that Shanta is now virtually clear of the loan and its short selling commitment. Also, it does appear that the lid on the practice is going to blow soon. Certainly, awareness is growing.

12string
17/11/2020
18:20
Thats what everyone has been saying for the past couple of years but no sign of it
juju44
17/11/2020
18:11
At 15.5p, Shanta is tremendously good value. Do the calcs and it's obvious.
Medium to long term, there's going to be inflation ... Biden is talking $7 trillion on infrastructure and the Fed want inflation >2% at the same time as holding interest on govt bonds near to zero. The only safe havens left are precious metals.

Short term, the money is pouring into the broader equity market, that's where the growth is today, pumped up by short term trading. We are led to believe that inflation is nowhere in sight. That is going to change and IMO it won't be very long before everyone realises it.

Patience!!!

12string
17/11/2020
13:30
Kenny,

I am optimistic on SHG and Bitcoin... You keep moaning when share price going down... for me share price up or down movement is normal... I will get my price target at the end optimistically... 🚀

338
17/11/2020
11:39
chestnuts ... one thing we both agree on .... it is hugely undervalued on resources and fundamentals . POG high ; AISC nicely under control . This is my frustration - we are not getting our return in terms of share price . Maybe they need to get the message out there clearer and stronger but you are right ... inactivity on the share price is leaving this as a sitting duck . SRB are in a similar boat . POG remaining consistently high ... some gold miners shares remaining stagnant and even in reverse .
kennyp52
17/11/2020
11:37
So this can mean only one thing..
its top up time
17/11/2020
11:24
Pardon ? Sorry I got it wrong more like . Even Astra Zeneca "at cost" will included their overheads and likely normal profit margin . But £3 a shot is substantially different from $19.50 for a product that costs a fortune to transport and keep in liquid nitrogen ! Pfizer's product is rapidly becoming the lesser of the options - no wonder they announced is as quickly as they could .
kennyp52
17/11/2020
11:08
Pardon Kenny


Oxford/AstraZeneca are the ones working at cost - £3 a shot apparently.

chestnuts
17/11/2020
11:06
Shanta Presentation by Erichttps://youtu.be/Ky6UpVvbBvY
c9ajl
17/11/2020
10:50
Apparently Moderna and Pfizer will be selling their vaccines at a profit, and Moderna's will be even more expensive than Pfizer's $19.50. Oxford/AstraZeneca are the ones working at cost - £3 a shot apparently.
swanvesta
17/11/2020
09:11
At cost .. that really shows your naivety chestnuts .

338 - sorry to disappoint but if you follow my posts you will know I took out most of my CEY months ago ... still got a very badly performing lump you will be pleased to know ... but I put it into here ; SLP ; GRL and got a huge holding in JLP with a 3.84p average . CEY will recover . The question is will SHG ever go anywhere? You must be under water here the way you respond to anything which is not a ramp ?

kennyp52
16/11/2020
20:39
Hmm ok. US Gov paid Pfizer (or are contracted to pay) $1.95bn for 100m doses. That's $19.50 a shot, and they're looking to manufacture a billion or two. Seems high BWDIK.
swanvesta
16/11/2020
19:30
swan

Pfizer were doing the vaccine at cost so i am lead to believe, i am sure i have read this somwhere

chestnuts
16/11/2020
19:00
"If Pfizer vaccine was the only one to be successful, they would have passed the formula to other producers to manufacture and the capacity could have been increased"

I don't think that's how capitalism works.

swanvesta
16/11/2020
18:15
Trump would have walked the election if it had not been for Covid and if he had not shot himself in the foot telling his followers to ignore postal votes .
Biden will last 6 months and then socialist Kamala will oversee the end game for US power and wealth

juju44
16/11/2020
17:25
I will also add for Boris to raise taxes at this point is totally the wrong way to do things, taxes shouldnt be raised until inflation is rising and the debt is going down.
chestnuts
16/11/2020
17:23
Jc2706

38497 very funny.

I showed my misses and she cant wait to give me some.

Todays action on gold is bullish and giving every one a vaccine wont cure the debt.

chestnuts
16/11/2020
16:32
If Pfizer vaccine was the only one to be successful, they would have passed the formula to other producers to manufacture and the capacity could have been increased
chestnuts
16/11/2020
16:27
Agreed. The distribution of these vaccines is going to be a major logistical effort. But I suppose that world domination through vaccine implanted control chips is a goal worth striving for. :-)
jc2706
16/11/2020
15:53
Actually one vaccine is not enough. They need several billion doses, much more than any one manufacturer can supply in the timescale demanded.
swanvesta
Chat Pages: Latest  1554  1553  1552  1551  1550  1549  1548  1547  1546  1545  1544  1543  Older