ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

SBRY Sainsbury (j) Plc

261.80
2.20 (0.85%)
03 Dec 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Sainsbury (j) Plc LSE:SBRY London Ordinary Share GB00B019KW72 ORD 28 4/7P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  2.20 0.85% 261.80 261.60 261.80 262.80 259.60 260.00 5,801,730 16:29:52
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Grocery Stores 32.7B 137M 0.0580 45.14 6.13B
Sainsbury (j) Plc is listed in the Grocery Stores sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker SBRY. The last closing price for Sainsbury (j) was 259.60p. Over the last year, Sainsbury (j) shares have traded in a share price range of 237.80p to 310.60p.

Sainsbury (j) currently has 2,360,471,449 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Sainsbury (j) is £6.13 billion. Sainsbury (j) has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 45.14.

Sainsbury (j) Share Discussion Threads

Showing 21776 to 21797 of 24400 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  880  879  878  877  876  875  874  873  872  871  870  869  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
26/1/2021
09:19
A lot of the large retailers up today - including Tesco.
So nice to see Sainsburys doing OK too.

netcurtains
26/1/2021
08:05
£2.50 open.
Looks good so far.

netcurtains
25/1/2021
21:31
They've only lost 72% of their original capital outlay

slightly less because of dividends though


but there has been share dilution since then

so 72% down, is probably not far off


money down the drain

spob
25/1/2021
21:27
roughly 874p

ROFLMAO

spob
25/1/2021
20:41
even worse than that

what's 600p in todays money ?

spob
25/1/2021
20:30
Any deal of Sainsbury's, if one was ever to materialise will need the approval of the QIA as the Qatari's own c23% of Sainsbury's which they paid c600p per share for.
loganair
25/1/2021
18:03
Poikka: yes the last thing we want is it to be taken over by BooHoo and instead of getting real baked beans in a real shop we just get silly teenage photos of beans on the internet.
netcurtains
25/1/2021
16:58
But then Sainsbury's margin is much lower than Tesco's. That does, however, leave plenty of room for improvement, hence the bid speculation, I guess.

Just hope that it stays independent.

poikka
25/1/2021
14:19
Sainsburys I think is trading below its NAV value.
So that is quite a safety net for nervous investors.

netcurtains
25/1/2021
13:16
I Think the market is deciding that Sainsburys has RELATIVE value in that its market cap is only about 1/4 of Tesco.
ARGOS is quite a winner too.

netcurtains
24/1/2021
22:30
Could it be solved, or at least lessened, by removing business rates but increasing vat?
pete160
24/1/2021
20:11
Amazon is a direct competitor to Argos/Sainsbury's.They pay no business rates and are at an advantageous position,and as such there is then no level playing field.It is high time that a tax is imposed on American digital tech companies that operate in the UK to restore equilibrium.The high profits earned here are ample justification for this move to take place.
imperial3
24/1/2021
17:07
Looking at the chart, there's a lot of interest being shown in it. There's 8.6% shorted atm.
poikka
24/1/2021
15:28
Article in today's Telegraph;

"Hedge funds buy up Sainsbury’s debt swaps on takeover hopes.

Hedge funds are ramping up bets that Sainsbury’s will be the next British grocer to be snapped up in a debt-fuelled takeover ...."

pdt
21/1/2021
17:00
So SBRY is the new British Airways Avios Partner
knowing
20/1/2021
08:22
Food deflation
muffinhead
18/1/2021
09:25
Very difficult for politicians to go against WHO advice - and live to fight another day.

For me, on balance, I think that they're counter productive: they give people a false sense of security, leading to carelessness; they could possibly create a transfer from mask to hands of the virus, and they could lead to wearers ignoring the more important hand-washing measures.

Better, perhaps, if we were implored to cough/sneeze into a tissue, and then gel our hands, and avoid doing so near others.

Of course, a lot depend on what type of mask you're wearing, and I can't recall the last time someone coughed or sneezed near me - in a confined space.

But that's for another day. In the meantime, I'd like to thank our government for their very proactive approach to vaccination.

poikka
18/1/2021
07:53
Pierre Oreilly: I think the problem is that masks amongst some people have become political and thus its difficult for those people to be rational.
netcurtains
17/1/2021
22:13
Oh well, I doubt the following will sway any minds but I'll post it anyway.

Oxford researchers don't seem to think a beneficial mask wearing effect is 'bloody obvious'

From the university of oxford's centre for evidence based medicine ..

In 2010, at the end of the last influenza pandemic, there were six published randomised controlled trials with 4,147 participants focusing on the benefits of different types of masks. 2 Two were done in healthcare workers and four in family or student clusters. The face mask trials for influenza-like illness (ILI) reported poor compliance, rarely reported harms and revealed the pressing need for future trials.

Despite the clear requirement to carry out further large, pragmatic trials a decade later, only six had been published: five in healthcare workers and one in pilgrims. 3 This recent crop of trials added 9,112 participants to the total randomised denominator of 13,259 and showed that masks alone have no significant effect in interrupting the spread of ILI or influenza in the general population, nor in healthcare workers.

...........

I don't know whether or not masks are effective, but i do know various experts have varying views and the current scientific literature is inconclusive.

pierre oreilly
17/1/2021
19:32
Masks do make a huge diffrence but only if everyone wears them.

Every time you breath out or talk, vapour droplets containing the virus are expelled (if you have the virus of course)


Those droplets travel much much further without a mask barrier in place

and thus have a greater potential to infect others


it's not rocket science

it's bloody obvious


So given the NHS is overwhelmed and even if a mask only cuts down the transmission rate by say 50%, then it is obviously well worth it


After the NHS becomes overwhelmed the number of deaths from other causes will far exceed the number of deaths from this virus

this is because people can't get treatment for those other potential causes of death

there aren't enough ambulances, there aren't enough hospital beds and there aren't enough doctors and nurses to deal with patients. Remember that Nightingale hospital. It's mostly empty because we do not have the extra staff to operate it.

and some people ignore symptoms because they think the NHS is too busy = more deaths etc etc


you think 1500 uk deaths per day is a lot

trust me that will be nothing compared to the numbers of deaths when the NHS stops functioning.

spob
17/1/2021
12:31
"I would add if you are not convinced by the science (like me)"

"i'm not sure i'm helping prevent the spread"


The government and medical profession is really trying to help.

Asian societies have very low cases of Covid-19... they accept government advice and wear facemasks without question. Western societies are learning the hard way!


Hands Face Space

muffinhead
15/1/2021
19:40
In some respects masks help prevent the spread, in other respects (as net indicated) they help aid the spread of the disease.

Boris today, on advice, emphasised that transmission is also by surface contact.

Some experts come down to the view that on balance it's better that masks are worn, others that they are not worn. I think all agree that if worn correctly - not touched, disposed after a couple of hours, correctly fitting - then masks are better than no masks. But we live in the real world where people wear them for weeks, touch them, don't wear them properly.

I'll wear one when required, but i'm not sure i'm helping prevent the spread. Not sure I'm arguing like a belligerant child - just listening to the broad view of the experts.

pierre oreilly
Chat Pages: Latest  880  879  878  877  876  875  874  873  872  871  870  869  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock