Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[miavoce] 14/10/2017 16:34

Hence why I don't post very often....

[agema] 14/10/2017 14:56

miavoce

Of course RG is hoping that any deal for funding can be completed at a similar time to the Moditope patent granting.Because if this timetable is not met. Then the programme falls behind schedule.

[miavoce] 14/10/2017 12:11

Hi Bermuda

I've been invested here since the backend of last year but haven't posted much due to the previously fractious nature of the board - things now seem to be gradually improving in that regard.

I feel very lucky to have come across Scancell at such a low ebb in its share price and at what appears to be a pivotal period in its development - I have managed to acquire a good sized holding at, IMO, a very low cost when compared to the potential. I guess I've got RG's shortcomings on the commercial front to thank for that (every cloud....).

I was initially drawn to Scancell by the potential of Immunobody, which of itself seems to be a valuable platform, but it looks like Moditope may well eclipse that in the not too distant future if its effectiveness in mice is matched in humans.

The company are clearly becoming very excited Moditope as its potential is further uncovered by Lindy and her team - the secrecy and the focus on maximising the patent coverage certainly gives the impression that there is something really worth protecting here.

[bermudashorts] 14/10/2017 11:52

Miavoce, good to see you posting here.

There is certainly a huge amount of work going into protecting the platform. Was interesting to see that one of the divisional applications covers the T Cell receptor. Think this is highly likely to be driven by protecting the tech. from others working on adoptive cell transfer therapies rather than any intention from Scancell to go down that route.

[miavoce] 14/10/2017 11:24

From what RG said at the AGM it sounds to me like the granting of the Moditope Patent and the signing of the Moditope 'deal' are tied together and that once the patent is granted the deal will be completed.

My reason for thinking this is that RG referred to his expectation that the patent will be granted late this year / early next year, and he also indicated that he hoped funding would become available late this year early next year so that the new CEO would have the funds available to spend. This seems to strongly imply that the granting of the patent is the remaining hurdle before the funding deal is completed.

It would certainly be nice to see a patent announcement followed shortly afterwards by a deal announcement.

[chelsea35] 14/10/2017 10:33

agema lol. As it goes events over the last few months even leave that option closed. Yeah this is to do with my criticisms of Inanaco, which I trust have been aired and no further need to discuss further. I have been very surprised at the level of criticism afforded me by TF and dstanley. TBH I much care. Glad it has been entertaining though, lol.

[agema] 14/10/2017 10:14

You guys used to be such good friends. Now look at you both. ( sniff, sniff ).

Oh please make up.

If not, why not go on Jeremy Kyle. To sort out your differences.?

[chelsea35] 14/10/2017 08:38

Torquay Fan, glad you have me back on filter, as you have stated numerous times in the past. The truth of the matter is you despised the manner in which i dealt with my issues with inanaco back in those times.

As i have said many times, you see yourself as some sort of referee, the voice of reason, you are neither. Your opinions are better served voicing your own rather than attempting to discredit the worthy opinions of others.

For three years we were in regular contact, twice you visited me at home during my long illness and were privy to all my medical records, I would rather remember you for that than what has occurred in the past few months. Take Care,

[torquayfan] 14/10/2017 01:02

Agema the point made originally (as in 12003) was IMO an important one. NOT that I believe there was any real truth in what was implied - more a case of 'puffing up' by the poster I would say. But it was a compromising line to play with.
My point should have been quietly accepted. But it wasn't !

Anyway, the filter is on here - so the Show's over !

Wanderer - as I said - just 'puffing up'.

ATB

[wanderer1210_0] 13/10/2017 20:19

C7 not my scene to report things, life's too short to run and tell tales.

[chelsea35] 13/10/2017 17:37

smiler, do report it, perhaps they will call in Thai Mental Health Authority.

[wanderer1210_0] 13/10/2017 16:36

Bloody hell, hope the FCA are not reading this as people could find themselves in very hot water

[agema] 13/10/2017 14:14

TF

No m8. The natives have not been frightened. They are just enjoying the row.

[torquayfan] 13/10/2017 11:09

Just the truth C7. That's all.
Move on. No need to reply on here as I'll put the filter on now because this is just silly. AND we've frightened the natives away !

Calm down and wish you a nice day

[chelsea35] 13/10/2017 09:49

What a load of 8ollocks!!!! Completely twisted what i said to you in a private e-mail. What gain from you could i have got??

Indeed forget it, so you took what i said in a private e-mail and splashed it all over the BB. Revolting.

[chelsea35] 13/10/2017 06:40

Move on!!!! I have ignored you since the worst of your posts months ago. All week you have been at me for supporting Balernos post about time for a new CEO. And that without ever having posted a bad word about him. That was my opinion which you chose to attack and which the very next day actually happened. Still you continued. Your behaviour is that of a very angry man, wasn"t me that started it just your sick accusations that i manipulated the BB to my illness which is even worse and deteriating every day. That support kept me going through very dark times. All because i spoke out against inanaco and challenged a few issues. You even followed me here, and now with your reputation in tatters on LSE you come crawling on here. Get a life and yes move on, just know i want no part in it.

[torquayfan] 12/10/2017 03:43

Timbo thank you very much for those comments.
Much appreciated as always. More please.

And Lozan - I never thought I'd put a thumbs up on one of your posts again. But your 11998 - I just did.

But please could you not call the LSE Forum the M F F F ?

[gazza] 11/10/2017 22:41

As always many thanks for taking the time and trouble to post Timbo

[10acious] 11/10/2017 19:59

Timbo, thank you for the input. Interesting questions and responses.Even though Primary Bid have only been around for a short time I'm surprised that switched on professionals running an AIM listed company in need of capital were unaware of their potential.But then again, this is Scancell.Thanks again, much appreciated.

[chelsea35] 11/10/2017 17:43

Lozan, well the BOD have been criticised for not ""talking up the share"". What you are saying is a fact and useful if you are not trading the share. I think they couldn"t have been clearer and it was hardly vague. Doubt whether you have even listened to the AGM to be honest, respect to Tosh for changing his view a bit after doing so. Very happy with my 12.39 TBH

Fancy dropping the name "elsie" for a bit?? you sound like a bitter Ugly Sister.

[agema] 11/10/2017 17:34

Interesting. Thanks Timbo.

Very interesting that the Board asked for details about the primary bid placing procedure.

Does that indicate to us that a further placing is not too far away.? The Board were certainly interested in it. Why.?