Serabi Gold Share Discussion Threads

[borisjohnsonshair] 22/12/2020 13:43

Yes, heading to a higher high.

[tightfist] 22/12/2020 13:35

Good to also see a potential "higher low".

[borisjohnsonshair] 22/12/2020 11:46

It's a buy signal. Period of stagnation followed by break up. This will rise 300-500% in 2021.

[tightfist] 22/12/2020 11:22

Nice to see the Offer being raised. It would be great to see the close above 91p on decent volume...... Let's see!

[borisjohnsonshair] 22/12/2020 11:09

Chart is 120p bound over next 30 days.

[trader536] 21/12/2020 16:05

Woof woof 🐕

[borisjohnsonshair] 21/12/2020 12:34

Gold will rally the most after the crisis, just like in 2009. It doesn't rally as other assets drop.

[tiger60] 21/12/2020 10:19

Well that rally in the gold price did not last long. I thought with the US stimulus news and Brexit uncertainty it would be a given that it would rise today.

Interesting debates about whether Bitcoin is the new gold going on.

[stan72] 21/12/2020 08:45

Why 8th May?

[tiger60] 21/12/2020 08:41

This should be a blue day but been pretty static over the last week. Come on give us something to cheer. Gold back up to 1900

[borisjohnsonshair] 20/12/2020 09:18

Nice chart ending 2020 heading for the transformational year for SRB. Merry Xmas all (but one).

[borisjohnsonshair] 17/12/2020 18:19

Yes but not in this context - their cost is included.

[tiger60] 17/12/2020 18:05

renumeration and salaries are different

[swanvesta] 17/12/2020 16:56

AISC generally includes G & A, which includes salaries. Directors are employed by the company, their salaries are included. Share-based payments are a different matter, but they don't cost the company anything.

[borisjohnsonshair] 17/12/2020 13:43

Are you sure the non executive director salaries aren't included. Dividends wouldn't be as they've be from profits, but non were paid.

[tiger60] 17/12/2020 13:01

AISC does not include directors renumeration.

‘Share price doubled’ - equally you can say stood still since sept 2019 or down 30% from peak. Performance has been poor set against peers

[borisjohnsonshair] 17/12/2020 10:50

Pointless these discussion boards as you get idiots and people just out to be offensive. Overall the discussion becomes pointless

[borisjohnsonshair] 17/12/2020 10:29

He's doesn't understand that AISC, profit and cash in the bank are all after they've been paid. So debt paid off, cash reserve risen, share price doubled and directors salaries paid - awesome plans for 2021 yet he still says what's the plan and why they paid. Doesn't sound like he's ever been a leader.

[tiger60] 17/12/2020 10:12

I think that is unfair. The salary levels of the directors are one component of many that make up an investment decision. You may see the macro situation of gold coupled with the exploration potential of SRB as massive plus points but equally one can still express that the salary levels seem to be excessive.

From memory $1.17 m in director salaries (not counting options)for 2019 is pretty generous for a company that has failed to meet its forward statements over a number of years. Would be nice to see performance based rewards and some director buys!

[cotton4] 17/12/2020 10:02

I don't know what Sherry's problem is with the directors salaries. They are known to anyone who wants to invest in SRB. If you think they are to high, don't invest - simple.