Rhythmone Share Discussion Threads

[shroder] 10/8/2017 18:45

Barky, it was a genuine question based on one or two posters comments that I had spoken to recently, WINS seems to be particularly active at the moment (perhaps working a buy order) hence the post.

Really hope we get a TR1 soon, very aggressive market making by any standards imo.

[jarvis4] 10/8/2017 18:31

Out of 1.1m trades 480,000 were OK trades ie ordinary trades where publication is delayed by request. Now what should we read into that I wonder?

[loafofbread] 10/8/2017 17:34

The new Influencer Marketing Guide looks good. (twitter)

Obviously doing something right!

[1gw] 10/8/2017 17:14

Funny, I thought I was offering an olive branch there STT. I wasn't attacking you, just as LCWA comments.

I was pointing out (to polythene) that posters who are unable to devote the time that you do to research and who know how you like to repeat points once you think you have a winning argument and winning spin might feel a bit intimidated at the thought of engaging you in debate. This is what they would effectively be doing if they came forward with an argument as to why R1 had the right approach - because they know you read the thread and would respond on your own thread. I was offering this as an interpretation (to polythene, who was asking the question) of why some posters on the other thread might not relish starting a debate over there.

I was then saying that I thought it was a valid point that you were raising - this question of whether to focus on part of the chain or try to span it. If there was a mild dig at you in there it was in the use of the phrase "in this particular case", implying as I was that in many cases I don't believe the points you raise are really quite so relevant as this one to R1 investors.

[wheeze] 10/8/2017 17:11

Evens it is.

[alex1621] 10/8/2017 16:15

I reckon your main "scaffolder" contact, Kim Jung Un, will determine how the market will close.

[geheimnis2] 10/8/2017 16:00

^ what a waste of space!

[leluot3] 10/8/2017 15:56

any iews to share on the share price Barkpooooooooooo?

like how come 240p looks more like 32p?!!

[barkboo] 10/8/2017 15:41

A tester yeh? - rap up warm and buy a rubber dinghy! lol

No views to share on market makers - all gangsters!

[football] 10/8/2017 15:39

1gw you can't have a discussion with someone that only ask's questions and never replies to one you ask a part from a question and keeps a database full of irrelevant posts about stuff that happened years ago and is not relevant to what's happening with the company and the market it's in now. It's no good looking back to how the business was run years ago when basically we are a new start-up company I have nothing in common with the previous one apart from offices and some staff.

The company is evolved but we keep on having the same argument about things that happened to the previous incarnation

[sikhthetech] 10/8/2017 15:15

gl was right...

gowlane - 02 Aug 2017 - 23:40:03 - 4719 of 4766 RHYTHMONE - new Name, new Beginning??? - RTHM
Never saw any convincing analysis on any of the boards unfortunately, yet PIs fall deeply in love with this stock all the time. In fact the more research they do the worse it gets.

The boards then becomes a forum where like minded investors reinforce each others convictions and any dissident voices are drowned out

forget the cheerleading, this is AIM, a healthy scepticism is your only man

[lance corporal winstanley ash] 10/8/2017 15:07

But its not a personal attack. Its an observation. He's commenting on what you do.

[sikhthetech] 10/8/2017 14:57

lcwa, his 1st paragraph is a personal attack... No need for the 1st paragraph, was there?

This is a discussion board, people ask questions, post opinions, observations and speculation... the 'ask the bod' is a get out clause for not wanting to discuss it...

[lance corporal winstanley ash] 10/8/2017 14:50

Where is there a personal attack in 1gw's post, Sikh? He's made a fair observation and gone on to say you may even have relevant points but unfortunately as you probably know they are unanswerable unless you contact the company. Much like most of your negative articles it's good for thought but all negative rhetoric. And you turned round and called him naive bla bla bla. Rather ironic really.

[shroder] 10/8/2017 14:36

Barky, any thoughts on Winterfloods?

[stocky] 10/8/2017 14:26

I think Full racks are sometimes better than bottoms, but not always better than tops. Depends on the country really.

[shroder] 10/8/2017 14:25

It can be answered at least in part as the issue has existed for sometime.

R1's strategy so far has been to promote third part platforms such as Trade Desk, media math whilst offering their own when and if needed, however from what I can gather it is not the first option.



Don't forget also that R1's primary business is now an exchange, this imo dilutes to some degree those companies offering a a single point solution as their core product.

[barkboo] 10/8/2017 14:15

Gordon - at this stage, a rhetorical question that cannot be answered.....debate all you want!

Johnny Boy loves the kinda debate he can use his very own rhetoric/spin, and get away with it - Polythene, you are better off researching that question through Mr Google! lol

[1gw] 10/8/2017 13:43

Perhaps the point here polythene is that some of the posters don't feel capable of discussing the point and/or feel intimidated by STT's capacity for endless research, repetition and posting of his own spin on any issue.

In this particular case, I think it's a highly relevant point. R1 has taken a bet on the full stack being the winning strategy - cutting out "middle men", having control and being able to optimise. R1's thesis is that "point" solutions run the risk of being squeezed out. Others are taking if not the opposite bet, at least a significantly different one - one that involves not necessarily moving to a point solution but as I read it moving to concentrate just on either the demand side or the sell side (presumably as integrated as they can make their solution given that focus).

I find R1's argument reasonably convincing directionally, but equally those abandoning one side (DSP or SSP) appear to have credible reasons for doing so. Probably not an argument that can be decisively solved on these boards - but maybe one that the company or its advisors could address if anyone feels strongly enough about the issue to contact them?