We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scancell Holdings Plc | LSE:SCLP | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B63D3314 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 9.10 | 8.70 | 9.50 | 9.10 | 8.86 | 9.10 | 537,268 | 10:13:34 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharmaceutical Preparations | 5.27M | -11.94M | -0.0129 | -7.02 | 83.97M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
13/8/2017 12:32 | Now lets say Scancell achieved approval for the Combo ... not sure exactly how this would work, but the data set for Mono SCib1 could allow it to be used in the adjuvant setting Why might an approved drug be used for an unapproved use? From the FDA perspective, once the FDA approves a drug, healthcare providers generally may prescribe the drug for an unapproved use when they judge that it is medically appropriate for their patient. You may be asking yourself why your healthcare provider would want to prescribe a drug to treat a disease or medical condition that the drug is not approved for. One reason is that there might not be an approved drug to treat your disease or medical condition. Another is that you may have tried all approved treatments without seeing any benefits. In situations like these, you and your healthcare provider may talk about using an approved drug for an unapproved use to treat your disease or medical condition. | inanaco | |
13/8/2017 12:24 | Because PD1 approvals are still limited ... ie the majority are still going through primary trials as a mono, the competition is still in its infancy, and the chosen partner Drug can only be from the approved list unless you can get an arrangement with a phase 2 asset. | inanaco | |
13/8/2017 12:17 | Wigwammer Its actually easy to value, the issue is finding the right partner that has a slot open to expand it .. Don't forget Big Pharma is running hundreds of trials in PD1 with so many vaccine failures they may consider it a low priority at this stage, because so many combo's are still in trial. So if you want to get noticed ... you run your own Combo trial .. | inanaco | |
13/8/2017 12:08 | Bang on, bs.It's an early stage biotech. It is hard to value. Sentiment is key to valuation.I watch the growing despondency and disarray with great interest. | wigwammer | |
13/8/2017 12:05 | IMHO Scancell cannot be forced into administration its has no liabilities with that sort of power, worst case, scancell put itself up for sale using the normal market method with the share price as the basis of the sale rather than the IP which would then get valued by any bidders. hxxp://citywire.co.u | inanaco | |
13/8/2017 11:55 | Terror, 1)Would be good if you could answer my 10198 2)I can understand many of the posts on here re. funding, frustration with RG etc. etc. Less understandable from those who aren't invested but what I just can't fathom out is a deliberate attempt to scaremonger and cause panic, especially given the field the Company are operating in. Why on earth would you make this statement?:- "The worst case scenario is possible with funding impossible to raise, leaving PIs with worthless shares." Take a look at Redx Pharma - forced into administration and so forced to sell off a PRECLINICAL asset at fire sale prices for $40m. So that's preclinical for one candidate. Are you seriously suggesting that two platform technologies have no value whatsoever? If you're going to put so much time and energy bashing a stock you don't even hold then at least make it a bit more realistic. | bermudashorts | |
13/8/2017 11:26 | Scabcell investors face heavy dilution from the next wave of fund raising to support the clinical trials. The worst case scenario is possible with funding impossible to raise, leaving PIs with worthless shares. These are the significant risks facing PIs as they grapple with huge losses. Averaging down and looking for short term bounces is a mugs game. Yes, there might be the odd 10% here and there but the timing is too difficult to get right. The downward spiral will continue, this was not caused by Helium but by Goodfellow failing to have a strategy, promising a sale or deal and delivering nothing. That is the real reason for the share price decline. It looks like Chips has been unable to deliver anything substantial from America. The company has increased its cost base and generated no added value. Scancell needs to deliver value, Goodfellow looks incapable of doing that. | terror | |
12/8/2017 21:53 | The 'desert wanderers' from LSd,the original home of BUY, BUY, BUY trHYPE, who, by twisting and blaming everyone ELSE for THEIR repeatedly being PROVEN to be WRONG... share the 'knack', as will now surely be 'evidenced again here... of turning losses into LOSSES | the real lozan | |
12/8/2017 21:24 | Hi Gaz, didn"t know that, wasn"t around in them days. Was rather hoping my posts suggested I was in much better spirits since Thursday for sure. Been invited on to a few Twitter groups, even starting maybe a new one, so just here in transit, perhaps just time to move on completely, got enough challenges going on to write a book!!!! Don"t believe for a second that Helium took our share price to 10p. Their disposals helped trigger a recovery to 12.75 IMHO. the problem for me is simply once we reached there, there was no further news to keep the momentum going, and a serious lack of PI buying or further ii buys to sustain it. I will say this just once, the reason I left LSE had been coming for a few months, just made easy by a one day ban which angered me. Think some here might have noticed the posts by inanaco, Torquay Fan, and oldnotwise to me in recent times, and the amazing coincidence that every time I posted one or the other would post and twist, question my integrity, honesty, knowing full well that being housebound it was an avenue of pleasure and many friendships i could participate in. No such problems here, those items have been condemned like a broken record for four long years!!!! Just wish inanaco would 8ugger off, and concentrate on rebuilding any reputation he has left. Some chance eh lol. I notice The REAL Lozan has posted, always knew what the original was like, just a shame we have another troll claiming to be the REAL one. Maybe I will just hang around till the AGM, somehow I think the BOD will reveal the news we need, or the share will probably collapse even more than it has. Not selling now or even buying, just think all is not lost yet, at least eight people and their families have the gift of life for five years or more, more to join them. Is that worth more than 10p..........leave that to each person to decide. Take care buddy, good to have contact again ATB | chelsea34 | |
12/8/2017 20:30 | Anyway i am sure the world loves to wake up loz to your Drama, you have been posting a repeat every day for 4 years .... Loz breakfast TV ... viewers .. none however one day it closed, he went by plane to the airport and then a train to Nottingham central when a hotel at the Airport actually held the AGM and loz, you have stated exactly as i have posted on ii including your trading of scancell to recover your loss so you only purchased at high points in the market Only ""tosh"" was capable of buying at 6p when the share was on the Plus markets at 60p odd .... prior to the 10/1 split some sort of "God trade intervention" Now we see another "God trade" at 444p ... or is this the booze causing cloudy judgement s for the "bail Price" you actually have the man on this bb that counted them out c7 suggest you read his history ....... anyway keep up the good work, your part of Scancell heritage now | inanaco | |
12/8/2017 19:57 | Loz to remind you of the helium holding RNS which was prior to the selling of another 5 million in the last few months. | inanaco | |
12/8/2017 19:55 | Loz with two left feet, who only ever averaged down ........ | inanaco | |
12/8/2017 19:54 | Another point that was raised Now you could say that the SCib1 batch going a bit stale could be a blunder, but it was the first batch ever manufactured, and Scancell would have had to have known a year before it went stale to re order to maintain continuity as its taken 13 months from order to delivery. | inanaco | |
12/8/2017 19:48 | There is now to be a 'drama tic' increase here in BILGEWATER - For starters, or rather, btandard 'practice' = "The obsession with the share price level being low is the fault of Scancell ? when it was caused by helium selling into low liquidity" TOTAL PONY REALITY = The S P had already SLUMPED long before Helium 'jumped ship' . . As posters 'wash-up' here, to join other trHYPE infestors... expect to see the change from losses into LOSSES | the real lozan | |
12/8/2017 19:23 | """post ridiculous claims of 'minted', '£1 on cards', 'no risk' etc."" Just remember Scancell was a one trick pony back them ..........a lot has changed which has been ignored by the market, indeed major movements have been done by institutions rather than Pi .. for commercial reasons rather than ""risky science"" based selling. Calculus sold at investor day quite big blocks and as you well know so did helium But later Calculus took another bite and bought way more DUH !!! .... your claims never make the press !! mine do and Nobody has ever claimed they are big trials ... Scancell, has reached gold-standard survival with its CD8-activating vaccine """"" hxxp://labiotech.eu/ The obsession with the share price level being low is the fault of Scancell ? when it was caused by helium selling into low liquidity, so rather than seeing it as an problem look at it as an opportunity The only move you could attribute to bad management was 25p to 19p approx, the chairman change over. | inanaco | |
12/8/2017 18:30 | Terror I have to agree with what you have said (for a change). Sometimes it is not what is said but the way it is said that is objectionable. In my opinion there has only been one poster making ridiculous (and potentially dangerous) claims and these have drawn in support from people genuinely wanting it to be true. So save your attacks for the instigator and ringleader. | gazza | |
12/8/2017 17:51 | Bans, suspensions, whatever. The main lesson for you guys is to accept different opinions and consider these opinions before you post ridiculous claims of 'minted', '£1 on cards', 'no risk' etc. There are a number of people here who got the risks of funding, trial numbers, lack of commercial quality and yet you never listened. The posters predicting a share price lower and lower were spot on. The posters saying the poor commercial strategy, or lack of one, under Goodfellow, were spot on. There is room on a board for all opinions, it generally is healthier as a result. The MFF turned into a rabble of personal agenda where the individual was more important than the PI's. They operated on the idea that life is first and foremost about being right, even when “right” requires a good deal of “spinning of the facts” to make them “right.” Spiteful and vindictive people were passing judgment and hounding for bans even when they had no moral reason to do so. And now some are back together, facing the accusers and adversaries. In my line of work, the top advice is, be friendly to your colleagues, peers and bosses because you never know when things will change. | terror | |
12/8/2017 17:39 | Hi Gazza, absolutely correct. Never had understood why a BB cannot be that way. Never did feel comfortable posting to usernames, for me i prefered to know those i admired and met and still am in touch with many. Kreature, grateful eternally for the massive support afforded to me, when i really needed it. No need for lying I hold 90k at an average of just under 26p, according to my account i am 60% down. Complete transparency with me, can understand those who feel happier not declaring, but cannot bear the lies of false declaration. A very good post by moonparty this morning on the LSE BB................ ...in an astra zeneca article. Article was in June, just in case nobody posted this already: Indeed Scancell are mentioned........... | chelsea34 | |
12/8/2017 13:03 | not that it matters but this play on words .. I think the word is suspension not ban .... which i did say in my earlier post it had been reviewed .... for your suspension i used "assumed" a ban because your premium listing had gone. | inanaco | |
12/8/2017 11:16 | Possibly friendship, camaraderie, social interaction - there's more to life than an share price | gazza | |
12/8/2017 10:01 | What are you grateful for ? The shares have collapsed from 60p to 10p whilst you have been relentlessly cheering the company on. Is your average still 33p ? ATB | kreature |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions